Author
Listed:
- Guichuan Zhou
(Sichuan University)
- Kui Zheng
(Sichuan University)
- Anni Liu
(Sichuan University)
Abstract
In this rapidly developing and technologically advancing business environment, innovation has become crucial to an organization’s success. However, very few studies have explored the effect of organizational stigma, a negative label that becomes prevalent and situational in nature, on employees’ innovative performance. Using survey data from 151 employees in the overseas business departments of five Chinese multinational enterprises blacklisted by the U.S. government, along with one-on-one follow-up interviews with 17 participants, this study uncovers a psychological mechanism behind the negative relationship between organizational stigma and employees’ innovative performance. Specifically, organizational stigma prompts employees to engage in surface acting, which further leads to emotional exhaustion as employees are unable to replenish their emotional resources due to the negative experience of organizational stigma. This emotional exhaustion, in turn, diminishes the emotional resources employees can devote to innovative behaviors, resulting in a decline in their innovative performance. Moreover, this study identifies stigma attribution as a moderating factor, where employees who attribute stigma to positive appraisal-related causes experience a lesser decrease in their innovative performance. By combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews, this study not only helps bridge the gap in understanding the impact of organizational stigma at the relatively unexplored employee level, including its underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions, but also offers practical insights for managers on how to mitigate the negative effects of organizational stigma on employees’ innovative performance.
Suggested Citation
Guichuan Zhou & Kui Zheng & Anni Liu, 2024.
"How does organizational stigma damage employees’ innovative performance? An emotional labor perspective,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04134-7
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-04134-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04134-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.