IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0009044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overview of snakebite in Brazil: Possible drivers and a tool for risk mapping

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Cristina Schneider
  • Kyung-duk Min
  • Patricia Nájera Hamrick
  • Lucia R Montebello
  • Tani Maria Ranieri
  • Lucia Mardini
  • Volney M Camara
  • Ronir Raggio Luiz
  • Bernhard Liese
  • Myriam Vuckovic
  • Milton Ozorio Moraes
  • Nísia Trindade Lima

Abstract

Snakebite envenoming affects close to 2.7 million people globally every year. In Brazil, snakebites are reported to the Ministry of Health surveillance system and cases receive antivenom free of charge. There is an urgent need to identify higher risk areas for antivenom distribution, and to develop prevention activities. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of the epidemiological situation of snakebite envenoming in Brazil and explore possible drivers; as well as to create a flowchart tool to support decision-makers identify higher risk areas. An ecological-type study was carried out using data by municipality (2013–2017). Study parts: 1) Create a geocoded database and perform a descriptive and cluster analysis; 2) Statistical analysis to measure the association of snakebite and possible environmental and socioeconomic drivers; 3) Develop a flowchart to support decision-makers and the application of this tool in one state (Rio Grande do Sul) as an example. An average of 27,120 snakebite cases per year were reported at the country level. Clusters of municipalities with high numbers of snakebites are mostly found in the Amazon Legal Region. The negative binomial regression model showed association with the snakebite case count: the type of major habitat, tropical or non-tropical; temperature; percentage of urbanization; precipitation; elevation; GDP per capita; a weaker relation with forest loss; and with venomous snake richness. The state where the instrument was applied reported 4,227 snakebites in the period. Most municipalities were considered as medium risk and 56/496 as high risk according to the tool created. Snakebite cases are distributed across the entire country with the highest concentration in the Legal Amazon Region. This creates a complex situation both for better understanding of the association of environmental and socioeconomic factors with snakebites and for the distribution and maintenance of antivenom to remote areas. Research into types of antivenom with a longer shelf life without the need for refrigeration is needed.Author summary: It is estimated that snakebite envenoming affects around 2.7 million people every year worldwide. In Brazil, snakebite is part of the Ministry of Health surveillance system and cases receive antivenom free of charge. With a vast territory and limited production of antivenom, there is need to identify higher risk areas for its distribution and to develop preventative actions. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of the epidemiological situation of snakebite envenoming in Brazil and explore possible environmental and socioeconomic factors related to snakebites. On the basis of this information, a flowchart tool to support decision-makers identify higher risk areas was created and applied in one state as an example. An average of 27,120 snakebite cases per year were reported in Brazil, with the highest number of cases and rates in the Legal Amazon Region. The multivariable statistics analysis showed association of snakebite with environmental factors (type of major habitat, tropical or non-tropical; temperature; precipitation; elevation) and socioeconomic (lower percentage of urbanization; lower GDP per capita); also, a weaker relation with forest loss, and with venomous snake richness. The tool created to support decision-makers was applied in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, with 4,227 reported snakebites during the period. According to this tool, the majority of municipalities in this state were considered as medium risk and 56/496 as high risk. Snakebite cases are distributed across the entire country; however, the highest concentration is in the Legal Amazon Region. This creates a complex situation both for better understanding of the association of environmental and socioeconomic factors with snakebites and for the distribution and maintenance of antivenom to remote areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Cristina Schneider & Kyung-duk Min & Patricia Nájera Hamrick & Lucia R Montebello & Tani Maria Ranieri & Lucia Mardini & Volney M Camara & Ronir Raggio Luiz & Bernhard Liese & Myriam Vuckovic & , 2021. "Overview of snakebite in Brazil: Possible drivers and a tool for risk mapping," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009044
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009044
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009044&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Hansson & Mahmood Sasa & Kristoffer Mattisson & Arodys Robles & José María Gutiérrez, 2013. "Using Geographical Information Systems to Identify Populations in Need of Improved Accessibility to Antivenom Treatment for Snakebite Envenoming in Costa Rica," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. David J Williams & Mohd Abul Faiz & Bernadette Abela-Ridder & Stuart Ainsworth & Tommaso C Bulfone & Andrea D Nickerson & Abdulrazaq G Habib & Thomas Junghanss & Hui Wen Fan & Michael Turner & Robert , 2019. "Strategy for a globally coordinated response to a priority neglected tropical disease: Snakebite envenoming," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Carlos Yañez-Arenas & A Townsend Peterson & Pierre Mokondoko & Octavio Rojas-Soto & Enrique Martínez-Meyer, 2014. "The Use of Ecological Niche Modeling to Infer Potential Risk Areas of Snakebite in the Mexican State of Veracruz," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-9, June.
