IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03296-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional differences of agricultural total factor carbon efficiency in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiuquan Huang

    (Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine
    Macao Polytechnic University)

  • Tao Zhang

    (Macao Polytechnic University)

  • Xi Wang

    (Macao Polytechnic University)

  • Jiansong Zheng

    (Macao Polytechnic University)

  • Guoli Xu

    (Macao Polytechnic University)

  • Xiaoshan Wu

    (Macao Polytechnic University)

Abstract

China’s agriculture has struggled over the past century to produce more food to feed the country’s expanding population while also contending with high-intensity pollution. In order to support China’s transition to low-carbon agriculture more efficiently, it is important to improve the efficiency of agricultural carbon emissions. This study employs the biennial weight modified Russell model to investigate China’s agricultural total factor carbon efficiency (ATFCE) during 1999–2018 and its differences between the three agricultural functional zones (AFZs), including the grain-producing zone (GPZ), the grain balance zone (GBZ), and the main grain-selling zone (GSZ). The study found that the ATFCE in China was 0.761, a high value. GSZ (0.9865) had the highest ATFCE, followed by GBZ (0.7201) and GPZ (0.6666). ATFCE in China fell by approximately 25%, from 0.825 in 1999 to 0.6983 in 2018. Further, the provinces with the highest ATFCE included Tibet (0.9997), Hainan (0.9981), Shanghai (0.997), Beijing (0.9937), and Jiangsu (0.9924). Provinces with the lowest ATFCEs included Hubei (0.4743), Yunnan (0.4645), Hunan (0.441), Anhui (0.4295), Heilongjiang (0.4130), and Jiangxi (0.3354). In addition, the difference in ATFCE within the whole of China, GPZ, and GBZ generally widened during 1999–2018. There was a rise in all three inequalities between the three AFZs. The difference between GPZ and GBZ was the greatest among the three interregional differences. Finally, the difference between subregions was the largest source of the total difference (43.66%), followed by the difference within subregions (30.04%) and the intensity of transvariation (25.94%).

