IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1007741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deleterious variation shapes the genomic landscape of introgression

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Y Kim
  • Christian D Huber
  • Kirk E Lohmueller

Abstract

While it is appreciated that population size changes can impact patterns of deleterious variation in natural populations, less attention has been paid to how gene flow affects and is affected by the dynamics of deleterious variation. Here we use population genetic simulations to examine how gene flow impacts deleterious variation under a variety of demographic scenarios, mating systems, dominance coefficients, and recombination rates. Our results show that admixture between populations can temporarily reduce the genetic load of smaller populations and cause increases in the frequency of introgressed ancestry, especially if deleterious mutations are recessive. Additionally, when fitness effects of new mutations are recessive, between-population differences in the sites at which deleterious variants exist creates heterosis in hybrid individuals. Together, these factors lead to an increase in introgressed ancestry, particularly when recombination rates are low. Under certain scenarios, introgressed ancestry can increase from an initial frequency of 5% to 30–75% and fix at many loci, even in the absence of beneficial mutations. Further, deleterious variation and admixture can generate correlations between the frequency of introgressed ancestry and recombination rate or exon density, even in the absence of other types of selection. The direction of these correlations is determined by the specific demography and whether mutations are additive or recessive. Therefore, it is essential that null models of admixture include both demography and deleterious variation before invoking other mechanisms to explain unusual patterns of genetic variation.Author summary: Individuals from distinct populations sometimes will produce fertile offspring and will exchange genetic material in a process called hybridization. Genomes of hybrid individuals often show non-random patterns of hybrid ancestry across the genome, where some regions have a high frequency of ancestry from the second population and other regions have less. Typically, this pattern has been attributed to adaptive introgression, where beneficial genetic variants are passed from one population to the other, or to genomic incompatibilities between these distinct species. However, other mechanisms could lead to these heterogeneous patterns of ancestry in hybrids. Here we use simulations to investigate whether deleterious mutations affect the patterns of introgressed ancestry across genomes. We show that when ancestry from a larger population is added to a smaller population, the ancestry from the larger population dramatically increases in frequency because it carries fewer deleterious mutations. This occurs even in the absence of beneficial mutations in either population. Additionally, we show that differences in sex chromosome evolution relative to autosomes, or differences in mating system, can affect patterns of introgression in similar ways. Our study argues that deleterious mutations should be included in population genetic models used to identify unusual regions of the genome that appear to be under selection in hybrids.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Y Kim & Christian D Huber & Kirk E Lohmueller, 2018. "Deleterious variation shapes the genomic landscape of introgression," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-30, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1007741
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007741
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007741&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007741?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter D. Keightley & Sarah P. Otto, 2006. "Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 443(7107), pages 89-92, September.
