IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Random Is Social Behaviour? Disentangling Social Complexity through the Study of a Wild House Mouse Population

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Perony
  • Claudio J Tessone
  • Barbara König
  • Frank Schweitzer

Abstract

Out of all the complex phenomena displayed in the behaviour of animal groups, many are thought to be emergent properties of rather simple decisions at the individual level. Some of these phenomena may also be explained by random processes only. Here we investigate to what extent the interaction dynamics of a population of wild house mice (Mus domesticus) in their natural environment can be explained by a simple stochastic model. We first introduce the notion of perceptual landscape, a novel tool used here to describe the utilisation of space by the mouse colony based on the sampling of individuals in discrete locations. We then implement the behavioural assumptions of the perceptual landscape in a multi-agent simulation to verify their accuracy in the reproduction of observed social patterns. We find that many high-level features – with the exception of territoriality – of our behavioural dataset can be accounted for at the population level through the use of this simplified representation. Our findings underline the potential importance of random factors in the apparent complexity of the mice's social structure. These results resonate in the general context of adaptive behaviour versus elementary environmental interactions. Author Summary: From the synchronised beauty of fish schools to the rigorous hierarchy of ant colonies, animals often display awe-inspiring collective behaviour. In recent years, principles of statistical physics have helped to unveil some simple mechanisms behind the emergence of such collective dynamics. Among the most elementary tools used to explain group behaviour are random processes, a typical example being the so-called “random walk”. In this paper, we have developed a framework based on such random assumptions to study the spatial and social structure of a population of wild house mice. We introduce the concept of perceptual landscape to describe the spatial behaviour of animals, whilst including all sensory and social constraints they are subject to: the perceptual landscape effectively maps the environment of animals as they perceive it. By applying our assumptions to a multi-agent model, we are able to reveal that much of the high-level social behaviour observed in the mouse population can indeed be explained through the many interactions of randomly moving individuals. This raises the question of how much of what we often regard as complex natural phenomena may, in fact, be the result of exceedingly simple forces.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Perony & Claudio J Tessone & Barbara König & Frank Schweitzer, 2012. "How Random Is Social Behaviour? Disentangling Social Complexity through the Study of a Wild House Mouse Population," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002786
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002786
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002786&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Garcia & M. Birbaumer & F. Schweitzer, 2011. "Testing an agent-based model of bacterial cell motility: How nutrient concentration affects speed distribution," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 82(3), pages 235-244, August.
    2. Dion Harmon & Marcus A. M. de Aguiar & David D. Chinellato & Dan Braha & Irving R. Epstein & Yaneer Bar-Yam, 2011. "Predicting economic market crises using measures of collective panic," Papers 1102.2620, arXiv.org.
    3. Simon Benhamou, 2011. "Dynamic Approach to Space and Habitat Use Based on Biased Random Bridges," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, January.
    4. Luca Giuggioli & Jonathan R Potts & Stephen Harris, 2011. "Animal Interactions and the Emergence of Territoriality," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-9, March.
    5. M. A. M. de Aguiar & M. Baranger & E. M. Baptestini & L. Kaufman & Y. Bar-Yam, 2009. "Global patterns of speciation and diversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7253), pages 384-387, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandro Cholaquidis & Ricardo Fraiman & Gábor Lugosi & Beatriz Pateiro-López, 2016. "Set estimation from reflected Brownian motion," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(5), pages 1057-1078, November.
    2. Barbaro, Alethea B.T. & Chayes, Lincoln & D’Orsogna, Maria R., 2013. "Territorial developments based on graffiti: A statistical mechanics approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(1), pages 252-270.
    3. Inês Silva & Matthew Crane & Pongthep Suwanwaree & Colin Strine & Matt Goode, 2018. "Using dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models to identify home range size and movement patterns in king cobras," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Matija Piv{s}korec & Nino Antulov-Fantulin & Petra Kralj Novak & Igor Mozetiv{c} & Miha Grv{c}ar & Irena Vodenska & Tomislav v{S}muc, 2014. "News Cohesiveness: an Indicator of Systemic Risk in Financial Markets," Papers 1402.3483, arXiv.org.
    5. Frank Marten & Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova & Luca Giuggioli, 2012. "Bacterial Secretion and the Role of Diffusive and Subdiffusive First Passage Processes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Daniël Linders & Jan Dhaene & Wim Schoutens, 2015. "Option prices and model-free measurement of implied herd behavior in stock markets," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(02), pages 1-35.
    7. Eder Lucio Fonseca & Fernando F. Ferreira & Paulsamy Muruganandam & Hilda A. Cerdeira, 2012. "Identifying financial crises in real time," Papers 1204.3136, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2012.
    8. Lutnesky, Marvin M.F. & Brown, Thomas R., 2015. "Simulation of movement that potentially maximizes assessment, presence, and defense in territorial animals with varying movement strategies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 50-58.
    9. Freitas, Osmar & Araujo, Sabrina B.L. & Campos, Paulo R.A., 2022. "Speciation in a metapopulation model upon environmental changes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    10. Costa, Carolina L.N. & Marquitti, Flavia M.D. & Perez, S. Ivan & Schneider, David M. & Ramos, Marlon F. & de Aguiar, Marcus A.M., 2018. "Registering the evolutionary history in individual-based models of speciation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 1-14.
    11. Jialin Lei & Yifei Jia & Aojie Zuo & Qing Zeng & Linlu Shi & Yan Zhou & Hong Zhang & Cai Lu & Guangchun Lei & Li Wen, 2019. "Bird Satellite Tracking Revealed Critical Protection Gaps in East Asian–Australasian Flyway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Benjamin Allen & Christine Sample & Yulia Dementieva & Ruben C Medeiros & Christopher Paoletti & Martin A Nowak, 2015. "The Molecular Clock of Neutral Evolution Can Be Accelerated or Slowed by Asymmetric Spatial Structure," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-32, February.
    13. Benoît Desmarchelier & Eddy S. Fang, 2016. "Social Media and the Diffusion of Information: A Computational Experiment on the Emergence of Food Scares," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(4), pages 559-583, November.
    14. Hamza Bodor & Laurent Carlier, 2024. "Stylized Facts and Market Microstructure: An In-Depth Exploration of German Bond Futures Market," Papers 2401.10722, arXiv.org.
    15. Dion Harmon & Marco Lagi & Marcus A M de Aguiar & David D Chinellato & Dan Braha & Irving R Epstein & Yaneer Bar-Yam, 2015. "Anticipating Economic Market Crises Using Measures of Collective Panic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, July.
    16. Sells, Sarah N. & Mitchell, Michael S., 2020. "The economics of territory selection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    17. Dror Y Kenett & Matthias Raddant & Thomas Lux & Eshel Ben-Jacob, 2012. "Evolvement of Uniformity and Volatility in the Stressed Global Financial Village," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-8, February.
    18. Benhamou, Simon & Riotte-Lambert, Louise, 2012. "Beyond the Utilization Distribution: Identifying home range areas that are intensively exploited or repeatedly visited," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 112-116.
    19. Aymeric Vié & Alfredo J. Morales, 2021. "How Connected is Too Connected? Impact of Network Topology on Systemic Risk and Collapse of Complex Economic Systems," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 57(4), pages 1327-1351, April.
    20. Jun-ichi Maskawa & Joshin Murai & Koji Kuroda, 2013. "Market-wide price co-movement around crashes in the Tokyo Stock Exchange," Papers 1306.2188, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.