IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1002482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Flexible Bayesian Model for Studying Gene–Environment Interaction

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Yu
  • Sholom Wacholder
  • William Wheeler
  • Zhaoming Wang
  • Neil Caporaso
  • Maria Teresa Landi
  • Faming Liang

Abstract

An important follow-up step after genetic markers are found to be associated with a disease outcome is a more detailed analysis investigating how the implicated gene or chromosomal region and an established environment risk factor interact to influence the disease risk. The standard approach to this study of gene–environment interaction considers one genetic marker at a time and therefore could misrepresent and underestimate the genetic contribution to the joint effect when one or more functional loci, some of which might not be genotyped, exist in the region and interact with the environment risk factor in a complex way. We develop a more global approach based on a Bayesian model that uses a latent genetic profile variable to capture all of the genetic variation in the entire targeted region and allows the environment effect to vary across different genetic profile categories. We also propose a resampling-based test derived from the developed Bayesian model for the detection of gene–environment interaction. Using data collected in the Environment and Genetics in Lung Cancer Etiology (EAGLE) study, we apply the Bayesian model to evaluate the joint effect of smoking intensity and genetic variants in the 15q25.1 region, which contains a cluster of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor genes and has been shown to be associated with both lung cancer and smoking behavior. We find evidence for gene–environment interaction (P-value = 0.016), with the smoking effect appearing to be stronger in subjects with a genetic profile associated with a higher lung cancer risk; the conventional test of gene–environment interaction based on the single-marker approach is far from significant. Author Summary: Many common diseases result from a complex interplay of genetic and environmental risk factors. It is important to study the potential genetic and environmental risk factors jointly in order to achieve a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying disease development. The standard single-marker approach that studies the environmental risk factor and one genetic marker at a time could misrepresent the gene–environment interaction, as the single genetic marker might not be an appropriate surrogate for the underlying genetic functioning polymorphisms. We propose a method to look at gene–environment interaction at the gene/region level by integrating information observed on multiple genetic markers within the selected gene/region with measures of environmental exposure. Using data collected in the Environment and Genetics in Lung Cancer Etiology (EAGLE) study, we apply the proposed model to evaluate the joint effect of smoking intensity and genetic variants in the 15q25.1 region and find evidence for gene–environment interaction (P-value = 0.016), with the smoking effect varying according to a subject's genetic profile.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Yu & Sholom Wacholder & William Wheeler & Zhaoming Wang & Neil Caporaso & Maria Teresa Landi & Faming Liang, 2012. "A Flexible Bayesian Model for Studying Gene–Environment Interaction," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1002482
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1002482
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1002482&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Green P.J. & Richardson S., 2002. "Hidden Markov Models and Disease Mapping," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 1055-1070, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spezia, L. & Cooksley, S.L. & Brewer, M.J. & Donnelly, D. & Tree, A., 2014. "Modelling species abundance in a river by Negative Binomial hidden Markov models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 599-614.
    2. Dolores Catelan & Annibale Biggeri & Corrado Lagazio, 2009. "On the clustering term in ecological analysis: how do different prior specifications affect results?," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 18(1), pages 49-61, March.
    3. Luigi Spezia, 2019. "Modelling covariance matrices by the trigonometric separation strategy with application to hidden Markov models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 399-422, June.
    4. Xifen Huang & Chaosong Xiong & Jinfeng Xu & Jianhua Shi & Jinhong Huang, 2022. "Mixture Modeling of Time-to-Event Data in the Proportional Odds Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-11, September.
    5. Luis Nieto-Barajas & Eduardo Gutiérrez-Peña, 2022. "General dependence structures for some models based on exponential families with quadratic variance functions," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 699-716, September.
    6. Jan Povala & Seppo Virtanen & Mark Girolami, 2020. "Burglary in London: insights from statistical heterogeneous spatial point processes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 1067-1090, November.
    7. Francesco Bartolucci & Alessio Farcomeni, 2022. "A hidden Markov space–time model for mapping the dynamics of global access to food," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 246-266, January.
    8. Geweke, John, 2007. "Interpretation and inference in mixture models: Simple MCMC works," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(7), pages 3529-3550, April.
    9. Sijia Xiang & Weixin Yao, 2020. "Semiparametric mixtures of regressions with single-index for model based clustering," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(2), pages 261-292, June.
    10. Ugarte, M.D. & Goicoa, T. & Militino, A.F., 2009. "Empirical Bayes and Fully Bayes procedures to detect high-risk areas in disease mapping," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 2938-2949, June.
    11. Vidal Rodeiro, Carmen L. & Lawson, Andrew B., 2005. "An evaluation of the edge effects in disease map modelling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 45-62, April.
    12. N. Friel & A. N. Pettitt, 2008. "Marginal likelihood estimation via power posteriors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(3), pages 589-607, July.
    13. Yonekura, Shouto & Beskos, Alexandros & Singh, Sumeetpal S., 2021. "Asymptotic analysis of model selection criteria for general hidden Markov models," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 164-191.
    14. Ian L. Dryden & Mark R. Scarr & Charles C. Taylor, 2003. "Bayesian texture segmentation of weed and crop images using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(1), pages 31-50, January.
    15. Zhang, Tonglin & Lin, Ge, 2016. "On Moran’s I coefficient under heterogeneity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 83-94.
    16. Johnson, Timothy D. & Piert, Morand, 2009. "A Bayesian analysis of dual autoradiographic images," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4570-4583, October.
    17. Wanchuang Zhu & Yanan Fan, 2023. "A synthetic likelihood approach for intractable markov random fields," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 749-777, June.
    18. Zhang, Tonglin & Lin, Ge, 2013. "On the limiting distribution of the spatial scan statistic," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 215-225.
    19. R. Reeves, 2004. "Efficient recursions for general factorisable models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(3), pages 751-757, September.
    20. Zhang, Tonglin & Lin, Ge, 2014. "Family of power divergence spatial scan statistics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 162-178.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1002482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.