IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/usm/journl/aamjaf01002_147-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Environmental Factors And The Intention To Adopt A Standard Business Reporting Facility: A Survey Of Australian Corporate Cfos

Author

Listed:
  • Saiful Azam

    (School of Accounting, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476 Melbourne, 3001, Australia)

Abstract

The Australian government's extensible business reporting language (XBRL)-derived reporting facility, called Standard Business Reporting (SBR), went 'live' to companies in 2010. Its voluntary take-up by companies has been poor following a promotion that emphasised its technological benefits. This study seeks to identify a set of perceived environmental factors and examine how these factors influence managerial intention to adopt SBR. A survey instrument is developed to measure the extent of the competitive pressure, government pressure and external communication perceived by the Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) of listed companies as influences on their firms' intention to adopt SBR. Based on 54 usable responses by CFOs of relatively large listed companies, the survey results reveal that, contrary to the expectation, no significant association exists between perceived competitiveness in the industry and the intention to adopt SBR. However, CFOs regard becoming a leader or an early follower as a significant consideration influencing their firms' intentions to adopt SBR. As the paper reports, CFOs believe that they do not have adequate information about SBR from external sources. Communication about SBR is found to be significantly related to the intention to adopt SBR. Interestingly, government pressure is not found to relate to the intention to adopt SBR. Implications of these environmental influences for the successful voluntary take-up of SBR in Australia are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Saiful Azam, 2014. "Perceived Environmental Factors And The Intention To Adopt A Standard Business Reporting Facility: A Survey Of Australian Corporate Cfos," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 10(2), pages 147-173.
    • Handle: RePEc:usm:journl:aamjaf01002_147-173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://web.usm.my/journal/aamjaf/vol%2010-2-2014/AAMJAF%2010-2-7%20%28147-173%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sree Nilakanta & Richard W. Scamell, 1990. "The Effect of Information Sources and Communication Channels on the diffusion of Innovation in a Data Base Development Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 24-40, January.
    2. Dong, Yan & Xu, Kefeng & Dresner, Martin, 2007. "Environmental determinants of VMI adoption: An exploratory analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 355-369, July.
    3. Elsayed, Mohamed Omran & Hoque, Zahirul, 2010. "Perceived international environmental factors and corporate voluntary disclosure practices: An empirical study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 17-35.
    4. Debreceny, Roger & Farewell, Stephanie & Piechocki, Maciej & Felden, Carsten & Gräning, André, 2010. "Does it add up? Early evidence on the data quality of XBRL filings to the SEC," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 296-306, June.
    5. Paul Chwelos & Izak Benbasat & Albert S. Dexter, 2001. "Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 304-321, September.
    6. Lopes, Patricia Teixeira & Rodrigues, Lucia Lima, 2007. "Accounting for financial instruments: An analysis of the determinants of disclosure in the Portuguese stock exchange," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 25-56.
    7. Ahmed Riahi-Belkaoui & Fouad K. AlNajjar, 2006. "Earnings opacity internationally and elements of social, economic and accounting order," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 189-203, May.
    8. Robert D. Dewar & Jane E. Dutton, 1986. "The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(11), pages 1422-1433, November.
    9. Thomas, Andrew P., 1986. "The contingency theory of corporate reporting: Some empirical evidence," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 253-270, May.
    10. Roger Debreceny & Glen Gray, 1999. "Financial reporting on the Internet and the external audit," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 335-350.
    11. Tarun Khanna & Krishna G. Palepu & Suraj Srinivasan, 2004. "Disclosure Practices of Foreign Companies Interacting with U.S. Markets," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 475-508, May.
    12. Armitage, Seth & Marston, Claire, 2008. "Corporate disclosure, cost of capital and reputation: Evidence from finance directors," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 314-336.
    13. Kulviwat, Songpol & Bruner II, Gordon C. & Al-Shuridah, Obaid, 2009. "The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 706-712, July.
    14. R.M. Haniffa & T. E. Cooke, 2002. "Culture, Corporate Governance and Disclosure in Malaysian Corporations," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 38(3), pages 317-349, October.
    15. Joanne Locke & Alan Lowe, 2007. "XBRL: An (Open) Source of Enlightenment or Disillusion?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 585-623.
