IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking Transcriptional Activation in the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock

Author

Listed:
  • Karl Fogelmark
  • Carl Troein

Abstract

Circadian clocks are biological timekeepers that allow living cells to time their activity in anticipation of predictable daily changes in light and other environmental factors. The complexity of the circadian clock in higher plants makes it difficult to understand the role of individual genes or molecular interactions, and mathematical modelling has been useful in guiding clock research in model organisms such as Arabidopsis thaliana.We present a model of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis, based on a large corpus of published time course data. It appears from experimental evidence in the literature that most interactions in the clock are repressive. Hence, we remove all transcriptional activation found in previous models of this system, and instead extend the system by including two new components, the morning-expressed activator RVE8 and the nightly repressor/activator NOX.Our modelling results demonstrate that the clock does not need a large number of activators in order to reproduce the observed gene expression patterns. For example, the sequential expression of the PRR genes does not require the genes to be connected as a series of activators. In the presented model, transcriptional activation is exclusively the task of RVE8. Predictions of how strongly RVE8 affects its targets are found to agree with earlier interpretations of the experimental data, but generally we find that the many negative feedbacks in the system should discourage intuitive interpretations of mutant phenotypes. The dynamics of the clock are difficult to predict without mathematical modelling, and the clock is better viewed as a tangled web than as a series of loops.Author Summary: Like most living organisms, plants are dependent on sunlight, and evolution has endowed them with an internal clock by which they can predict sunrise and sunset. The clock consists of many genes that control each other in a complex network, leading to daily oscillations in protein levels. The interactions between genes can be positive or negative, causing target genes to be turned on or off. By constructing mathematical models that incorporate our knowledge of this network, we can interpret experimental data by comparing with results from the models. Any discrepancy between experimental data and model predictions will highlight where we are lacking in understanding. We compiled more than 800 sets of measured data from published articles about the clock in the model organism thale cress (Arabidopsis thaliana). Using these data, we constructed a mathematical model which compares favourably with previous models for simulating the clock. We used our model to investigate the role of positive interactions between genes, whether they are necessary for the function of the clock and if they can be identified in the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Karl Fogelmark & Carl Troein, 2014. "Rethinking Transcriptional Activation in the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003705
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003705
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003705&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003705?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John S. O’Neill & Gerben van Ooijen & Laura E. Dixon & Carl Troein & Florence Corellou & François-Yves Bouget & Akhilesh B. Reddy & Andrew J. Millar, 2011. "Circadian rhythms persist without transcription in a eukaryote," Nature, Nature, vol. 469(7331), pages 554-558, January.
    2. Dmitri A. Nusinow & Anne Helfer & Elizabeth E. Hamilton & Jasmine J. King & Takato Imaizumi & Thomas F. Schultz & Eva M. Farré & Steve A. Kay, 2011. "The ELF4–ELF3–LUX complex links the circadian clock to diurnal control of hypocotyl growth," Nature, Nature, vol. 475(7356), pages 398-402, July.
    3. Ryan N Gutenkunst & Joshua J Waterfall & Fergal P Casey & Kevin S Brown & Christopher R Myers & James P Sethna, 2007. "Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-8, October.
    4. Paloma Más & Woe-Yeon Kim & David E. Somers & Steve A. Kay, 2003. "Targeted degradation of TOC1 by ZTL modulates circadian function in Arabidopsis thaliana," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6966), pages 567-570, December.
    5. Rachel S. Edgar & Edward W. Green & Yuwei Zhao & Gerben van Ooijen & Maria Olmedo & Ximing Qin & Yao Xu & Min Pan & Utham K. Valekunja & Kevin A. Feeney & Elizabeth S. Maywood & Michael H. Hastings & , 2012. "Peroxiredoxins are conserved markers of circadian rhythms," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7399), pages 459-464, May.
