IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0007551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reviewing evidence of the clinical effectiveness of commercially available antivenoms in sub-Saharan Africa identifies the need for a multi-centre, multi-antivenom clinical trial

Author

Listed:
  • Julien Potet
  • James Smith
  • Lachlan McIver

Abstract

Background: Snakebite envenoming kills more than more than 20,000 people in Sub-Saharan Africa every year. Poorly regulated markets have been inundated with low-price, low-quality antivenoms. This review aimed to systematically collect and analyse the clinical data on all antivenom products now available in markets of sub-Saharan Africa. Methodology/Principal findings: Our market analysis identified 12 polyspecific and 4 monospecific antivenom products in African markets. Our search strategy was first based on a systematic search of publication databases, followed by manual searches and discussions with experts. All types of data, including programmatic data, were eligible. All types of publications were eligible, including grey literature. Cohorts of less than 10 patients were excluded. 26 publications met the inclusion criteria. Many publications had to be excluded because clinical outcomes were not clearly linked to a specific product. Our narrative summaries present product-specific clinical data in terms of safety and effectiveness against the different species and envenoming syndromes. Three products (EchiTabPlus, EchiTabG, SAIMR-Echis-monovalent) were found to have been tested in robust clinical studies and found effective against envenoming caused by the West African carpet viper (Echis ocellatus). Four products (Inoserp-Panafricain, Fav-Afrique, SAIMR-Polyvalent, Antivipmyn-Africa) were found to have been evaluated only in observational single-arm studies, with varying results. For nine other products, there are either no data in the public domain, or only negative data suggesting a lack of effectiveness. Conclusions/Significance: Clinical data vary among the different antivenom products currently in African markets. Some products are available commercially although they have been found to lack effectiveness. The World Health Organization should strengthen its capacity to assess antivenom products, support antivenom manufacturers, and assist African countries and international aid organizations in selecting appropriate quality antivenoms. Author summary: Snakebite envenomation represents one of the most neglected tropical medical conditions worldwide. Despite high levels of morbidity and mortality associated with snakebite, its neglected nature has compromised the availability and evaluation of antivenom treatment. This review was initiated by Médecins Sans Frontières’ / Doctors Without Borders (MSF) Access Campaign, as the existing antivenom access crisis in sub-Saharan Africa was deepening. This study sought to review the clinical data pertaining to each antivenom product currently available for use in sub-Saharan Africa. 16 different antivenoms were identified. A total of 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. Given the heterogeneity of study methodology and quality, data for individual antivenoms are presented in the form of a narrative analysis. Only two studies reported clinical data collected from randomized controlled trials. Consistent monitoring of the side effects of antivenom treatment was lacking. The absence of good quality data for the majority of antivenoms in sub-Saharan Africa is a major concern. Further robust data collection is required, while urgent investments are needed at the global level to ensure a sustained production of safe and effective antivenom treatment, and its affordable access across sub-Saharan Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Julien Potet & James Smith & Lachlan McIver, 2019. "Reviewing evidence of the clinical effectiveness of commercially available antivenoms in sub-Saharan Africa identifies the need for a multi-centre, multi-antivenom clinical trial," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0007551
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0007551
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0007551&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J Williams & Mohd Abul Faiz & Bernadette Abela-Ridder & Stuart Ainsworth & Tommaso C Bulfone & Andrea D Nickerson & Abdulrazaq G Habib & Thomas Junghanss & Hui Wen Fan & Michael Turner & Robert , 2019. "Strategy for a globally coordinated response to a priority neglected tropical disease: Snakebite envenoming," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thiago L. Jucá & Leonardo R. Oliveira Normando & Abdulrazak B. Ibrahim & Alex Chapeaurouge & Ana Cristina de Oliveira Monteiro‐Moreira & Stephen P. Mackessy, 2021. "Drought, desertification and poverty: A geospatial analysis of snakebite envenoming in the Caatinga biome of Brazil," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1685-1696, September.
    2. Maria Cristina Schneider & Kyung-duk Min & Patricia Nájera Hamrick & Lucia R Montebello & Tani Maria Ranieri & Lucia Mardini & Volney M Camara & Ronir Raggio Luiz & Bernhard Liese & Myriam Vuckovic & , 2021. "Overview of snakebite in Brazil: Possible drivers and a tool for risk mapping," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Rebecca G Theophanous & Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci & Fan Hui Wen & S Michelle Griffin & Victoria E Anderson & Michael E Mullins & Nicklaus P Brandehoff & Eugenia B Quackenbush & Sean P Bush & Eric , 2019. "Validity and reliability of telephone administration of the patient-specific functional scale for the assessment of recovery from snakebite envenomation," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Ajay Chandra & S. D. Sreeganga & Nibedita Rath & Arkalgud Ramaprasad, 2023. "Healthcare Policies to Eliminate Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) in India: A Roadmap," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(19), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Luca Nalbone & Filippo Giarratana & Ettore Napoli, 2021. "Balantidiasis: A Neglected Tropical Disease Used as a Study Model for a Holistic Approach to Sustainable Development in the Framework of Agenda 2030 Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Philipp Berg & Francois Theart & Marcel Driel & Esta L. Saaiman & Lise-Bethy Mavoungou, 2024. "Snakebite envenoming in Africa remains widely neglected and demands multidisciplinary attention," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-4, December.
    7. James A Watson & Thomas Lamb & Jane Holmes & David A Warrell & Khin Thida Thwin & Zaw Lynn Aung & Min Zaw Oo & Myat Thet Nwe & Frank Smithuis & Elizabeth A Ashley, 2020. "A Bayesian phase 2 model based adaptive design to optimise antivenom dosing: Application to a dose-finding trial for a novel Russell’s viper antivenom in Myanmar," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Sayem Ahmed & Guibehi B Koudou & Maïwenn Bagot & François Drabo & Windtaré R Bougma & Caisey Pulford & Moses Bockarie & Robert A Harrison, 2021. "Health and economic burden estimates of snakebite management upon health facilities in three regions of southern Burkina Faso," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Steven R. Hall & Sean A. Rasmussen & Edouard Crittenden & Charlotte A. Dawson & Keirah E. Bartlett & Adam P. Westhorpe & Laura-Oana Albulescu & Jeroen Kool & José María Gutiérrez & Nicholas R. Casewel, 2023. "Repurposed drugs and their combinations prevent morbidity-inducing dermonecrosis caused by diverse cytotoxic snake venoms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Guilherme Kemeron Maciel Salazar & Joseir Saturnino Cristino & Alexandre Vilhena Silva-Neto & Altair Seabra Farias & João Arthur Alcântara & Vinícius Azevedo Machado & Felipe Murta & Vanderson Souza S, 2021. "Snakebites in “Invisible Populations”: A cross-sectional survey in riverine populations in the remote western Brazilian Amazon," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0007551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.