IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction and Modelling of an Inducible Positive Feedback Loop Stably Integrated in a Mammalian Cell-Line

Author

Listed:
  • Velia Siciliano
  • Filippo Menolascina
  • Lucia Marucci
  • Chiara Fracassi
  • Immacolata Garzilli
  • Maria Nicoletta Moretti
  • Diego di Bernardo

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between topology and dynamics of transcriptional regulatory networks in mammalian cells is essential to elucidate the biology of complex regulatory and signaling pathways. Here, we characterised, via a synthetic biology approach, a transcriptional positive feedback loop (PFL) by generating a clonal population of mammalian cells (CHO) carrying a stable integration of the construct. The PFL network consists of the Tetracycline-controlled transactivator (tTA), whose expression is regulated by a tTA responsive promoter (CMV-TET), thus giving rise to a positive feedback. The same CMV-TET promoter drives also the expression of a destabilised yellow fluorescent protein (d2EYFP), thus the dynamic behaviour can be followed by time-lapse microscopy. The PFL network was compared to an engineered version of the network lacking the positive feedback loop (NOPFL), by expressing the tTA mRNA from a constitutive promoter. Doxycycline was used to repress tTA activation (switch off), and the resulting changes in fluorescence intensity for both the PFL and NOPFL networks were followed for up to 43 h. We observed a striking difference in the dynamics of the PFL and NOPFL networks. Using non-linear dynamical models, able to recapitulate experimental observations, we demonstrated a link between network topology and network dynamics. Namely, transcriptional positive autoregulation can significantly slow down the “switch off” times, as comparared to the nonautoregulatated system. Doxycycline concentration can modulate the response times of the PFL, whereas the NOPFL always switches off with the same dynamics. Moreover, the PFL can exhibit bistability for a range of Doxycycline concentrations. Since the PFL motif is often found in naturally occurring transcriptional and signaling pathways, we believe our work can be instrumental to characterise their behaviour. Author Summary: Synthetic Biology aims at designing and building new biological functions in living organisms. At the same time, Synthetic Biology approaches can be used to uncover the design principles of natural biological systems through the rational construction of simplified regulatory networks. Mathematical models of the networks are then derived from physical considerations and can be used to explain the observed dynamical behaviours. We have characterised a regulatory motif often found in transcriptional and signalling pathways. We constructed a positive feedback loop motif in mammalian cells, consisting of a protein controlling its own expression. We have shown that this motif exhibits a dynamic behaviour which is very different from that obtained when the autoregulation is removed. This difference is intrinsic to the specific wiring diagram chosen by the cell to control its behaviour (feedback versus non-feedback configurations), and can be instrumental in understanding the complex network of regulation occurring in a cell.

