IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1009611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting population genetic change in an autocorrelated random environment: Insights from a large automated experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Rescan
  • Daphné Grulois
  • Enrique Ortega Aboud
  • Pierre de Villemereuil
  • Luis-Miguel Chevin

Abstract

Most natural environments exhibit a substantial component of random variation, with a degree of temporal autocorrelation that defines the color of environmental noise. Such environmental fluctuations cause random fluctuations in natural selection, affecting the predictability of evolution. But despite long-standing theoretical interest in population genetics in stochastic environments, there is a dearth of empirical estimation of underlying parameters of this theory. More importantly, it is still an open question whether evolution in fluctuating environments can be predicted indirectly using simpler measures, which combine environmental time series with population estimates in constant environments. Here we address these questions by using an automated experimental evolution approach. We used a liquid-handling robot to expose over a hundred lines of the micro-alga Dunaliella salina to randomly fluctuating salinity over a continuous range, with controlled mean, variance, and autocorrelation. We then tracked the frequencies of two competing strains through amplicon sequencing of nuclear and choloroplastic barcode sequences. We show that the magnitude of environmental fluctuations (determined by their variance), but also their predictability (determined by their autocorrelation), had large impacts on the average selection coefficient. The variance in frequency change, which quantifies randomness in population genetics, was substantially higher in a fluctuating environment. The reaction norm of selection coefficients against constant salinity yielded accurate predictions for the mean selection coefficient in a fluctuating environment. This selection reaction norm was in turn well predicted by environmental tolerance curves, with population growth rate against salinity. However, both the selection reaction norm and tolerance curves underestimated the variance in selection caused by random environmental fluctuations. Overall, our results provide exceptional insights into the prospects for understanding and predicting genetic evolution in randomly fluctuating environments.Author summary: Being able to predict evolution under natural selection is important for many applied fields of biology, ranging from agriculture to medicine or conservation. However, this endeavor is complicated by factors that inherently limit our ability to predict the future, such as random fluctuations in the environment. Population genetic theory indicates that probabilistic predictions can still be made in this context, but the extent to which this holds empirically, and whether these predictions can be based on simple measurements, are still open questions. Making progress on answering these questions can be achieved by capitalizing on experiments where the environment is precisely controlled over many generations. Here, we used a pipetting robot to generate random time series of salinities with controlled patterns of fluctuations, which we imposed on a microalga, Dunaliella salina. Tracking the frequencies of two genotypes in a mixture by sequencing a short barcode sequence, we were able to show how patterns of fluctuating selection relate to the fluctuating environment. Interestingly, parts of these responses, but not all, could be predicted by simpler measurements in constant environments, allowing precise characterization the limits and prospects for predicting evolution in fluctuating environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Rescan & Daphné Grulois & Enrique Ortega Aboud & Pierre de Villemereuil & Luis-Miguel Chevin, 2021. "Predicting population genetic change in an autocorrelated random environment: Insights from a large automated experiment," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009611
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009611
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009611&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009611?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Wang & Michael E. Dillon, 2014. "Recent geographic convergence in diurnal and annual temperature cycling flattens global thermal profiles," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(11), pages 988-992, November.
    2. Alex N. Nguyen Ba & Ivana Cvijović & José I. Rojas Echenique & Katherine R. Lawrence & Artur Rego-Costa & Xianan Liu & Sasha F. Levy & Michael M. Desai, 2019. "High-resolution lineage tracking reveals travelling wave of adaptation in laboratory yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7783), pages 494-499, November.
    3. Sasha F. Levy & Jamie R. Blundell & Sandeep Venkataram & Dmitri A. Petrov & Daniel S. Fisher & Gavin Sherlock, 2015. "Quantitative evolutionary dynamics using high-resolution lineage tracking," Nature, Nature, vol. 519(7542), pages 181-186, March.
    4. Luis-Miguel Chevin & Russell Lande & Georgina M Mace, 2010. "Adaptation, Plasticity, and Extinction in a Changing Environment: Towards a Predictive Theory," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-8, April.
    5. Sébastien Boyer & Lucas Hérissant & Gavin Sherlock, 2021. "Adaptation is influenced by the complexity of environmental change during evolution in a dynamic environment," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-27, January.
    6. Patrik Nosil & Samuel M. Flaxman & Jeffrey L. Feder & Zachariah Gompert, 2020. "Increasing our ability to predict contemporary evolution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-6, December.
