IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04500383.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

“I Love It” Versus “I Recommend It”: The Impact of Implicit and Explicit Endorsement Styles on Electronic Word-of-Mouth Persuasiveness

Author

Listed:
  • J. Liao
  • S. He
  • W. Feng
  • R. Filieri

    (Audencia Business School)

Abstract

Consumers usually endorse tourism products differently when sharing positive electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). This research examines the relative persuasiveness of two endorsement styles, that is, explicit endorsement (e.g., ‘‘I recommend it'') and implicit endorsement (e.g., ‘‘I love it''). Drawing on the persuasion knowledge model, we propose that explicit endorsements are less persuasive than implicit endorsements because the former trigger stronger persuasion knowledge. We further argue that source trustworthiness mitigates the persuasion effect difference between the two endorsement styles. This article assesses these hypotheses across different sources (anonymous reviewers, friends, influencers), channels (online community, social commerce platform, social networking app), and products (hotels, restaurants) using secondary data analysis and two experiments. Three studies provide support for our hypotheses. By revealing the relationship between endorsement styles and eWOM persuasiveness, this article provides important implications for implementing effective product endorsement.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Liao & S. He & W. Feng & R. Filieri, 2024. "“I Love It” Versus “I Recommend It”: The Impact of Implicit and Explicit Endorsement Styles on Electronic Word-of-Mouth Persuasiveness," Post-Print hal-04500383, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04500383
    DOI: 10.1177/00472875231175083
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04500383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04500383/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00472875231175083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pyle, Martin A. & Smith, Andrew N. & Chevtchouk, Yanina, 2021. "In eWOM we trust: Using naïve theories to understand consumer trust in a complex eWOM marketspace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 145-158.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Román, Sergio & Riquelme, Isabel P. & Iacobucci, Dawn, 2023. "Fake or credible? Antecedents and consequences of perceived credibility in exaggerated online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Tapish Panwar & Kalim Khan, 2022. "Role of Trust in Influencing Service Recommendation from Customers for Beauty Service Industry," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 21(1), pages 19-30, June.
    3. Duygu Akdevelioglu & Selcan Kara & Victor Perotti, 2024. "The impact of consumer personality and social network position on brand community engagement," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(3), pages 235-250, May.
    4. Lim, Weng Marc & Ahmed, Pervaiz Khalid & Ali, Md Yunus, 2022. "Giving electronic word of mouth (eWOM) as a prepurchase behavior: The case of online group buying," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 582-604.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    endorsement styles; electronic word-of-mouth; persuasion; source trustworthiness; persuasion knowledge; linguistic effects;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04500383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.