IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03257-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In quest of perceived transaction cost’s impact on fintech users’ intention: the moderating role of situational factors

Author

Listed:
  • Haifeng Zhao

    (Tongji University)

  • Nosherwan Khaliq

    (Tongji University)

  • Chunling Li

    (Yanshan University)

  • Judit Oláh

    (University of Debrecen
    Czech University of Life Sciences
    WSB University)

Abstract

Studies show that Pakistan has made significant advancements in financial technology. However, the costs that prevent a client from using fintech are still unclear. This study aims to analyze the perceived transaction cost-related factors that affect their intention to fintech while having the moderating effects of situational factors. The data collected from an online questionnaire was used to test a structural equation model with Smart PLS 3 analysis. The survey included a two-part form with five-point Likert scales, receiving 276 replies from diverse backgrounds during a three-month online survey. This paper, which is based on Transaction Cost Economics, Innovation Diffusion Theory, and Belk’s Theory, hypothesizes that five antecedents influence consumers’ perceived transaction cost (PTC) of fintech, including dependability (β = −0.223), uncertainty (β = 0.204), asset specificity (β = 0.203), convenience (β = −0.186), complexity (β = 0.181). The intention of consumers to use fintech for online shopping or service utilization is negatively correlated with PTC. When acting as a moderator, situational factors such as the pandemic and impending police, and environmental and physical surroundings are found to be necessary. Customers have difficulty connecting specific reasons for not utilizing fintech to financial concerns. A negative association exists between perceived transaction cost and intention to use fintech. It is discovered that environmental and physical surroundings entirely counteract perceived transaction costs’ detrimental effects on intention to use.