    2. Jerome Kelleher & Kevin R Thornton & Jaime Ashander & Peter L Ralph, 2018. "Efficient pedigree recording for fast population genetics simulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Augustine Kong & Gudmar Thorleifsson & Daniel F. Gudbjartsson & Gisli Masson & Asgeir Sigurdsson & Aslaug Jonasdottir & G. Bragi Walters & Adalbjorg Jonasdottir & Arnaldur Gylfason & Kari Th. Kristins, 2010. "Fine-scale recombination rate differences between sexes, populations and individuals," Nature, Nature, vol. 467(7319), pages 1099-1103, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew H Chan & Paul A Jenkins & Yun S Song, 2012. "Genome-Wide Fine-Scale Recombination Rate Variation in Drosophila melanogaster," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Gustavo V. Barroso & Nataša Puzović & Julien Y Dutheil, 2019. "Inference of recombination maps from a single pair of genomes and its application to ancient samples," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Julian Petersen & Lukas Englmaier & Artem V. Artemov & Irina Poverennaya & Ruba Mahmoud & Thibault Bouderlique & Marketa Tesarova & Ruslan Deviatiiarov & Anett Szilvásy-Szabó & Evgeny E. Akkuratov & D, 2023. "A previously uncharacterized Factor Associated with Metabolism and Energy (FAME/C14orf105/CCDC198/1700011H14Rik) is related to evolutionary adaptation, energy balance, and kidney physiology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Kirk E Lohmueller & Anders Albrechtsen & Yingrui Li & Su Yeon Kim & Thorfinn Korneliussen & Nicolas Vinckenbosch & Geng Tian & Emilia Huerta-Sanchez & Alison F Feder & Niels Grarup & Torben Jørgensen , 2011. "Natural Selection Affects Multiple Aspects of Genetic Variation at Putatively Neutral Sites across the Human Genome," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Manuel Beltrán Del Río & Christopher R. Stephens & David A. Rosenblueth, 2015. "Fitness Landscape Epistasis And Recombination," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(07n08), pages 1-38, November.
    6. David B. Stern & Nathan W. Anderson & Juanita A. Diaz & Carol Eunmi Lee, 2022. "Genome-wide signatures of synergistic epistasis during parallel adaptation in a Baltic Sea copepod," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Ralph, Peter L., 2019. "An empirical approach to demographic inference with genomic data," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 91-101.
    8. Ali Mahmoudi & Jere Koskela & Jerome Kelleher & Yao-ban Chan & David Balding, 2022. "Bayesian inference of ancestral recombination graphs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    9. MacPherson, Brian & Scott, Ryan & Gras, Robin, 2023. "Using individual-based modelling to investigate a pluralistic explanation for the prevalence of sexual reproduction in animal species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    10. Bing Guo & Victor Borda & Roland Laboulaye & Michele D. Spring & Mariusz Wojnarski & Brian A. Vesely & Joana C. Silva & Norman C. Waters & Timothy D. O’Connor & Shannon Takala-Harrison, 2024. "Strong positive selection biases identity-by-descent-based inferences of recent demography and population structure in Plasmodium falciparum," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Lauren A. Choate & Gilad Barshad & Pierce W. McMahon & Iskander Said & Edward J. Rice & Paul R. Munn & James J. Lewis & Charles G. Danko, 2021. "Multiple stages of evolutionary change in anthrax toxin receptor expression in humans," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Masel, Joanna & Lyttle, David N., 2011. "The consequences of rare sexual reproduction by means of selfing in an otherwise clonally reproducing species," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(4), pages 317-322.
    13. Roger D Kouyos & Gabriel E Leventhal & Trevor Hinkley & Mojgan Haddad & Jeannette M Whitcomb & Christos J Petropoulos & Sebastian Bonhoeffer, 2012. "Exploring the Complexity of the HIV-1 Fitness Landscape," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, March.
    14. Rouzine, Igor M. & Coffin, John M., 2010. "Multi-site adaptation in the presence of infrequent recombination," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 189-204.
    15. Benjamin J. Schmiedel & Job Rocha & Cristian Gonzalez-Colin & Sourya Bhattacharyya & Ariel Madrigal & Christian H. Ottensmeier & Ferhat Ay & Vivek Chandra & Pandurangan Vijayanand, 2021. "COVID-19 genetic risk variants are associated with expression of multiple genes in diverse immune cell types," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Kermany, Amir R. & Lessard, Sabin, 2012. "Effect of epistasis and linkage on fixation probability in three-locus models: An ancestral recombination–selection graph approach," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 131-145.
    17. Dominic Nelson & Jerome Kelleher & Aaron P Ragsdale & Claudia Moreau & Gil McVean & Simon Gravel, 2020. "Accounting for long-range correlations in genome-wide simulations of large cohorts," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, May.
    18. Mark Lipson & Po-Ru Loh & Sriram Sankararaman & Nick Patterson & Bonnie Berger & David Reich, 2015. "Calibrating the Human Mutation Rate via Ancestral Recombination Density in Diploid Genomes," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1007741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.