IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-02976-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of perceived ease of use, usefulness, and financial strength on the adoption of health information systems: the moderating role of hospital size

Author

Listed:
  • Ji Luo

    (Shanghai Polytechnic University)

  • Sayed Fayaz Ahmad

    (Institute of Business Management)

  • Asma Alyaemeni

    (King Saud University)

  • Yuhan Ou

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Muhammad Irshad

    (University of Gwadar)

  • Randah Alyafi-Alzahri

    (King Saud University)

  • Ghadeer Alsanie

    (King Saud University)

  • Syeda Taj Unnisa

    (King Saud University)

Abstract

Adoption of a health information system is always a challenge for hospitals. It is because most of the medical staff do not have enough skills to use the new technology and due to the sensitivity of medical data. These factors pose a challenge for the successful adoption of health information system in hospitals. The aim of this research is to find out the factors which influence the adoption of information systems in hospitals. The study investigated the impact of the Financial status of the Hospital; Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use on the adoption of health information systems through a questionnaire survey. Data was collected from 602 healthcare workers from 20 hospitals through close-ended questionnaire in Pakistan, where the adoption of health information systems is very slow. PLS-SEM was used for the analysis. The findings show that the Financial status of the Hospital; Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use have positive and significant role in the adoption of Health Information Systems. The finding also shows that hospital size moderates the relationship of Perceived ease of use and the adoption of health information systems and interestingly it does not moderate the relationship among perceived usefulness and financial strength toward the adoption of health information systems. The study concludes that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and financial strength are the main factors, necessary for the adoption of health information systems. The findings of the study have useful implications for policy makers, medical professionals to successfully adopt health information systems in hospitals. It also provides new avenues for researchers to explore other factors and test this framework in other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji Luo & Sayed Fayaz Ahmad & Asma Alyaemeni & Yuhan Ou & Muhammad Irshad & Randah Alyafi-Alzahri & Ghadeer Alsanie & Syeda Taj Unnisa, 2024. "Role of perceived ease of use, usefulness, and financial strength on the adoption of health information systems: the moderating role of hospital size," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-02976-9
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-02976-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-02976-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-02976-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sayed Fayaz Ahmad & Mohd. Khairil Rahmat & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik & Muhammad Mansoor Alam & Syed Irfan Hyder, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Chen, Peng-Ting & Lin, Chia-Li & Wu, Wan-Ning, 2020. "Big data management in healthcare: Adoption challenges and implications," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    3. Michael Addotey-Delove & Richard E. Scott & Maurice Mars, 2023. "Healthcare Workers’ Perspectives of mHealth Adoption Factors in the Developing World: Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Saeed Mousa & Taoufik Bouraoui, 2023. "The Role of Sustainability and Innovation in Financial Services Business Transformation," Post-Print hal-03997020, HAL.
    5. Omar Hasan Salah & Zawiyah Mohammad Yusof & Hazura Mohamed, 2021. "The determinant factors for the adoption of CRM in the Palestinian SMEs: The moderating effect of firm size," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Robert D. Dewar & Jane E. Dutton, 1986. "The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(11), pages 1422-1433, November.
    7. Mohammad Alboliteeh & Maha Sanat Alrashidi & Nojoud Alrashedi & Analita Gonzales & Romeo Jr Mostoles & Eddieson Pasay-an & Wireen Leila Dator, 2022. "Knowledge Management and Sustainability Performance of Hospital Organisations: The Healthcare Managers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Mazhar Abbas & Muhammad Shahid Nawaz & Jamil Ahmad & Muhammad Ashraf, 2017. "The effect of innovation and consumer related factors on consumer resistance to innovation," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1312058-131, January.
    9. Kraus, Sascha & Schiavone, Francesco & Pluzhnikova, Anna & Invernizzi, Anna Chiara, 2021. "Digital transformation in healthcare: Analyzing the current state-of-research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 557-567.
    10. Dicuonzo, Grazia & Donofrio, Francesca & Fusco, Antonio & Shini, Matilda, 2023. "Healthcare system: Moving forward with artificial intelligence," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Sayed Fayaz Ahmad & Muhammad Mansoor Alam & Mohd. Khairil Rahmat & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik & Syed Irfan Hyder, 2022. "Academic and Administrative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-11, January.