    6. Woe-Yeon Kim & Sumire Fujiwara & Sung-Suk Suh & Jeongsik Kim & Yumi Kim & Linqu Han & Karine David & Joanna Putterill & Hong Gil Nam & David E. Somers, 2007. "ZEITLUPE is a circadian photoreceptor stabilized by GIGANTEA in blue light," Nature, Nature, vol. 449(7160), pages 356-360, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Bandara & Johannes P Schlöder & Roland Eils & Hans Georg Bock & Tobias Meyer, 2009. "Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Estimation of a Cell Signaling Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Eberhard O Voit, 2019. "Perspective: Dimensions of the scientific method," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Adel Dayarian & Madalena Chaves & Eduardo D Sontag & Anirvan M Sengupta, 2009. "Shape, Size, and Robustness: Feasible Regions in the Parameter Space of Biochemical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Brian K Mannakee & Ryan N Gutenkunst, 2016. "Selection on Network Dynamics Drives Differential Rates of Protein Domain Evolution," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Chen, Yu & Yu, Hui & Liu, Chengjie & Xie, Jin & Han, Jun & Dai, Houde, 2024. "Synergistic fusion of physical modeling and data-driven approaches for parameter inference to enzymatic biodiesel production system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    6. Alexandre Donzé & Eric Fanchon & Lucie Martine Gattepaille & Oded Maler & Philippe Tracqui, 2011. "Robustness Analysis and Behavior Discrimination in Enzymatic Reaction Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Amrita X Sarkar & Eric A Sobie, 2010. "Regression Analysis for Constraining Free Parameters in Electrophysiological Models of Cardiac Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Hongwei Shao & Tao Peng & Zhiwei Ji & Jing Su & Xiaobo Zhou, 2013. "Systematically Studying Kinase Inhibitor Induced Signaling Network Signatures by Integrating Both Therapeutic and Side Effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Simone Pieralli, 2019. "Bumper crop or dearth: An economic methodology to identify the disruptive effects of climatic variables on French agriculture [Récolte exceptionnelle ou pénurie : une méthodologie économique pour i," Working Papers hal-02786610, HAL.
    10. Alireza Yazdani & Lu Lu & Maziar Raissi & George Em Karniadakis, 2020. "Systems biology informed deep learning for inferring parameters and hidden dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Fridtjof Brauns & Leila Iñigo de la Cruz & Werner K.-G. Daalman & Ilse Bruin & Jacob Halatek & Liedewij Laan & Erwin Frey, 2023. "Redundancy and the role of protein copy numbers in the cell polarization machinery of budding yeast," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Eberhard O Voit & Harald A Martens & Stig W Omholt, 2015. "150 Years of the Mass Action Law," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, January.
    13. Céline Christiansen-Jucht & Kamil Erguler & Chee Yan Shek & María-Gloria Basáñez & Paul E. Parham, 2015. "Modelling Anopheles gambiae s.s. Population Dynamics with Temperature- and Age-Dependent Survival," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, May.
    14. Gabriele Lillacci & Mustafa Khammash, 2010. "Parameter Estimation and Model Selection in Computational Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Andrew White & Malachi Tolman & Howard D Thames & Hubert Rodney Withers & Kathy A Mason & Mark K Transtrum, 2016. "The Limitations of Model-Based Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation in Sloppy Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, December.
    16. Diego Fernández Slezak & Cecilia Suárez & Guillermo A Cecchi & Guillermo Marshall & Gustavo Stolovitzky, 2010. "When the Optimal Is Not the Best: Parameter Estimation in Complex Biological Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-10, October.
    17. Elba Raimúndez & Simone Keller & Gwen Zwingenberger & Karolin Ebert & Sabine Hug & Fabian J Theis & Dieter Maier & Birgit Luber & Jan Hasenauer, 2020. "Model-based analysis of response and resistance factors of cetuximab treatment in gastric cancer cell lines," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Joseph D Taylor & Samuel Winnall & Alain Nogaret, 2020. "Estimation of neuron parameters from imperfect observations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Xinxian Shao & Andrew Mugler & Justin Kim & Ha Jun Jeong & Bruce R Levin & Ilya Nemenman, 2017. "Growth of bacteria in 3-d colonies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Maksat Ashyraliyev & Ken Siggens & Hilde Janssens & Joke Blom & Michael Akam & Johannes Jaeger, 2009. "Gene Circuit Analysis of the Terminal Gap Gene huckebein," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.