Suggested Citation

  • Haifeng Zhao & Nosherwan Khaliq & Chunling Li & Judit Oláh, 2024. "In quest of perceived transaction cost’s impact on fintech users’ intention: the moderating role of situational factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03257-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03257-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03257-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03257-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ka-Man Leung & Kai-Ling Ou & Pak-Kwong Chung & Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani, 2021. "Older Adults’ Perceptions toward Walking: A Qualitative Study Using a Social-Ecological Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Williamson, Oliver E, 1979. "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 233-261, October.
    3. Li, Chia-Ying & Fang, Yu-Hui, 2022. "The more we get together, the more we can save? A transaction cost perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. Eleanor Singer & Cong Ye, 2013. "The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 645(1), pages 112-141, January.
    5. Hyun-Sun Ryu & Kwang Sun Ko, 2020. "Sustainable Development of Fintech: Focused on Uncertainty and Perceived Quality Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Hussein Ahmed Alshari & M. A. Lokhande, 2022. "The impact of demographic factors of clients’ attitudes and their intentions to use FinTech services on the banking sector in the least developed countries," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2114305-211, December.
    7. Wenxiang Zhang & Saeed Siyal & Samina Riaz & Riaz Ahmad & Mohd Faiz Hilmi & Zhi Li, 2023. "Data Security, Customer Trust and Intention for Adoption of Fintech Services: An Empirical Analysis From Commercial Bank Users in Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    8. Atchara Leerapong, 2013. "Applying Diffusion of Innovation in Online Purchase Intention through Social Network: A Focus Group Study of Facebook in Thailand," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 5(3), pages 144-154.
    9. Branstad, Are & Solem, Birgit A., 2020. "Emerging theories of consumer-driven market innovation, adoption, and diffusion: A selective review of consumer-oriented studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 561-571.
    10. Rangaswamy, Arvind & Moch, Nicole & Felten, Claudio & van Bruggen, Gerrit & Wieringa, Jaap E. & Wirtz, Jochen, 2020. "The Role of Marketing in Digital Business Platforms," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 72-90.
    11. Wan-Rung Lin & Yi-Hsien Wang & Yi-Min Hung, 2020. "Analyzing the factors influencing adoption intention of internet banking: Applying DEMATEL-ANP-SEM approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Eastlick, Mary Ann & Feinberg, Richard A., 1999. "Shopping Motives for Mail Catalog Shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 281-290, July.
    13. You-Kyung Lee, 2021. "Impacts of Digital Technostress and Digital Technology Self-Efficacy on Fintech Usage Intention of Chinese Gen Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Daniel Levis & Francesco Fontana & Elisa Ughetto, 2021. "A look into the future of blockchain technology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Belk, Russell W, 1975. "Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(3), pages 157-164, December.
    16. Dekar Urumsah & Rintan Falah Ispridevi & Aris Nurherwening & Wirawan Hardinto, 2022. "Fintech adoption: Its determinants and organizational benefits in Indonesia," Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 26(1), pages 88-101.
    17. Wang, Lei & Jiang, Fuming & Li, Jun & Motohashi, Kazuyuki & Zheng, Xiaosong, 2019. "The contingent effects of asset specificity, contract specificity, and trust on offshore relationship performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 338-349.
    18. John, George & Weitz, Barton A, 1988. "Forward Integration into Distribution: An Empirical Test of Transaction Cost Analysis," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 337-355, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bianca Polenzani & Andrea Marchini, 2022. "Does the Covid-19 affect food consumption patterns? A Transaction Cost Perspective," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 24(2), pages 1-28.
    2. Ji, Chen & de Felipe, Isabel & Briz, Julian & Trienekens, Jacques H., 2012. "An Empirical Study on Governance Structure Choices in China´s Pork Supply Chain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, May.
    3. Pavez, Iciar & Codron, Jean-Marie & Lubello, Pasquale & Florêncio, Maria Cecilia, 2019. "Biosecurity institutions and the choice of contracts in international fruit supply chains," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Fernández Olmos, Marta, 2010. "The performance implications of "grow or buy" decisions in the wine industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 256-264, June.
    5. Dongli Zhang, 2013. "The Revival of Vertical Integration: Strategic Choice and Performance Influences," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, February.
    6. R B McNaughton, 1999. "Transaction Cost Analysis and the Methodology of Foreign-Market Entry-Mode Studies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(4), pages 575-596, April.
    7. Francine Lafontaine & Margaret Slade, 2007. "Vertical Integration and Firm Boundaries: The Evidence," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 45(3), pages 629-685, September.
    8. Davide Vannoni, 1999. "Empirical Studies of Vertical Integration: the Transaction Cost Orthodoxy," CERIS Working Paper 199903, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    9. Jordi Perdiguero, 2011. "Vertical relations and local competition: an empirical approach," IREA Working Papers 201124, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Dec 2011.
    10. Zsófia Benedek & Imre Fertő & Adrienn Molnár, 2018. "Off to market: but which one? Understanding the participation of small-scale farmers in short food supply chains—a Hungarian case study," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(2), pages 383-398, June.
    11. QUELIN, Bertrand & BARTHELEMY, Jerome, 2002. "Competence, specificity and outsourcing: impact on the complexity of the contract," HEC Research Papers Series 759, HEC Paris.
    12. Yubin Yang & Seungyoup Choo & Seong-Joon Limb, 2023. "Vertical Integration Strategies and Environmental Uncertainty: China’s Film Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    13. Birger Wernerfelt & Alvin Silk & Shuyi Yu, 2021. "Internalization of Advertising Services: Testing a Theory of the Firm," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 946-963, September.
    14. Gërdoçi, Blendi & Skreli, Engjell & Imami, Drini, 2016. "Determinants of Sustainable Relationships in the Albanian Apple Production Sector," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Lajili, Kaouthar & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2005. "Revisiting Agency and Transaction Costs Theory Predictions on Vertical Financial Ownership and Contracting: Electronic Integration as an Organizational Form Choice," Working Papers 05-0106, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    16. Mahoney, Joseph T. & McNally, Regina C., 2004. "Explaining and Predicting the Choice of Organizational Form: Integrating Performance Ambiguity and Asset Specificity Effects," Working Papers 04-0109, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    17. Fan, Joseph P. H., 2000. "Price uncertainty and vertical integration: an examination of petrochemical firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 345-376, December.
    18. Hao, Jinghui & Bijman, Jos & Gardebroek, Cornelis & Heerink, Nico & Heijman, Wim & Huo, Xuexi, 2018. "Cooperative membership and farmers’ choice of marketing channels – Evidence from apple farmers in Shaanxi and Shandong Provinces, China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-64.
    19. John, George & Reve, Torger, 2010. "Transaction Cost Analysis in Marketing: Looking Back, Moving Forward," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 248-256.
    20. Regan, Laureen & Tennyson, Sharon, 1996. "Agent Discretion and the Choice of Insurance Marketing System," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(2), pages 637-666, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03257-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.