Suggested Citation

  • Xiuquan Huang & Tao Zhang & Xi Wang & Jiansong Zheng & Guoli Xu & Xiaoshan Wu, 2024. "Regional differences of agricultural total factor carbon efficiency in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03296-8
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03296-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03296-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03296-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Greene, 2010. "A stochastic frontier model with correction for sample selection," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 15-24, August.
    2. Fang, Tao & Fang, Debin & Yu, Bolin, 2022. "Carbon emission efficiency of thermal power generation in China: Empirical evidence from the micro-perspective of power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    3. Losa, Eduardo Tola & Arjomandi, Amir & Hervé Dakpo, K. & Bloomfield, Jason, 2020. "Efficiency comparison of airline groups in Annex 1 and non-Annex 1 countries: A dynamic network DEA approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 163-174.
    4. Rajiv D. Banker & Hsihui Chang & Zhiqiang Zheng, 2017. "On the use of super-efficiency procedures for ranking efficient units and identifying outliers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(1), pages 21-35, March.
    5. Quah, D., 1990. "Galton'S Fallacy And The Tests Of The Convergence Hypothesis," Working papers 552, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
    6. Halkos, George Emm. & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2009. "Exploring the existence of Kuznets curve in countries' environmental efficiency using DEA window analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 2168-2176, May.
    7. Fujii, Hidemichi & Managi, Shunsuke & Matousek, Roman, 2014. "Indian bank efficiency and productivity changes with undesirable outputs: A disaggregated approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 41-50.
    8. Xingle Long & Yusen Luo & Huaping Sun & Gang Tian, 2018. "Fertilizer using intensity and environmental efficiency for China’s agriculture sector from 1997 to 2014," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1573-1591, July.
    9. Khezrimotlagh, Dariush & Cook, Wade D. & Zhu, Joe, 2020. "A nonparametric framework to detect outliers in estimating production frontiers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 375-388.
    10. Guoyong Wu & Yu Xie & Haoxin Li & Noman Riaz, 2022. "Agricultural Ecological Efficiency under the Carbon Emissions Trading System in China: A Spatial Difference-in-Difference Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Janvry, Alain de & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 2001. "Income Strategies Among Rural Households in Mexico: The Role of Off-farm Activities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 467-480, March.
    12. Xiaohua Yu, 2018. "Engel curve, farmer welfare and food consumption in 40 years of rural China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 65-77, February.
    13. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Weber, William L., 2009. "A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 274-287, December.
    14. MacLeod, Michael & Moran, Dominic & Eory, Vera & Rees, R.M. & Barnes, Andrew & Topp, Cairistiona F.E. & Ball, Bruce & Hoad, Steve & Wall, Eileen & McVittie, Alistair & Pajot, Guillaume & Matthews, Rob, 2010. "Developing greenhouse gas marginal abatement cost curves for agricultural emissions from crops and soils in the UK," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(4), pages 198-209, May.
    15. Pastor, Jesús T. & Asmild, Mette & Lovell, C.A. Knox, 2011. "The biennial Malmquist productivity change index," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 10-15, March.
    16. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Jiang, Lin & Shi, Wei, 2020. "Exploring the growth-adjusted energy-emission efficiency of transportation industry in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. repec:bla:scandj:v:98:y:1996:i:2:p:303-13 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Mahinda Senevi Gunaratne & R. B. Radin Firdaus & Shamila Indika Rathnasooriya, 2021. "Climate change and food security in Sri Lanka: towards food sovereignty," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Po-Chi Chen & Ming-Miin Yu & Ching-Cheng Chang & Shih-Hsun Hsu & Shunsuke Managi, 2015. "Nonradial Directional Performance Measurement with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to OECD and Non-OECD Countries," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 481-520.
    20. Hong-Oanh Nguyen & Hong-Van Nguyen & Young-Tae Chang & Anthony T. H. Chin & Jose Tongzon, 2016. "Measuring port efficiency using bootstrapped DEA: the case of Vietnamese ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 644-659, July.
    21. Fan, Jing-Li & Zhang, Hao & Zhang, Xian, 2020. "Unified efficiency measurement of coal-fired power plants in China considering group heterogeneity and technological gaps," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    22. Yong Zhu & Congjia Huo, 2022. "The Impact of Agricultural Production Efficiency on Agricultural Carbon Emissions in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    23. Ball, V. Eldon & Lovell, C.A. Knox & Luu, H. & Nehring, Richard F., 2004. "Incorporating Environmental Impacts in the Measurement of Agricultural Productivity Growth," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(3), pages 1-25, December.
    24. Lim, Dong-Joon, 2016. "Inverse DEA with frontier changes for new product target setting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 510-516.
    25. Battese, G E & Coelli, T J, 1995. "A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 325-332.
    26. Thomas Bournaris & George Vlontzos & Christina Moulogianni, 2019. "Efficiency of Vegetables Produced in Glasshouses: The Impact of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in Land Management Decision Making," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.
    27. Shih-Liang Chao, 2017. "Integrating multi-stage data envelopment analysis and a fuzzy analytical hierarchical process to evaluate the efficiency of major global liner shipping companies," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 496-511, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Guangtian & Wang, Bing & Zhang, Ning, 2016. "A coin has two sides: Which one is driving China’s green TFP growth?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 481-498.
    2. Henriques, Carla Oliveira & Lima, Alexandre & Nguyen, Duc Khuong & Neves, Maria Elisabete, 2024. "Assessing the vulnerability of oil-dependent countries in Europe," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. An, Qingxian & Tao, Xiangyang & Xiong, Beibei & Chen, Xiaohong, 2022. "Frontier-based incentive mechanisms for allocating common revenues or fixed costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 294-308.
    4. Subal C. Kumbhakar & Christopher F. Parmeter & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2022. "Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Foundations and Advances I," Springer Books, in: Subhash C. Ray & Robert G. Chambers & Subal C. Kumbhakar (ed.), Handbook of Production Economics, chapter 8, pages 331-370, Springer.
    5. Asante, Bright Owusu & Villano, Renato A. & Battese, George E., 2014. "The effect of the adoption of yam minisett technology on the technical efficiency of yam farmers in the forest-savanna transition zone of Ghana," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Nikos Chatzistamoulou & Kounetas Kostas & Antonakis Theodor, 2022. "Salary Cap, Organizational Gap, and Catch-up in the Performance of NBA Teams: A Two-Stage DEA Model Under Heterogeneity," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 23(2), pages 123-155, February.
    7. Koiry, Subrata & Huang, Wei, 2023. "Do ecological protection approaches affect total factor productivity change of cropland production in Sweden?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Higgins, Daniel & Arslan, Aslihan, 2020. "Irrigation infrastructure and farm productivity in the Philippines: A stochastic Meta-Frontier analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Zainab Oyetunde-Usman & Kehinde Oluseyi Olagunju, 2019. "Determinants of Food Security and Technical Efficiency among Agricultural Households in Nigeria," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-13, October.
    10. Shutian Cui & Renlong Wang, 2024. "A Novel {\delta}-SBM-OPA Approach for Policy-Driven Analysis of Carbon Emission Efficiency under Uncertainty in the Chinese Industrial Sector," Papers 2408.11600, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    11. Kounetas, Konstantinos & Zervopoulos, Panagiotis D., 2019. "A cross-country evaluation of environmental performance: Is there a convergence-divergence pattern in technology gaps?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1136-1148.
    12. Li, Gao & Ruonan, Li & Yingdan, Mei & Xiaoli, Zhao, 2022. "Improve technical efficiency of China's coal-fired power enterprises: Taking a coal-fired-withdrawl context," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    13. Shiyi Chen & Wolfgang K. Härdle & Li Wang, 2020. "Estimation and determinants of Chinese banks’ total factor efficiency: a new vision based on unbalanced development of Chinese banks and their overall risk," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 427-468, June.
    14. Juo, Jia-Ching & Fu, Tsu-Tan & Yu, Ming-Miin & Lin, Yu-Hui, 2016. "Non-radial profit performance: An application to Taiwanese banks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 111-121.
    15. Sabri Boubaker & T.D.Q. Le & T. Ngo, 2023. "Managing Bank Performance under COVID-19: A Novel Inverse DEA Efficiency Approach," Post-Print hal-04435441, HAL.
    16. Edward Martey & Wilson Dogbe & Prince Etwire & Alexander Wiredu, 2015. "Impact of Farmer Mentorship Project on Farm Efficiency and Income in Rural Ghana," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(10), pages 1-79, September.
    17. Wei, Chu & Löschel, Andreas & Liu, Bing, 2015. "Energy-saving and emission-abatement potential of Chinese coal-fired power enterprise: A non-parametric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 33-43.
    18. Silva, Thiago Christiano & Tabak, Benjamin Miranda & Cajueiro, Daniel Oliveira & Dias, Marina Villas Boas, 2018. "Adequacy of deterministic and parametric frontiers to analyze the efficiency of Indian commercial banks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 1016-1025.
    19. Muratbek Baglan & Gershom Endelani Mwalupaso & Xue Zhou & Xianhui Geng, 2020. "Towards Cleaner Production: Certified Seed Adoption and Its Effect on Technical Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Dongdong Lu & Zilong Wang, 2023. "Towards green economic recovery: how to improve green total factor productivity," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3163-3185, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03296-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.