IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2408.11600.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Novel $\delta$-SBM-OPA Approach for Policy-Driven Analysis of Carbon Emission Efficiency under Uncertainty in the Chinese Industrial Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Shutian Cui
  • Renlong Wang
  • Xiaoyan Li

Abstract

Regional differences in carbon emission efficiency arise from disparities in resource distribution, industrial structure, and development level, which are often influenced by government policy preferences. However, currently, most studies fail to consider the impact of government policy preferences and data uncertainty on carbon emission efficiency. To address the above limitations, this study proposes a hybrid model based on $\delta$-slack-based model ($\delta$-SBM) and ordinal priority approach (OPA) for measuring carbon emission efficiency driven by government policy preferences under data uncertainty. The proposed $\delta$-SBM-OPA model incorporates constraints on the importance of input and output variables under different policy preference scenarios. It then develops the efficiency optimization model with Farrell frontiers and efficiency tapes to deal with the data uncertainty in input and output variables. This study demonstrates the proposed model by analyzing industrial carbon emission efficiency of Chinese provinces in 2021. It examines the carbon emission efficiency and corresponding clustering results of provinces under three types of policies: economic priority, environmental priority, and technological priority, with varying priority preferences. The results indicate that the carbon emission efficiency of the 30 provinces can mainly be categorized into technology-driven, development-balanced, and transition-potential types, with most provinces achieving optimal efficiency under the technology-dominant preferences across all policy scenarios. Ultimately, this study suggests a tailored roadmap and crucial initiatives for different provinces to progressively and systematically work towards achieving the low carbon goal.

