IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/1001266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neural Mechanisms Underlying Motivation of Mental Versus Physical Effort

Author

Listed:
  • Liane Schmidt
  • Maël Lebreton
  • Marie-Laure Cléry-Melin
  • Jean Daunizeau
  • Mathias Pessiglione

Abstract

Mental and physical efforts, such as paying attention and lifting weights, have been shown to involve different brain systems. These cognitive and motor systems, respectively, include cortical networks (prefronto-parietal and precentral regions) as well as subregions of the dorsal basal ganglia (caudate and putamen). Both systems appeared sensitive to incentive motivation: their activity increases when we work for higher rewards. Another brain system, including the ventral prefrontal cortex and the ventral basal ganglia, has been implicated in encoding expected rewards. How this motivational system drives the cognitive and motor systems remains poorly understood. More specifically, it is unclear whether cognitive and motor systems can be driven by a common motivational center or if they are driven by distinct, dedicated motivational modules. To address this issue, we used functional MRI to scan healthy participants while performing a task in which incentive motivation, cognitive, and motor demands were varied independently. We reasoned that a common motivational node should (1) represent the reward expected from effort exertion, (2) correlate with the performance attained, and (3) switch effective connectivity between cognitive and motor regions depending on task demand. The ventral striatum fulfilled all three criteria and therefore qualified as a common motivational node capable of driving both cognitive and motor regions of the dorsal striatum. Thus, we suggest that the interaction between a common motivational system and the different task-specific systems underpinning behavioral performance might occur within the basal ganglia. Author Summary: Incentive motivation refers to the process in the brain by which we translate the expectation of a potential reward into the effort required to do an action, as for instance when the expected paycheck brings the employee to work. Different types of effort can be implemented in everyday life, some being more cognitive, like paying attention, and others more motor-involved, like lifting weights. Reward, cognitive, and motor representations are known to rely on distinct regions of the frontal cortex and basal ganglia. However, how expected rewards motivate these different types of efforts remains poorly understood. Here, we addressed this question by developing a functional neuroimaging approach where we independently varied a monetary reward as well as the cognitive and motor demand of the task. Our results suggest that the expectation of a reward is encoded in the ventral striatum, which can then drive either the motor or cognitive part of the dorsal striatum, depending on the task, in order to boost behavioral performance. We conclude that intra-striatal effective connectivity may explain how both motor and cognitive efforts can be driven by a single motivational module.

Suggested Citation

  • Liane Schmidt & Maël Lebreton & Marie-Laure Cléry-Melin & Jean Daunizeau & Mathias Pessiglione, 2012. "Neural Mechanisms Underlying Motivation of Mental Versus Physical Effort," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1001266
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001266
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001266&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johan Lauwereyns & Katsumi Watanabe & Brian Coe & Okihide Hikosaka, 2002. "A neural correlate of response bias in monkey caudate nucleus," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6896), pages 413-417, July.
    2. Karl Friston, 2009. "Causal Modelling and Brain Connectivity in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-6, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Westbrook & Daria Kester & Todd S Braver, 2013. "What Is the Subjective Cost of Cognitive Effort? Load, Trait, and Aging Effects Revealed by Economic Preference," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-8, July.
    2. Laurel S Morris & Agnes Norbury & Derek A Smith & Neil A Harrison & Valerie Voon & James W Murrough, 2020. "Dissociating self-generated volition from externally-generated motivation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Söderlund, Magnus & Sagfossen, Sofie, 2017. "The consumer experience: The impact of supplier effort and consumer effort on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 219-229.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Yingyao & Kayaba, Yutaka & Shum, Matthew, 2013. "Nonparametric learning rules from bandit experiments: The eyes have it!," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 215-231.
    2. Wei Tang & Steven L Bressler & Chad M Sylvester & Gordon L Shulman & Maurizio Corbetta, 2012. "Measuring Granger Causality between Cortical Regions from Voxelwise fMRI BOLD Signals with LASSO," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Bruno B Averbeck & Moonsang Seo, 2008. "The Statistical Neuroanatomy of Frontal Networks in the Macaque," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Oscar Miranda-Dominguez & Brian D Mills & Samuel D Carpenter & Kathleen A Grant & Christopher D Kroenke & Joel T Nigg & Damien A Fair, 2014. "Connectotyping: Model Based Fingerprinting of the Functional Connectome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Tian Ge & Keith M Kendrick & Jianfeng Feng, 2009. "A Novel Extended Granger Causal Model Approach Demonstrates Brain Hemispheric Differences during Face Recognition Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Vasilii V. Kuimov & Konstantin V. Simonov & Eva V. Shcherbenko & Liudmila V. Iushkova, 2023. "Ecosystems and Their Digital Models as Factors of Algocognitive Culture and Transition to New Technological Order," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, March.
    7. Qiang Luo & Tian Ge & Fabian Grabenhorst & Jianfeng Feng & Edmund T Rolls, 2013. "Attention-Dependent Modulation of Cortical Taste Circuits Revealed by Granger Causality with Signal-Dependent Noise," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Luca M. Possati, 2021. "Freud and the algorithm: neuropsychoanalysis as a framework to understand artificial general intelligence," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. repec:jss:jstsof:44:i13 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Will D Penny & Klaas E Stephan & Jean Daunizeau & Maria J Rosa & Karl J Friston & Thomas M Schofield & Alex P Leff, 2010. "Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1001266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.