IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computational Models of the Notch Network Elucidate Mechanisms of Context-dependent Signaling

Author

Listed:
  • Smita Agrawal
  • Colin Archer
  • David V Schaffer

Abstract

The Notch signaling pathway controls numerous cell fate decisions during development and adulthood through diverse mechanisms. Thus, whereas it functions as an oscillator during somitogenesis, it can mediate an all-or-none cell fate switch to influence pattern formation in various tissues during development. Furthermore, while in some contexts continuous Notch signaling is required, in others a transient Notch signal is sufficient to influence cell fate decisions. However, the signaling mechanisms that underlie these diverse behaviors in different cellular contexts have not been understood. Notch1 along with two downstream transcription factors hes1 and RBP-Jk forms an intricate network of positive and negative feedback loops, and we have implemented a systems biology approach to computationally study this gene regulation network. Our results indicate that the system exhibits bistability and is capable of switching states at a critical level of Notch signaling initiated by its ligand Delta in a particular range of parameter values. In this mode, transient activation of Delta is also capable of inducing prolonged high expression of Hes1, mimicking the “ON” state depending on the intensity and duration of the signal. Furthermore, this system is highly sensitive to certain model parameters and can transition from functioning as a bistable switch to an oscillator by tuning a single parameter value. This parameter, the transcriptional repression constant of hes1, can thus qualitatively govern the behavior of the signaling network. In addition, we find that the system is able to dampen and reduce the effects of biological noise that arise from stochastic effects in gene expression for systems that respond quickly to Notch signaling. This work thus helps our understanding of an important cell fate control system and begins to elucidate how this context dependent signaling system can be modulated in different cellular settings to exhibit entirely different behaviors. Author Summary: The Notch signaling pathway is an evolutionarily conserved signaling system that is involved in various cell fate decisions, both during development of an organism and during adulthood. While the same core circuit functions in various different cellular contexts, it has experimentally been shown to elicit varied behaviors and responses. On the one hand, it functions as a cellular oscillator critical for somitogenesis, whereas in other situations, it can function as a cell fate switch to pattern developing tissue, for example in the Drosophila eye. Furthermore, malfunctioning of Notch signaling is implicated in various cancers. To better understand the underlying mechanisms that allow the network to function distinctly in different contexts, we have mathematically modeled the behavior of the Notch network, encompassing the Notch gene along with two of its downstream effector transcription factors, which together form a network of positive and negative feedback loops. Our results indicate that the qualitative and quantitative behavior of the system can readily be tuned based on key parameters to reflect its multiple roles. Furthermore, our results provide insights into alterations in the signaling system that lead to malfunction and hence disease, which could be used to identify potential drug targets for therapy.

