IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delay Selection by Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Recurrent Networks of Spiking Neurons Receiving Oscillatory Inputs

Author

Listed:
  • Robert R Kerr
  • Anthony N Burkitt
  • Doreen A Thomas
  • Matthieu Gilson
  • David B Grayden

Abstract

Learning rules, such as spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), change the structure of networks of neurons based on the firing activity. A network level understanding of these mechanisms can help infer how the brain learns patterns and processes information. Previous studies have shown that STDP selectively potentiates feed-forward connections that have specific axonal delays, and that this underlies behavioral functions such as sound localization in the auditory brainstem of the barn owl. In this study, we investigate how STDP leads to the selective potentiation of recurrent connections with different axonal and dendritic delays during oscillatory activity. We develop analytical models of learning with additive STDP in recurrent networks driven by oscillatory inputs, and support the results using simulations with leaky integrate-and-fire neurons. Our results show selective potentiation of connections with specific axonal delays, which depended on the input frequency. In addition, we demonstrate how this can lead to a network becoming selective in the amplitude of its oscillatory response to this frequency. We extend this model of axonal delay selection within a single recurrent network in two ways. First, we show the selective potentiation of connections with a range of both axonal and dendritic delays. Second, we show axonal delay selection between multiple groups receiving out-of-phase, oscillatory inputs. We discuss the application of these models to the formation and activation of neuronal ensembles or cell assemblies in the cortex, and also to missing fundamental pitch perception in the auditory brainstem. Author Summary: Our brain's ability to perform cognitive processes, such as object identification, problem solving, and decision making, comes from the specific connections between neurons. The neurons carry information as spikes that are transmitted to other neurons via connections with different strengths and propagation delays. Experimentally observed learning rules can modify the strengths of connections between neurons based on the timing of their spikes. The learning that occurs in neuronal networks due to these rules is thought to be vital to creating the structures necessary for different cognitive processes as well as for memory. The spiking rate of populations of neurons has been observed to oscillate at particular frequencies in various brain regions, and there is evidence that these oscillations play a role in cognition. Here, we use analytical and numerical methods to investigate the changes to the network structure caused by a specific learning rule during oscillatory neural activity. We find the conditions under which connections with propagation delays that resonate with the oscillations are strengthened relative to the other connections. We demonstrate that networks learn to oscillate more strongly to oscillations at the frequency they were presented with during learning. We discuss the possible application of these results to specific areas of the brain.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert R Kerr & Anthony N Burkitt & Doreen A Thomas & Matthieu Gilson & David B Grayden, 2013. "Delay Selection by Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Recurrent Networks of Spiking Neurons Receiving Oscillatory Inputs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002897
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002897
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002897&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth D. Harris & Jozsef Csicsvari & Hajime Hirase & George Dragoi & György Buzsáki, 2003. "Organization of cell assemblies in the hippocampus," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6948), pages 552-556, July.
    2. Yousheng Shu & Andrea Hasenstaub & David A. McCormick, 2003. "Turning on and off recurrent balanced cortical activity," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6937), pages 288-293, May.
    3. Robert C. Froemke & Yang Dan, 2002. "Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains," Nature, Nature, vol. 416(6879), pages 433-438, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Anne-Marie M Oswald & Nathaniel N Urban & Brent Doiron, 2011. "Balanced Synaptic Input Shapes the Correlation between Neural Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Christian Meisel & Andreas Klaus & Christian Kuehn & Dietmar Plenz, 2015. "Critical Slowing Down Governs the Transition to Neuron Spiking," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Giulia Faini & Dimitrii Tanese & Clément Molinier & Cécile Telliez & Massilia Hamdani & Francois Blot & Christophe Tourain & Vincent Sars & Filippo Bene & Benoît C. Forget & Emiliano Ronzitti & Valent, 2023. "Ultrafast light targeting for high-throughput precise control of neuronal networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Balázs Ujfalussy & Tamás Kiss & Péter Érdi, 2009. "Parallel Computational Subunits in Dentate Granule Cells Generate Multiple Place Fields," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Remus Oşan & Liping Zhu & Shy Shoham & Joe Z Tsien, 2007. "Subspace Projection Approaches to Classification and Visualization of Neural Network-Level Encoding Patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(5), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Yu, Haitao & Guo, Xinmeng & Wang, Jiang & Deng, Bin & Wei, Xile, 2015. "Spike coherence and synchronization on Newman–Watts small-world neuronal networks modulated by spike-timing-dependent plasticity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 419(C), pages 307-317.
    8. Dhanya Parameshwaran & Upinder S Bhalla, 2013. "Theta Frequency Background Tunes Transmission but Not Summation of Spiking Responses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Yanyun Ren & Xiaobo Bu & Ming Wang & Yue Gong & Junjie Wang & Yuyang Yang & Guijun Li & Meng Zhang & Ye Zhou & Su-Ting Han, 2022. "Synaptic plasticity in self-powered artificial striate cortex for binocular orientation selectivity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Asako Noguchi & Roman Huszár & Shota Morikawa & György Buzsáki & Yuji Ikegaya, 2022. "Inhibition allocates spikes during hippocampal ripples," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Eunhye Cho & Jii Kwon & Gyuwon Lee & Jiwoo Shin & Hyunsu Lee & Suk-Ho Lee & Chun Kee Chung & Jaeyoung Yoon & Won-Kyung Ho, 2024. "Net synaptic drive of fast-spiking interneurons is inverted towards inhibition in human FCD I epilepsy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Giovanni Diana & Thomas T J Sainsbury & Martin P Meyer, 2019. "Bayesian inference of neuronal assemblies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-31, October.
    13. Kyriaki Sidiropoulou & Panayiota Poirazi, 2012. "Predictive Features of Persistent Activity Emergence in Regular Spiking and Intrinsic Bursting Model Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2015. "Self-Organization of Microcircuits in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Plastic Synapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-40, August.
    15. Carina Curto & Vladimir Itskov, 2008. "Cell Groups Reveal Structure of Stimulus Space," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-13, October.
    16. Omer Hazon & Victor H. Minces & David P. Tomàs & Surya Ganguli & Mark J. Schnitzer & Pablo E. Jercog, 2022. "Noise correlations in neural ensemble activity limit the accuracy of hippocampal spatial representations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Barbara Feulner & Matthew G. Perich & Raeed H. Chowdhury & Lee E. Miller & Juan A. Gallego & Claudia Clopath, 2022. "Small, correlated changes in synaptic connectivity may facilitate rapid motor learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Krishna Choudhary & Sven Berberich & Thomas T. G. Hahn & James M. McFarland & Mayank R. Mehta, 2024. "Spontaneous persistent activity and inactivity in vivo reveals differential cortico-entorhinal functional connectivity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Sreedhar S Kumar & Jan Wülfing & Samora Okujeni & Joschka Boedecker & Martin Riedmiller & Ulrich Egert, 2016. "Autonomous Optimization of Targeted Stimulation of Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Einat Granot-Atedgi & Gašper Tkačik & Ronen Segev & Elad Schneidman, 2013. "Stimulus-dependent Maximum Entropy Models of Neural Population Codes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.