IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v49y2022i3p409-429..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Almost Equal: Consumption under Fragmented Stigma
[“The Low Literate Consumer]

Author

Listed:
  • Christian A Eichert
  • Marius K Luedicke

Abstract

How do historically stigmatized social groups consume strategically when they have achieved greater recognition, status, and respectability in society? Based on a seven-year interpretive social representations analysis of gay men in Germany, the authors first show that dominant, stigmatizing representations of such groups do not ameliorate uniformly and for all. Instead, they fragment into oppressive, enabling, and normalized societal representations that different consumers encounter to different degrees in their everyday lives. In the wake of these societal shifts, the stigmatized group itself disintegrates into five representational subgroups, referred to as underground, discrete, hybrid, assimilated, and post-stigma social groups. These subgroups use consumption for different and partly opposing strategic purposes, such as hiding and denial, collective resistance, and deconstruction of differences. The authors synthesize their findings into a conceptual model of consumption under fragmented stigma that extends prior research on consumption under dominant and total stigma configurations and suggests ways in which consumption can not only mitigate but also reinforce stigma. In doing so, they also shed light on the complex lived experiences of a vulnerable social group that has become almost equal.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian A Eichert & Marius K Luedicke, 2022. "Almost Equal: Consumption under Fragmented Stigma [“The Low Literate Consumer]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(3), pages 409-429.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2022:i:3:p:409-429.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucab077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    2. David Crockett, 2017. "Paths to Respectability: Consumption and Stigma Management in the Contemporary Black Middle Class," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 554-581.
    3. Marcus Phipps & Julie L. Ozanne, 2017. "Routines Disrupted: Reestablishing Security through Practice Alignment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(2), pages 361-380.
    4. Marius K. Luedicke, 2015. "Indigenes’ Responses to Immigrants’ Consumer Acculturation: A Relational Configuration Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 42(1), pages 109-129.
    5. Marius K. Luedicke & Craig J. Thompson & Markus Giesler, 2010. "Consumer Identity Work as Moral Protagonism: How Myth and Ideology Animate a Brand-Mediated Moral Conflict," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(6), pages 1016-1032, April.
    6. Özlem Sandikci & Güliz Ger, 2010. "Veiling in Style: How Does a Stigmatized Practice Become Fashionable?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(1), pages 15-36, June.
    7. Firat, A Fuat & Venkatesh, Alladi, 1995. "Liberatory Postmodernism and the Reenchantment of Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(3), pages 239-267, December.
    8. Kates, Steven M, 2002. "The Protean Quality of Subcultural Consumption: An Ethnographic Account of Gay Consumers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(3), pages 383-399, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hartl, Barbara & Marth, Sarah & Hofmann, Eva & Penz, Elfriede, 2024. "‘One bad apple won’t spoil the bunch’ – Representations of the “sharing economy”," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Sandikci, Ozlem & Jafari, Aliakbar & Fischer, Eileen, 2024. "Claiming market ownership: Territorial activism in stigmatized markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Cait Lamberton & Tom Wein & Andrew Morningstar & Sakshi Ghai, 2024. "Marketing’s role in promoting dignity and human rights: A conceptualization for assessment and future research," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 1391-1411, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lydia Ottlewski, 2021. "Building and Strengthening Community at the Margins of Society through Social Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Nguyen, Hieu P. & Chen, Steven & Mukherjee, Sayantani, 2014. "Reverse stigma in the Freegan community," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1877-1884.
    3. Sandikci, Ozlem & Jafari, Aliakbar & Fischer, Eileen, 2024. "Claiming market ownership: Territorial activism in stigmatized markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Matthew Hawkins, 2019. "The effect of activity identity fusion on negative consumer behavior," Post-Print hal-02014635, HAL.
    5. Bernd Schmitt & J Joško Brakus & Alessandro Biraglia, 2022. "Consumption Ideology [Ideology and Terror: A Novel Form of Government]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(1), pages 74-95.
    6. Jenna Drenten & Robert L Harrison & Nicholas J Pendarvis, 2023. "More Gamer, Less Girl: Gendered Boundaries, Tokenism, and the Cultural Persistence of Masculine Dominance," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 50(1), pages 2-24.
    7. Akon E. Ekpo & Benét DeBerry-Spence & Geraldine Rosa Henderson & Joseph Cherian, 2018. "Narratives of technology consumption in the face of marketplace discrimination," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 451-463, December.
    8. Nicoletta Buratti & Francesco Derchi & Giorgia Profumo, 2015. "The blurred boundary between empowered and working consumers: insights from the winner taco case," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(4), pages 133-156.
    9. Sonya A Grier & David Crockett & Guillaume D Johnson & Kevin D Thomas & Tonya Williams Bradford, 2023. "Race In Consumer Research: Past, Present, And Future," Post-Print hal-04200003, HAL.
    10. Alice Audrezet & Béatrice Parguel, 2023. "Unpacking nontarget majority consumers' responses to modest fashion: How market controversy perpetuates marketplace exclusion," Post-Print lirmm-03912092, HAL.
    11. Biraghi, Silvia & Gambetti, Rossella & Pace, Stefano, 2018. "Between tribes and markets: The emergence of a liquid consumer-entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 392-402.
    12. Luigi Cantone & Pierpaolo Testa & Teresa Marrone, 2022. "Issues in defining and placing consumer brand engagement," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2022(2), pages 135-172, June.
    13. Ateeq A. Rauf & Ajnesh Prasad, 2020. "Temporal Spaces of Egalitarianism: The Ethical Negation of Economic Inequality in an Ephemeral Religious Organization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 699-718, March.
    14. Liu, Martin J. & Yannopoulou, Natalia & Bian, Xuemei & Elliott, Richard, 2015. "Authenticity Perceptions in the Chinese Marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 27-33.
    15. Delphine Godefroit-Winkel & Lisa Peñaloza, 2024. "The Ethics of Freedom in Consumption: An Ethnographic Account of the Social Dimensions of Supermarket Shopping for Moroccan Women," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 479-506, January.
    16. Lee, Michael S.W. & Motion, Judith & Conroy, Denise, 2009. "Anti-consumption and brand avoidance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 169-180, February.
    17. Marie-Catherine Husson Paquier & Sophie Morin-Delerm, 2017. "L'acheteur, un excellent storyteller : Le cas de l'acheteur de produits monastiques," Post-Print hal-03693982, HAL.
    18. Chaney, Damien & Goulding, Christina, 2016. "Dress, transformation, and conformity in the heavy rock subculture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 155-165.
    19. Zanette, Maria Carolina & Brito, Eliane Pereira Zamith & Fontenelle, Isleide Arruda & de Camargo Heck, Marina, 2021. "Eating one’s own otherness: When producers commercialize their ethnicities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 134-144.
    20. Skandalis, Alexandros & Byrom, John & Banister, Emma, 2019. "Experiential marketing and the changing nature of extraordinary experiences in post-postmodern consumer culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 43-50.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2022:i:3:p:409-429.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.