IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0235510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computer-based cognitive interventions in acquired brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Fernández López
  • Adoración Antolí

Abstract

Introduction: Acquired brain injury (ABI) leads to cognitive deficits in a great variety of cognitive functions. Interventions aimed at reducing such deficits include the use of computer-based cognitive interventions. The present work synthetizes and quantitively analyses the effect of computer-based cognitive interventions in ABI. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest and Ovid databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) addressing this issue. A total number of 8 randomized-controlled trials were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. Univariate meta-analyses were conducted for every cognitive function, producing aggregates when a study contributed more than one effect size per cognitive domain. Results: Random-effects meta-analyses showed an improvement of Visual and Verbal working memory, while other domains like Attention, Processing speed, Executive functions and Memory were not benefited by the interventions. Conclusions: Computer-based cognitive interventions might be a beneficial intervention for ABI population to improve Visual and Verbal working memory, although no effect was found in other cognitive domains. Implications and possible future directions of the research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Fernández López & Adoración Antolí, 2020. "Computer-based cognitive interventions in acquired brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235510
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235510
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235510&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0235510?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amit Lampit & Harry Hallock & Michael Valenzuela, 2014. "Computerized Cognitive Training in Cognitively Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effect Modifiers," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    3. Megan Spencer-Smith & Torkel Klingberg, 2015. "Benefits of a Working Memory Training Program for Inattention in Daily Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Viechtbauer, Wolfgang, 2010. "Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i03).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scharfen, Jana & Peters, Judith Marie & Holling, Heinz, 2018. "Retest effects in cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 44-66.
    2. Sala, Giovanni & Aksayli, N. Deniz & Tatlidil, K. Semir & Gondo, Yasuyuki & Gobet, Fernand, 2019. "Working memory training does not enhance older adults' cognitive skills: A comprehensive meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Piers Steel & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Herman Aguinis, 2021. "The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(1), pages 23-44, February.
    4. Kelly R Moran & Sara Y Del Valle, 2016. "A Meta-Analysis of the Association between Gender and Protective Behaviors in Response to Respiratory Epidemics and Pandemics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Evangelos Danopoulos & Maureen Twiddy & Jeanette M Rotchell, 2020. "Microplastic contamination of drinking water: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Boshra H. Namin & Torvald Øgaard & Jo Røislien, 2021. "Workplace Incivility and Turnover Intention in Organizations: A Meta-Analytic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Ruohuang Jiao & Wojtek Przepiorka & Vincent Buskens, 2022. "Moderators of reputation effects in peer-to-peer online markets: a meta-analytic model selection approach," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1041-1067, May.
    8. Pedro Silva Moreira & Pedro R Almeida & Hugo Leite-Almeida & Nuno Sousa & Patrício Costa, 2016. "Impact of Chronic Stress Protocols in Learning and Memory in Rodents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    9. repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:720-744 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Mohith M. Varma & Shengzi Zeng & Laura Singh & Emily A. Holmes & Jingyun Huang & Man Hey Chiu & Xiaoqing Hu, 2024. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental methods for modulating intrusive memories following lab-analogue trauma exposure in non-clinical populations," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(10), pages 1968-1987, October.
    11. Woodley of Menie, Michael A. & Peñaherrera-Aguirre, Mateo & Sarraf, Matthew A., 2022. "Signs of a Flynn effect in rodents? Secular differentiation of the manifold of general cognitive ability in laboratory mice (Mus musculus) and Norwegian rats (Rattus norvegicus) over a century—Results," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    12. Chad K Bush & Dayaamayi Kurimella & Lee J S Cross & Katherine R Conner & Sheryl Martin-Schild & Jiang He & Changwei Li & Jing Chen & Tanika Kelly, 2016. "Endovascular Treatment with Stent-Retriever Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Laurens Manning & Moses Laman & Wendy A Davis & Timothy M E Davis, 2014. "Clinical Features and Outcome in Children with Severe Plasmodium falciparum Malaria: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-11, February.
    14. Mikkel Wallentin, 2018. "Sex differences in post-stroke aphasia rates are caused by age. A meta-analysis and database query," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Ewa Zasadzka & Anna Pieczyńska & Tomasz Trzmiel & Paweł Kleka & Mariola Pawlaczyk, 2021. "Correlation between Handgrip Strength and Depression in Older Adults—A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, April.
    16. Dominika Wilczyńska & Wen Qi & José Carlos Jaenes & David Alarcón & María José Arenilla & Mariusz Lipowski, 2022. "Burnout and Mental Interventions among Youth Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, August.
    17. van Aert, Robbie Cornelis Maria & van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., 2018. "P-uniform," MetaArXiv zqjr9, Center for Open Science.
    18. B G Pijls & J M T A Meessen & J W Schoones & M Fiocco & H J L van der Heide & A Sedrakyan & R G H H Nelissen, 2016. "Increased Mortality in Metal-on-Metal versus Non-Metal-on-Metal Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty at 10 Years and Longer Follow-Up: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Briana N. M. Hagen & Charlotte B. Winder & Jared Wootten & Carrie K. McMullen & Andria Jones-Bitton, 2020. "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Depression among Farming Populations Worldwide," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Sergio Nolazco & Kaspar Delhey & Shinichi Nakagawa & Anne Peters, 2022. "Ornaments are equally informative in male and female birds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    21. Schubert, Anna-Lena, 2019. "A meta-analysis of the worst performance rule," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 88-100.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.