    16. Yoon, Hyungwook & Zo, Hangjung & Ciganek, Andrew P., 2011. "Does XBRL adoption reduce information asymmetry?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 157-163, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alrowwad, Anas Mohammad & Alhasanat, Khaled Ahmad & Sokil, Oleh & Halko, Serhii & Kucherkova, Svitlana, 2022. "Sustainable transformation of accounting in agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(2), June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elsayed, Mohamed Omran & Hoque, Zahirul, 2010. "Perceived international environmental factors and corporate voluntary disclosure practices: An empirical study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 17-35.
    2. Henderson, Dave & Sheetz, Steven D. & Trinkle, Brad S., 2012. "The determinants of inter-organizational and internal in-house adoption of XBRL: A structural equation model," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 109-140.
    3. Diego Valentinetti & Michele A. Rea, 2013. "XBRL for Financial Reporting: Evidence on Italian GAAP versus IFRS," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 237-259, September.
    4. Hichem Khlif & Kamran Ahmed & Mohsen Souissi, 2017. "Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure: A synthesis of empirical studies," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 42(3), pages 376-403, August.
    5. Indrit Troshani & Nick Rowbottom, 2021. "Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 213-232, September.
    6. André Gräning & Carsten Felden & Maciej Piechocki, 2011. "Status Quo and Potential of XBRL for Business and Information Systems Engineering," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(4), pages 231-239, August.
    7. Vera Lucia M. Cunha & M. Dinis Mendes, 2017. "Financial Determinants of Corporate Governance Disclosure: Portuguese Evidence," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 3(1), pages 21-36, January.
    8. Mitzi Cubilla‐Montilla & Ana‐Belén Nieto‐Librero & Ma Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ma Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel‐María Garcia‐Sanchez, 2019. "Are cultural values sufficient to improve stakeholder engagement human and labour rights issues?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 938-955, July.
    9. Jonas Oliveira & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues & Russell Craig, 2011. "Risk-related disclosures by non-finance companies: Portuguese practices and disclosure characteristics," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(9), pages 817-839, October.
    10. Kirti Aggarwal, 2023. "Corporate governance and HR disclosure practices: evidence from India," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Khandelwal, Chandni & Kumar, Satish & Madhavan, Vinodh & Pandey, Nitesh, 2020. "Do board characteristics impact corporate risk disclosures? The Indian experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 103-111.
    12. Yanqi Sun & Pui San Ip & Michael Jones & Jenny Jing Wang & Yi An, 2021. "Determinants of Animal Welfare Disclosure Practices: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Abdallah, Abed Al-Nasser & Hassan, Mostafa Kamal & McClelland, Patrick L., 2015. "Islamic financial institutions, corporate governance, and corporate risk disclosure in Gulf Cooperation Council countries," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 63-82.
    14. Ripon Kumar Dey & Syed Zabid Hossain & Zabihollah Rezaee, 2018. "Financial Risk Disclosure and Financial Attributes among Publicly Traded Manufacturing Companies: Evidence from Bangladesh," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Silvia Gardini & F. Marta L. Di Lascio & Franco Visani, 2017. "Opportunism in disclosing pro-forma indicators: rationale and contextual drivers," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS42, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    16. Jap Efendi & Jin Dong Park & Chandra Subramaniam, 2016. "Does the XBRL Reporting Format Provide Incremental Information Value? A Study Using XBRL Disclosures During the Voluntary Filing Program," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(2), pages 259-285, June.
    17. Gisbert, Ana & Navallas, Begoña, 2013. "The association between voluntary disclosure and corporate governance in the presence of severe agency conflicts," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 286-298.
    18. Pavlopoulos, Athanasios & Magnis, Chris & Iatridis, George Emmanuel, 2017. "Integrated reporting: Is it the last piece of the accounting disclosure puzzle?," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 23-46.
    19. Rihab Grassa & Nejia Moumen & Khaled Hussainey, 2021. "What drives risk disclosure in Islamic and conventional banks? An international comparison," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 6338-6361, October.
    20. Kelly Anh Vu & Greg Tower & Glennda Scully, 2011. "Corporate communication for Vietnamese listed firms," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 125-146, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:usm:journl:aamjaf01002_147-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Division, Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aammmea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.