Suggested Citation

  • Velia Siciliano & Filippo Menolascina & Lucia Marucci & Chiara Fracassi & Immacolata Garzilli & Maria Nicoletta Moretti & Diego di Bernardo, 2011. "Construction and Modelling of an Inducible Positive Feedback Loop Stably Integrated in a Mammalian Cell-Line," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002074
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002074
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002074&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcel Tigges & Tatiana T. Marquez-Lago & Jörg Stelling & Martin Fussenegger, 2009. "A tunable synthetic mammalian oscillator," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7227), pages 309-312, January.
    2. Jesse Stricker & Scott Cookson & Matthew R. Bennett & William H. Mather & Lev S. Tsimring & Jeff Hasty, 2008. "A fast, robust and tunable synthetic gene oscillator," Nature, Nature, vol. 456(7221), pages 516-519, November.
    3. Michael B. Elowitz & Stanislas Leibler, 2000. "A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6767), pages 335-338, January.
    4. Timothy S. Gardner & Charles R. Cantor & James J. Collins, 2000. "Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6767), pages 339-342, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Peipei & Cai, Shuiming & Liu, Zengrong & Chen, Luonan & Wang, Ruiqi, 2013. "Coupling switches and oscillators as a means to shape cellular signals in biomolecular systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-126.
    2. Lucia Marucci & David A W Barton & Irene Cantone & Maria Aurelia Ricci & Maria Pia Cosma & Stefania Santini & Diego di Bernardo & Mario di Bernardo, 2009. "How to Turn a Genetic Circuit into a Synthetic Tunable Oscillator, or a Bistable Switch," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Miles Miller & Marc Hafner & Eduardo Sontag & Noah Davidsohn & Sairam Subramanian & Priscilla E M Purnick & Douglas Lauffenburger & Ron Weiss, 2012. "Modular Design of Artificial Tissue Homeostasis: Robust Control through Synthetic Cellular Heterogeneity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Evgeni V Nikolaev & Eduardo D Sontag, 2016. "Quorum-Sensing Synchronization of Synthetic Toggle Switches: A Design Based on Monotone Dynamical Systems Theory," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-33, April.
    5. Singh, Vijai & Chaudhary, Dharmendra Kumar & Mani, Indra & Dhar, Pawan Kumar, 2016. "Recent advances and challenges of the use of cyanobacteria towards the production of biofuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Samanthe M Lyons & Wenlong Xu & June Medford & Ashok Prasad, 2014. "Loads Bias Genetic and Signaling Switches in Synthetic and Natural Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Betz, Ulrich A.K. & Arora, Loukik & Assal, Reem A. & Azevedo, Hatylas & Baldwin, Jeremy & Becker, Michael S. & Bostock, Stefan & Cheng, Vinton & Egle, Tobias & Ferrari, Nicola & Schneider-Futschik, El, 2023. "Game changers in science and technology - now and beyond," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Oliver Purcell & Mario di Bernardo & Claire S Grierson & Nigel J Savery, 2011. "A Multi-Functional Synthetic Gene Network: A Frequency Multiplier, Oscillator and Switch," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Sara Hooshangi & William E Bentley, 2011. "LsrR Quorum Sensing “Switch” Is Revealed by a Bottom-Up Approach," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Luna Rizik & Loai Danial & Mouna Habib & Ron Weiss & Ramez Daniel, 2022. "Synthetic neuromorphic computing in living cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Avraham E Mayo & Yaakov Setty & Seagull Shavit & Alon Zaslaver & Uri Alon, 2006. "Plasticity of the cis-Regulatory Input Function of a Gene," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-1, March.
    12. Ci Kong & Yin Yang & Tiancong Qi & Shuyi Zhang, 2025. "Predictive genetic circuit design for phenotype reprogramming in plants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Weiyue Ji & Handuo Shi & Haoqian Zhang & Rui Sun & Jingyi Xi & Dingqiao Wen & Jingchen Feng & Yiwei Chen & Xiao Qin & Yanrong Ma & Wenhan Luo & Linna Deng & Hanchi Lin & Ruofan Yu & Qi Ouyang, 2013. "A Formalized Design Process for Bacterial Consortia That Perform Logic Computing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.
    14. Zhdanov, Vladimir P., 2012. "Periodic perturbation of genetic oscillations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 577-587.
    15. Chen Jia & Ramon Grima, 2024. "Holimap: an accurate and efficient method for solving stochastic gene network dynamics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. T. Ochiai & J. C. Nacher, 2007. "Stochastic analysis of autoregulatory gene expression dynamics," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 377-388, November.
    17. Thomas B. Kepler & Timothy C. Elston, 2001. "Stochasticity in Transcriptional Regulation: Origins, Consequences and Mathematical Representations," Working Papers 01-06-033, Santa Fe Institute.
    18. Luis Mier-y-Terán-Romero & Mary Silber & Vassily Hatzimanikatis, 2010. "The Origins of Time-Delay in Template Biopolymerization Processes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Ashty S. Karim & Dylan M. Brown & Chloé M. Archuleta & Sharisse Grannan & Ludmilla Aristilde & Yogesh Goyal & Josh N. Leonard & Niall M. Mangan & Arthur Prindle & Gabriel J. Rocklin & Keith J. Tyo & L, 2024. "Deconstructing synthetic biology across scales: a conceptual approach for training synthetic biologists," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Simeon D. Castle & Michiel Stock & Thomas E. Gorochowski, 2024. "Engineering is evolution: a perspective on design processes to engineer biology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.