Suggested Citation

  • Shutian Cui & Renlong Wang & Xiaoyan Li, 2024. "A Novel $\delta$-SBM-OPA Approach for Policy-Driven Analysis of Carbon Emission Efficiency under Uncertainty in the Chinese Industrial Sector," Papers 2408.11600, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2408.11600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.11600
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fang, Tao & Fang, Debin & Yu, Bolin, 2022. "Carbon emission efficiency of thermal power generation in China: Empirical evidence from the micro-perspective of power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Arabmaldar, Aliasghar & Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Loske, Dominic & Hammerschmidt, Maik & Klumpp, Matthias, 2024. "Robust data envelopment analysis with variable budgeted uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 626-641.
    3. Amin Mahmoudi & Mehdi Abbasi & Xiaopeng Deng, 2022. "Evaluating the Performance of the Suppliers Using Hybrid DEA-OPA Model: A Sustainable Development Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 335-362, April.
    4. Dariush Khezrimotlagh & Shaharuddin Salleh & Zahra Mohsenpour, 2014. "A new method for evaluating decision making units in DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(5), pages 694-707, May.
    5. Yu, Yang & Jian, Xin & Wang, Hongxiang & Jahanger, Atif & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel, 2024. "Unraveling the nexus: China's economic policy uncertainty and carbon emission efficiency through advanced multivariate quantile-on-quantile regression analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Cui, Lixin & Dong, Ruxue & Mu, Yunguo & Shen, Zhiyang & Xu, Jiatong, 2022. "How policy preferences affect the carbon shadow price in the OECD," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    7. Mahmoudi, Amin & Sadeghi, Mahsa & Deng, Xiaopeng & Mardani, Abbas, 2024. "A sustainable approach for exploiting cross-border nonrenewable resources using hybrid Game Theory and Ordinal Priority Approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Sang, Meiyue & Shen, Liyin, 2024. "An international perspective on carbon peaking status between a sample of 154 countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    9. Xiaohong Jiang & Jianxiao Ma & Huizhe Zhu & Xiucheng Guo & Zhaoguo Huang, 2020. "Evaluating the Carbon Emissions Efficiency of the Logistics Industry Based on a Super-SBM Model and the Malmquist Index from a Strong Transportation Strategy Perspective in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Meng, Conghui & Du, Xiaoyun & Zhu, Mengcheng & Ren, Yitian & Fang, Kai, 2023. "The static and dynamic carbon emission efficiency of transport industry in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    11. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Weber, William L., 2009. "A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 274-287, December.
    12. Arabmaldar, A. & Hatami-Marbini, A. & Loske, D. & Hammerschmidt, M. & Klumpp, M., 2024. "Robust data envelopment analysis with variable budgeted uncertainty," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 144495, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    13. Färe, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna, 2010. "Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 320-322, January.
    14. Wang, Qiang & Zhang, Chen & Li, Rongrong, 2022. "Towards carbon neutrality by improving carbon efficiency - A system-GMM dynamic panel analysis for 131 countries’ carbon efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    15. Napolitano, Oreste & Foresti, Pasquale & Kounetas, Konstantinos & Spagnolo, Nicola, 2023. "The impact of energy, renewable and CO2 emissions efficiency on countries’ productivity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    16. Shaojian Qu & Yuting Xu & Ying Ji & Can Feng & Jinpeng Wei & Shan Jiang, 2022. "Data-Driven Robust Data Envelopment Analysis for Evaluating the Carbon Emissions Efficiency of Provinces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    17. Papaioannou, Grammatoula & Podinovski, Victor V., 2024. "A single-stage optimization procedure for data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 1119-1128.
    18. Tian, Zhiguang & Mu, Xianzhong, 2024. "Towards China's dual-carbon target: Energy efficiency analysis of cities in the Yellow River Basin based on a “geography and high-quality development” heterogeneity framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D’Inverno, Giovanna & Carosi, Laura & Romano, Giulia & Guerrini, Andrea, 2018. "Water pollution in wastewater treatment plants: An efficiency analysis with undesirable output," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 24-34.
    2. Ruijing Zheng & Yu Cheng & Haimeng Liu & Wei Chen & Xiaodong Chen & Yaping Wang, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Distribution and Drivers of Urban Carbon Emission Efficiency: The Role of Technological Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Lingcai Liu & Dongbei Bai & Shah Fahad & Ilhan Ozturk, 2024. "Does diversified environmental regulation effect the foreign direct investment inflows and technological innovation? A three‐stage least square approach," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), June.
    4. Gómez-Calvet, Roberto & Conesa, David & Gómez-Calvet, Ana Rosa & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2014. "Energy efficiency in the European Union: What can be learned from the joint application of directional distance functions and slacks-based measures?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 137-154.
    5. Hang, Ye & Sun, Jiasen & Wang, Qunwei & Zhao, Zengyao & Wang, Yizhong, 2015. "Measuring energy inefficiency with undesirable outputs and technology heterogeneity in Chinese cities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 46-52.
    6. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Wang, H., 2012. "Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 625-635.
    7. Bo Li & Jing Liu & Qian Liu & Muhammad Mohiuddin, 2022. "The Effects of Broadband Infrastructure on Carbon Emission Efficiency of Resource-Based Cities in China: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from the “Broadband China” Pilot Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Sun, Jiasen & Yuan, Yang & Yang, Rui & Ji, Xiang & Wu, Jie, 2017. "Performance evaluation of Chinese port enterprises under significant environmental concerns: An extended DEA-based analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 75-86.
    9. Zhang, Bin & Lu, Danting & He, Yan & Chiu, Yung-ho, 2018. "The efficiencies of resource-saving and environment: A case study based on Chinese cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 493-507.
    10. Kounetas, Konstantinos & Zervopoulos, Panagiotis D., 2019. "A cross-country evaluation of environmental performance: Is there a convergence-divergence pattern in technology gaps?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1136-1148.
    11. Chen, Po-Chi & Yu, Ming-Miin & Chang, Ching-Cheng & Hsu, Shih-Hsun & Managi, Shunsuke, 2015. "The enhanced Russell-based directional distance measure with undesirable outputs: Numerical example considering CO2 emissions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 30-40.
    12. Qianru Chen & Hualin Xie, 2019. "Temporal-Spatial Differentiation and Optimization Analysis of Cultivated Land Green Utilization Efficiency in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Färe, Rolf & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Grosskopf, Shawna & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2015. "Decomposing profit efficiency using a slack-based directional distance function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 335-337.
    14. Adler, Nicole & Volta, Nicola, 2016. "Accounting for externalities and disposability: A directional economic environmental distance function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 314-327.
    15. Magdalena Kapelko, 2018. "Measuring inefficiency for specific inputs using data envelopment analysis: evidence from construction industry in Spain and Portugal," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(1), pages 43-66, March.
    16. Lin, Boqiang & Bai, Rui, 2020. "Dynamic energy performance evaluation of Chinese textile industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    17. Zhang, Ning & Kong, Fanbin & Choi, Yongrok, 2014. "Measuring sustainability performance for China: A sequential generalized directional distance function approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 392-397.
    18. Fujii, Hidemichi & Managi, Shunsuke & Matousek, Roman, 2014. "Indian bank efficiency and productivity changes with undesirable outputs: A disaggregated approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 41-50.
    19. Ke Wang & Yujiao Xian & Chia-Yen Lee & Yi-Ming Wei & Zhimin Huang, 2019. "On selecting directions for directional distance functions in a non-parametric framework: a review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 43-76, July.
    20. Färe, Rolf & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Grosskopf, Shawna & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2016. "Cost decompositions and the efficient subset," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 123-130.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2408.11600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.