Suggested Citation

  • Smita Agrawal & Colin Archer & David V Schaffer, 2009. "Computational Models of the Notch Network Elucidate Mechanisms of Context-dependent Signaling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000390
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000390
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000390&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Cinquin, 2007. "Repressor Dimerization in the Zebrafish Somitogenesis Clock," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(2), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Christopher V. Rao & Denise M. Wolf & Adam P. Arkin, 2002. "Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise," Nature, Nature, vol. 420(6912), pages 231-237, November.
    3. Manuel Barrio & Kevin Burrage & André Leier & Tianhai Tian, 2006. "Oscillatory Regulation of Hes1: Discrete Stochastic Delay Modelling and Simulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(9), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yichen Li & Yumin Li & Hui Zhang & Yong Chen, 2011. "MicroRNA-Mediated Positive Feedback Loop and Optimized Bistable Switch in a Cancer Network Involving miR-17-92," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-9, October.
    2. Junjie Luo & Jun Wang & Ting Martin Ma & Zhirong Sun, 2010. "Reverse Engineering of Bacterial Chemotaxis Pathway via Frequency Domain Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-8, March.
    3. Ankit Gupta & Mustafa Khammash, 2022. "Frequency spectra and the color of cellular noise," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Lucy Ham & Megan A. Coomer & Kaan Öcal & Ramon Grima & Michael P. H. Stumpf, 2024. "A stochastic vs deterministic perspective on the timing of cellular events," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Burton W Andrews & Pablo A Iglesias, 2007. "An Information-Theoretic Characterization of the Optimal Gradient Sensing Response of Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-9, August.
    6. Arantxa Urchueguía & Luca Galbusera & Dany Chauvin & Gwendoline Bellement & Thomas Julou & Erik van Nimwegen, 2021. "Genome-wide gene expression noise in Escherichia coli is condition-dependent and determined by propagation of noise through the regulatory network," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Mark Hallen & Bochong Li & Yu Tanouchi & Cheemeng Tan & Mike West & Lingchong You, 2011. "Computation of Steady-State Probability Distributions in Stochastic Models of Cellular Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Katri Hituri & Marja-Leena Linne, 2013. "Comparison of Models for IP3 Receptor Kinetics Using Stochastic Simulations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, April.
    9. David M Holloway & Francisco J P Lopes & Luciano da Fontoura Costa & Bruno A N Travençolo & Nina Golyandina & Konstantin Usevich & Alexander V Spirov, 2011. "Gene Expression Noise in Spatial Patterning: hunchback Promoter Structure Affects Noise Amplitude and Distribution in Drosophila Segmentation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Ankit Gupta & Corentin Briat & Mustafa Khammash, 2014. "A Scalable Computational Framework for Establishing Long-Term Behavior of Stochastic Reaction Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Lucia Marucci & David A W Barton & Irene Cantone & Maria Aurelia Ricci & Maria Pia Cosma & Stefania Santini & Diego di Bernardo & Mario di Bernardo, 2009. "How to Turn a Genetic Circuit into a Synthetic Tunable Oscillator, or a Bistable Switch," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Chanu, Athokpam Langlen & Singh, R.K. Brojen & Jeon, Jae-Hyung, 2024. "Exploring the interplay of intrinsic fluctuation and complexity in intracellular calcium dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    13. Antrea Pavlou & Eugenio Cinquemani & Corinne Pinel & Nils Giordano & Van Melle-Gateau Mathilde & Irina Mihalcescu & Johannes Geiselmann & Hidde Jong, 2025. "Single-cell data reveal heterogeneity of investment in ribosomes across a bacterial population," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Singh, Shakti Nath & Chanu, Athokpam Langlen & Malik, Md. Zubbair & Singh, R.K. Brojen, 2021. "Interplay of cellular states: Role of delay as control mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    15. Thounaojam, Umeshkanta Singh, 2022. "Stochastic chaos in chemical Lorenz system: Interplay of intrinsic noise and nonlinearity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    16. Shuangyu Bi & Manika Kargeti & Remy Colin & Niklas Farke & Hannes Link & Victor Sourjik, 2023. "Dynamic fluctuations in a bacterial metabolic network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Ming Wu & Xuerui Yang & Christina Chan, 2009. "A Dynamic Analysis of IRS-PKR Signaling in Liver Cells: A Discrete Modeling Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Alan J Terry & Marc Sturrock & J Kim Dale & Miguel Maroto & Mark A J Chaplain, 2011. "A Spatio-Temporal Model of Notch Signalling in the Zebrafish Segmentation Clock: Conditions for Synchronised Oscillatory Dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Jordi Heijman & Antonio Zaza & Daniel M Johnson & Yoram Rudy & Ralf L M Peeters & Paul G A Volders & Ronald L Westra, 2013. "Determinants of Beat-to-Beat Variability of Repolarization Duration in the Canine Ventricular Myocyte: A Computational Analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Burton W Andrews & Tau-Mu Yi & Pablo A Iglesias, 2006. "Optimal Noise Filtering in the Chemotactic Response of Escherichia coli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-12, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.