IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jmarka/v12y2024i4d10.1057_s41270-023-00254-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A gateway toward truly responsive customers: using the uplift modeling to increase the performance of a B2B marketing campaign

Author

Listed:
  • Meltem Sanisoglu

    (Istanbul Technical University
    Istanbul Technical University)

  • Sebnem Burnaz

    (Istanbul Technical University)

  • Tolga Kaya

    (Istanbul Technical University)

Abstract

It is evident that companies invest considerable resources in creating and implementing marketing initiatives mainly to attract customers and thereby increase their market presence. Determining if these marketing efforts are effective in convincing customers to take desired actions is challenging since companies need to ensure that their marketing campaigns are feasible in order to target the right customers who are most likely to respond to the marketing treatment. Prescriptive analytics provide better means to measure the impact of a marketing campaign on customer behavior when compared to conventional predictive analytics. Uplift modeling presents an opportunity to maximize the incremental impact of marketing treatment by determining the most responsive customer segment who will take positive action only because of receiving the treatment. This paper aims to suggest an uplift modeling approach in a marketing campaign in B2B context for better evaluation of performance which has not gained enough attention as B2C in literature. By applying three uplift modeling techniques to a real-world B2B cross-sell campaign, it is demonstrated that the campaign effectiveness can be increased significantly by determining the customers who are truly responsive to the related campaign.

Suggested Citation

  • Meltem Sanisoglu & Sebnem Burnaz & Tolga Kaya, 2024. "A gateway toward truly responsive customers: using the uplift modeling to increase the performance of a B2B marketing campaign," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 909-924, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jmarka:v:12:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1057_s41270-023-00254-2
    DOI: 10.1057/s41270-023-00254-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41270-023-00254-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41270-023-00254-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georgios Marinakos & Sophia Daskalaki, 2017. "Imbalanced customer classification for bank direct marketing," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 14-30, March.
    2. Stefan Wager & Susan Athey, 2018. "Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(523), pages 1228-1242, July.
    3. Friederike Paetz & Winfried J. Steiner & Harald Hruschka, 2022. "Correction to: Advanced data analysis techniques with marketing applications," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(4), pages 563-564, May.
    4. Friederike Paetz & Winfried J. Steiner & Harald Hruschka, 2022. "“Advanced data analysis techniques with marketing applications”," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(4), pages 557-561, May.
    5. Jinping Hu, 2023. "Customer feature selection from high-dimensional bank direct marketing data for uplift modeling," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(2), pages 160-171, June.
    6. Arno de Caigny & Kristof Coussement & Wouter Verbeke & Khaoula Idbenjra & Minh Phan, 2021. "Uplift modeling and its implications for B2B customer churn prediction: A segmentation-based modeling approach," Post-Print hal-03599615, HAL.
    7. Eugenia Y. Huang & Chia-jung Tsui, 2016. "Assessing customer retention in B2C electronic commerce: an empirical study," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(4), pages 172-185, December.
    8. Daniel Baier & Björn Stöcker, 2022. "Profit uplift modeling for direct marketing campaigns: approaches and applications for online shops," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(4), pages 645-673, May.
    9. Maria Petrescu & Anjala S. Krishen, 2023. "A decade of marketing analytics and more to come: JMA insights," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(2), pages 117-129, June.
    10. Bose, Indranil & Chen, Xi, 2009. "Quantitative models for direct marketing: A review from systems perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bokelmann, Björn & Lessmann, Stefan, 2024. "Improving uplift model evaluation on randomized controlled trial data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 691-707.
    2. Wolfgang Breuer & Jannis Bischof & Christian Hofmann & Jochen Hundsdoerfer & Hans-Ulrich Küpper & Marko Sarstedt & Philipp Schreck & Tim Weitzel & Peter Witt, 2023. "Recent developments in Business Economics," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 989-1013, August.
    3. Lechner, Michael, 2018. "Modified Causal Forests for Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 12040, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. William Arbour, 2021. "Can Recidivism be Prevented from Behind Bars? Evidence from a Behavioral Program," Working Papers tecipa-683, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    5. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Christian Hansen & Kengo Kato, 2018. "High-dimensional econometrics and regularized GMM," CeMMAP working papers CWP35/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Dimitris Bertsimas & Agni Orfanoudaki & Rory B. Weiner, 2020. "Personalized treatment for coronary artery disease patients: a machine learning approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 482-506, December.
    7. Nicolaj N. Mühlbach, 2020. "Tree-based Synthetic Control Methods: Consequences of moving the US Embassy," CREATES Research Papers 2020-04, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    8. Kyle Colangelo & Ying-Ying Lee, 2019. "Double debiased machine learning nonparametric inference with continuous treatments," CeMMAP working papers CWP72/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    9. Shonosuke Sugasawa & Hisashi Noma, 2021. "Efficient screening of predictive biomarkers for individual treatment selection," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 249-257, March.
    10. Ruoxuan Xiong & Allison Koenecke & Michael Powell & Zhu Shen & Joshua T. Vogelstein & Susan Athey, 2021. "Federated Causal Inference in Heterogeneous Observational Data," Papers 2107.11732, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    11. Arne Henningsen & Guy Low & David Wuepper & Tobias Dalhaus & Hugo Storm & Dagim Belay & Stefan Hirsch, 2024. "Estimating Causal Effects with Observational Data: Guidelines for Agricultural and Applied Economists," IFRO Working Paper 2024/03, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    12. Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Keola, Souknilanh & Silaphet, Korrakoun & Yamanouchi, Kenta, 2022. "Estimating the impacts of international bridges on foreign firm locations: a machine learning approach," IDE Discussion Papers 847, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    13. Davide Viviano & Jelena Bradic, 2019. "Synthetic learner: model-free inference on treatments over time," Papers 1904.01490, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    14. Naguib, Costanza, 2019. "Estimating the Heterogeneous Impact of the Free Movement of Persons on Relative Wage Mobility," Economics Working Paper Series 1903, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    15. Labro, Eva & Lang, Mark & Omartian, James D., 2023. "Predictive analytics and centralization of authority," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    16. Rina Friedberg & Julie Tibshirani & Susan Athey & Stefan Wager, 2018. "Local Linear Forests," Papers 1807.11408, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    17. J. Michelle Brock & Ralph De Haas, 2023. "Discriminatory Lending: Evidence from Bankers in the Lab," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 31-68, April.
    18. Liangyuan Hu & Lihua Li, 2022. "Using Tree-Based Machine Learning for Health Studies: Literature Review and Case Series," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Frondel, Manuel & Kussel, Gerhard & Sommer, Stephan & Vance, Colin, 2019. "Local cost for global benefit: The case of wind turbines," Ruhr Economic Papers 791, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen, revised 2019.
    20. Xinkun Nie & Stefan Wager, 2017. "Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," Papers 1712.04912, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jmarka:v:12:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1057_s41270-023-00254-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.