    12. Vernon Loke & Laura Choi & Margaret Libby, 2015. "Increasing Youth Financial Capability: An Evaluation of the MyPath Savings Initiative," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 97-126, March.
    13. Adi Alsyouf & Abdalwali Lutfi & Nizar Alsubahi & Fahad Nasser Alhazmi & Khalid Al-Mugheed & Rami J. Anshasi & Nora Ibrahim Alharbi & Moteb Albugami, 2023. "The Use of a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict Patients’ Usage of a Personal Health Record System: The Role of Security, Privacy, and Usability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Basile, L.J. & Carbonara, N. & Panniello, U. & Pellegrino, R., 2024. "The role of big data analytics in improving the quality of healthcare services in the Italian context: The mediating role of risk management," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Raimo, Nicola & De Turi, Ivano & Albergo, Francesco & Vitolla, Filippo, 2023. "The drivers of the digital transformation in the healthcare industry: An empirical analysis in Italian hospitals," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    3. Sayed Fayaz Ahmad & Muhammad Mansoor Alam & Mohd. Khairil Rahmat & Muhammad Khalil Shahid & Mahnaz Aslam & Nur Agus Salim & Mohammed Hasan Ali Al-Abyadh, 2023. "Leading Edge or Bleeding Edge: Designing a Framework for the Adoption of AI Technology in an Educational Organization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Davood Askarany & Malcolm Smith, 2008. "Diffusion of innovation and business size: a longitudinal study of PACIA," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(9), pages 900-916, October.
    5. Li, Xu & Vermeulen, Freek, 2021. "High risk, low return (and vice versa): the effect of product innovation on firm performance in a transition economy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120268, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Yuen, Kum Fai & Chua, Jie Ying & Li, Xue & Wang, Xueqin, 2023. "The determinants of users’ intention to adopt telehealth: Health belief, perceived value and self-determination perspectives," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Verhoeven, Dennis & Bakker, Jurriën & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2016. "Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 707-723.
    8. Goisser, Simon & Mempel, Heike & Bitsch, Vera, 2020. "Food-Scanners as a Radical Innovation in German Fresh Produce Supply Chains," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 11(02), April.
    9. Tsui-Yii Shih, 2018. "Determinants of Enterprises Radical Innovation and Performance: Insights into Strategic Orientation of Cultural and Creative Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Zheng, Leven J. & Fan, Youqing & Wang, Huan & Liu, Wei, 2021. "Born innovator? How founder birth order influences product innovation generation and adoption in entrepreneurial firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 414-430.
    11. Maxim Kotsemir & Alexander Abroskin & Dirk Meissner, 2013. "Innovation concepts and typology – an evolutionary discussion," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    12. Zahoor, Nadia & Zopiatis, Anastasios & Adomako, Samuel & Lamprinakos, Grigorios, 2023. "The micro-foundations of digitally transforming SMEs: How digital literacy and technology interact with managerial attributes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Wang Dongling & Kelvin C.K. Lam, 2018. "Whether the Innovation Policy Will Really Improve Enterprise’s Innovation Performance— Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Learning," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 96-107, September.
    14. Saiful Azam, 2014. "Perceived Environmental Factors And The Intention To Adopt A Standard Business Reporting Facility: A Survey Of Australian Corporate Cfos," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 10(2), pages 147-173.
    15. Scaringella, Laurent & Burtschell, François, 2017. "The challenges of radical innovation in Iran: Knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity highlights — Evidence from a joint venture in the construction sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 151-169.
    16. Ma Asunción Esteso-Blasco & María Gil-Marqués & Juan Sapena, 2021. "Leadership in Economy of Communion Companies. Contribution to the Common Good through Innovation," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 77-101, April.
    17. Sanghyun Kim & Bora Kim & Minsoo Seo, 2020. "Impacts of Sustainable Information Technology Capabilities on Information Security Assimilation: The Moderating Effects of Policy—Technology Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Gosselin, Maurice, 1997. "The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 105-122, February.
    19. Andrei, Mariana & Rohdin, Patrik & Thollander, Patrik & Wallin, Johanna & Tångring, Magnus, 2024. "Exploring a decarbonization framework for a Swedish automotive paint shop," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    20. Garcia-Perez, Alexeis & Cegarra-Navarro, Juan Gabriel & Sallos, Mark Paul & Martinez-Caro, Eva & Chinnaswamy, Anitha, 2023. "Resilience in healthcare systems: Cyber security and digital transformation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-02976-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.