IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03506-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of interactional metadiscourse markers by Saudi EFL male and female college students: the case of a gender-sensitive topic

Author

Listed:
  • Ghuzayyil Mohammed Al-Otaibi

    (King Saud University)

  • Abeer Abdulhadi Hussain

    (King Saud University)

Abstract

A few studies have explored the use of interactional metadiscourse markers in argumentative writing by male and female college students. More importantly, none explored the topic of metadiscourse resources with respect to gender-sensitive topics. Thus, the present study aims at examining the exploitation of interactional metadiscourse markers by Saudi male and female English as a Foreign Language (EFL) college students in their writing about ‘Who are Better Drivers, Men or Women?’. The study is corpus-based on students’ essays. The corpus consists of four sub-corpora: (a) men favouring men, (b) men arguing for women, (c) women arguing for men and (d) women writing in favour of women. We followed a qualitative and quantitative approach to data analysis. Using AntConc and Hyland’s (2005) metadiscourse model of interactional markers, the results reveal that female writers employed attitudinal lexis, hedges, self-mentions and boosters more than male writers. As for the variables of gender and stance choice, females arguing for men’s driving significantly utilised hedges more than the other three groups. Additionally, female writers writing in support of female drivers significantly used self-mentions more than male writers arguing for men’s driving. This study shows that sensitive topics may cause a difference in the distribution of metadiscourse markers used by people of both genders, and it provides some pedagogical implications for EFL instructors and curriculum developers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghuzayyil Mohammed Al-Otaibi & Abeer Abdulhadi Hussain, 2024. "The use of interactional metadiscourse markers by Saudi EFL male and female college students: the case of a gender-sensitive topic," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03506-3
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03506-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03506-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03506-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graeme D. Ruxton, 2006. "The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann--Whitney U test," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(4), pages 688-690, July.
    2. Jian-E Peng & Yuting Zheng, 2021. "Metadiscourse and Voice Construction in Discussion Sections in BA Theses by Chinese University Students Majoring in English," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    3. Tarek Assassi & Kenza Merghmi, 2023. "Formulaic Sequences and Meta-Discourse Markers in Applied Linguistics Research Papers. A cross-linguistic corpus-based analysis of native and non-native authors’ published articles," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 27, pages 154-175, January.
    4. Ismat Jabeen & Hind Shujaa S. Almutairi & Hend Naif H. Almutairi, 2023. "Interaction in Research Discourse: A Comparative Study of the Use of Hedges and Boosters in PhD Theses by Australian and Saudi Writers," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(8), pages 119-119, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tamar Balgiashvili, 2017. "Comparing Entrepreneurial Passion of Social and Commercial Entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(4), pages 45-61.
    2. Charles Bettembourg & Christian Diot & Olivier Dameron, 2015. "Optimal Threshold Determination for Interpreting Semantic Similarity and Particularity: Application to the Comparison of Gene Sets and Metabolic Pathways Using GO and ChEBI," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-30, July.
    3. Isaías Martín-Ruiz & María-José Robles-Sánchez & Agustín Wallace, 2024. "Influence of Educational Measures on Emotional Adjustment in Students with and without Specific Learning Difficulties according to Gender," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Sugato Chakravarty & S. M. Zahid Iqbal & Abu Zafar M. Shahriar, 2013. "Are Women “Naturally” Better Credit Risks in Microcredit? Evidence from Field Experiments in Patriarchal and Matrilineal Societies in Bangladesh," Working Papers 1019, Purdue University, Department of Consumer Sciences.
    5. Thorsten Hens & Trine Nordlie, 2024. "How good are LLMs in risk profiling?," KIER Working Papers 1103, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    6. Nithya Shankar-Krishnan & Albert Fornieles Deu & David Sánchez-Carracedo, 2021. "Associations Between Food Insecurity And Psychological Wellbeing, Body Image, Disordered Eating And Dietary Habits: Evidence From Spanish Adolescents," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(1), pages 163-183, February.
    7. Dissanayake, Sunanda & Shams, Alireza, 2016. "Safety Evaluation of Shoulder Bypass Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections on Rural Two-Lane Roadways Using Cross Sectional Analysis," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 55(3), December.
    8. Stock-Homburg, Ruth, 2024. "Survey of Emotions in Human–Robot Interactions: Perspectives from Robotic Psychology on 20 Years of Research," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 149448, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Vlaeminck, Pieter & Vandoren, Jana & Vranken, Liesbet, 2014. "Are labels delivering what they intend? Explicit value of fair-trade labels versus implicit value of fair trade characteristics," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182941, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Jinxiu Liu & Weihao Shen & Yaqian He, 2021. "Effects of Cropland Expansion on Temperature Extremes in Western India from 1982 to 2015," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    11. McKendall, Sherron Benson & McKendall, Alan & Chester, Ann, 2023. "The development and validation of an academic, work health sciences, and community intentions scale for out-of-school-time (OST) participants," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Menusch Khadjavi & Andreas Lange, 2015. "Doing good or doing harm: experimental evidence on giving and taking in public good games," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(3), pages 432-441, September.
    13. Zhengnan Zhu & Zhe Zhang & Fangqing Liu & Zewei Chen & Yuxin Ren & Qingfu Guo, 2023. "Study on Accuracy Evaluation of MCD19A2 and Spatiotemporal Distribution of AOD in Arid Zones of Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Ma, Qiuhui & Zheng, Ying & Yang, Weidong & Zhang, Yong & Zhang, Hong, 2021. "Remaining useful life prediction of lithium battery based on capacity regeneration point detection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    15. Vlaeminck, Pieter & Vranken, Liesbet, 2015. "Do labels capture consumers’ actual willingness to pay for Fair Trade characteristics?," Working Papers 206438, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    16. Timothy J. Fullman & Erin L. Bunting, 2014. "Analyzing Vegetation Change in an Elephant-Impacted Landscape Using the Moving Standard Deviation Index," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-31, January.
    17. Patrizia Gazzola & Audrey Paterson & Stefano Amelio & Daniele Grechi & Stefano Cristina, 2023. "The role of individual social responsibility and corporate social responsibility in the tax fraud war: A comparison between the priorities of Italian and Romanian consumers," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2265-2277, September.
    18. Jie Hua & Guohua Wang & Maolin Huang & Shuyang Hua & Shuanghe Yang, 2020. "A Visual Approach for the SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) Outbreak Data Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Crea, Thomas M. & Neville, Sarah E. & Diaz-Valdes, Antonia & Evans, Kerri & Urizar, Brenda & Drummer, Emily & Acevedo, Jose & Canelas, Olga & Medina, Marlon & Mallman, Jennifer, 2021. "The McGovern-Dole food for education and Child nutrition program (MGD): A comparative analysis of reading comprehension gains in Central America," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    20. Heimir Thorisson & Marwan Alsultan & Daniel Hendrickson & Thomas L. Polmateer & James H. Lambert, 2019. "Addressing schedule disruptions in business processes of advanced logistics systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 66-79, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03506-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.