    7. Angus Buckling & R. Craig Maclean & Michael A. Brockhurst & Nick Colegrave, 2009. "The Beagle in a bottle," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7231), pages 824-829, February.
    8. Luis-Miguel Chevin & Russell Lande & Georgina M Mace, 2010. "Adaptation, Plasticity, and Extinction in a Changing Environment: Towards a Predictive Theory," Working Papers id:2494, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wesley R. Brooks & Stephen C. Newbold, 2013. "Ecosystem damages in integrated assessment models of climate change," NCEE Working Paper Series 201302, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Mar 2013.
    2. Bruno R Ribeiro & Lilian P Sales & Paulo De Marco Jr. & Rafael Loyola, 2016. "Assessing Mammal Exposure to Climate Change in the Brazilian Amazon," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Robert J. Knell & Stephen J. Thackeray, 2016. "Voltinism and resilience to climate-induced phenological mismatch," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 525-539, August.
    4. Ayllón, Daniel & Railsback, Steven F. & Vincenzi, Simone & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Almodóvar, Ana & Grimm, Volker, 2016. "InSTREAM-Gen: Modelling eco-evolutionary dynamics of trout populations under anthropogenic environmental change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 36-53.
    5. Freitas, Osmar & Araujo, Sabrina B.L. & Campos, Paulo R.A., 2022. "Speciation in a metapopulation model upon environmental changes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    6. Harry R Harding & Timothy A C Gordon & Emma Eastcott & Stephen D Simpson & Andrew N Radford & Leigh Simmons, 2019. "Causes and consequences of intraspecific variation in animal responses to anthropogenic noise," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(6), pages 1501-1511.
    7. Greenspoon, Philip B. & Mideo, Nicole, 2017. "Evolutionary rescue of a parasite population by mutation rate evolution," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 64-75.
    8. Daniel P. G. H. Wong & Benjamin H. Good, 2024. "Quantifying the adaptive landscape of commensal gut bacteria using high-resolution lineage tracking," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Maldonado-Chaparro, Adriana A. & Read, Dwight W. & Blumstein, Daniel T., 2017. "Can individual variation in phenotypic plasticity enhance population viability?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 352(C), pages 19-30.
    10. Brooks, Wesley R. & Newbold, Stephen C., 2014. "An updated biodiversity nonuse value function for use in climate change integrated assessment models," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 342-349.
    11. Sébastien Boyer & Lucas Hérissant & Gavin Sherlock, 2021. "Adaptation is influenced by the complexity of environmental change during evolution in a dynamic environment," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-27, January.
    12. Michael J. Noonan & Chris Newman & Andrew Markham & Kirstin Bilham & Christina D. Buesching & David W. Macdonald, 2018. "In situ behavioral plasticity as compensation for weather variability: implications for future climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 457-471, August.
    13. Anderson, James J. & Gurarie, Eliezer & Bracis, Chloe & Burke, Brian J. & Laidre, Kristin L., 2013. "Modeling climate change impacts on phenology and population dynamics of migratory marine species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 264(C), pages 83-97.
    14. Konstantinos Kougioumoutzis & Ioannis P. Kokkoris & Arne Strid & Thomas Raus & Panayotis Dimopoulos, 2021. "Climate-Change Impacts on the Southernmost Mediterranean Arctic-Alpine Plant Populations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Matt J. Michel & Huicheng Chien & Collin E. Beachum & Micah G. Bennett & Jason H. Knouft, 2017. "Climate change, hydrology, and fish morphology: predictions using phenotype-environment associations," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 563-576, February.
    16. Yahuza Lurwanu & Yan-Ping Wang & Waheed Abdul & Jiasui Zhan & Li-Na Yang, 2020. "Temperature-Mediated Plasticity Regulates the Adaptation of Phytophthora infestans to Azoxystrobin Fungicide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Davison, Raziel & Stadman, Marc & Jongejans, Eelke, 2019. "Stochastic effects contribute to population fitness differences," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Reid S. Brennan & James A. deMayo & Hans G. Dam & Michael B. Finiguerra & Hannes Baumann & Melissa H. Pespeni, 2022. "Loss of transcriptional plasticity but sustained adaptive capacity after adaptation to global change conditions in a marine copepod," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Karen B Strier & Anthony R Ives, 2012. "Unexpected Demography in the Recovery of an Endangered Primate Population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-11, September.
    20. Minke B. W. Langenhof & Jan Komdeur, 2013. "Coping with Change: A Closer Look at the Underlying Attributes of Change and the Individual Response to Unstable Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-25, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.