    4. Maria Cristina Schneider & Patricia Najera & Martha M Pereira & Gustavo Machado & Celso B dos Anjos & Rogério O Rodrigues & Gabriela M Cavagni & Claudia Muñoz-Zanzi & Luis G Corbellini & Mariana Leone, 2015. "Leptospirosis in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: An Ecosystem Approach in the Animal-Human Interface," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thiago L. Jucá & Leonardo R. Oliveira Normando & Abdulrazak B. Ibrahim & Alex Chapeaurouge & Ana Cristina de Oliveira Monteiro‐Moreira & Stephen P. Mackessy, 2021. "Drought, desertification and poverty: A geospatial analysis of snakebite envenoming in the Caatinga biome of Brazil," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1685-1696, September.
    2. Rebecca G Theophanous & Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci & Fan Hui Wen & S Michelle Griffin & Victoria E Anderson & Michael E Mullins & Nicklaus P Brandehoff & Eugenia B Quackenbush & Sean P Bush & Eric , 2019. "Validity and reliability of telephone administration of the patient-specific functional scale for the assessment of recovery from snakebite envenomation," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Sillero, Neftalí & Arenas-Castro, Salvador & Enriquez‐Urzelai, Urtzi & Vale, Cândida Gomes & Sousa-Guedes, Diana & Martínez-Freiría, Fernando & Real, Raimundo & Barbosa, A.Márcia, 2021. "Want to model a species niche? A step-by-step guideline on correlative ecological niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 456(C).
    4. Carlos Yañez-Arenas & A. Townsend Peterson & Karla Rodríguez-Medina & Narayani Barve, 2016. "Mapping current and future potential snakebite risk in the new world," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 697-711, February.
    5. Carlos Yañez-Arenas & A. Townsend Peterson & Karla Rodríguez-Medina & Narayani Barve, 2016. "Mapping current and future potential snakebite risk in the new world," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 697-711, February.
    6. Ajay Chandra & S. D. Sreeganga & Nibedita Rath & Arkalgud Ramaprasad, 2023. "Healthcare Policies to Eliminate Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) in India: A Roadmap," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Luca Nalbone & Filippo Giarratana & Ettore Napoli, 2021. "Balantidiasis: A Neglected Tropical Disease Used as a Study Model for a Holistic Approach to Sustainable Development in the Framework of Agenda 2030 Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Philipp Berg & Francois Theart & Marcel Driel & Esta L. Saaiman & Lise-Bethy Mavoungou, 2024. "Snakebite envenoming in Africa remains widely neglected and demands multidisciplinary attention," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-4, December.
    9. James A Watson & Thomas Lamb & Jane Holmes & David A Warrell & Khin Thida Thwin & Zaw Lynn Aung & Min Zaw Oo & Myat Thet Nwe & Frank Smithuis & Elizabeth A Ashley, 2020. "A Bayesian phase 2 model based adaptive design to optimise antivenom dosing: Application to a dose-finding trial for a novel Russell’s viper antivenom in Myanmar," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Sayem Ahmed & Guibehi B Koudou & Maïwenn Bagot & François Drabo & Windtaré R Bougma & Caisey Pulford & Moses Bockarie & Robert A Harrison, 2021. "Health and economic burden estimates of snakebite management upon health facilities in three regions of southern Burkina Faso," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Steven R. Hall & Sean A. Rasmussen & Edouard Crittenden & Charlotte A. Dawson & Keirah E. Bartlett & Adam P. Westhorpe & Laura-Oana Albulescu & Jeroen Kool & José María Gutiérrez & Nicholas R. Casewel, 2023. "Repurposed drugs and their combinations prevent morbidity-inducing dermonecrosis caused by diverse cytotoxic snake venoms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Carolina Ureta & Carlos Martorell & Ángela P Cuervo-Robayo & María C Mandujano & Enrique Martínez-Meyer, 2018. "Inferring space from time: On the relationship between demography and environmental suitability in the desert plant O. rastrera," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Daniel Zacarias & Rafael Loyola, 2019. "Climate change impacts on the distribution of venomous snakes and snakebite risk in Mozambique," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 195-207, January.
    14. Guilherme Kemeron Maciel Salazar & Joseir Saturnino Cristino & Alexandre Vilhena Silva-Neto & Altair Seabra Farias & João Arthur Alcântara & Vinícius Azevedo Machado & Felipe Murta & Vanderson Souza S, 2021. "Snakebites in “Invisible Populations”: A cross-sectional survey in riverine populations in the remote western Brazilian Amazon," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, September.
    15. Julien Potet & James Smith & Lachlan McIver, 2019. "Reviewing evidence of the clinical effectiveness of commercially available antivenoms in sub-Saharan Africa identifies the need for a multi-centre, multi-antivenom clinical trial," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.