IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v43y2016i3p448-459..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Focusing on the Similarity of Substitutes Leaves a Lot to Be Desired

Author

Listed:
  • Zachary G. Arens
  • Rebecca W. Hamilton

Abstract

Consumers frequently choose substitutes for products that are out of stock, unavailable, too unhealthy, or too expensive. A series of studies shows that focusing on differences between the substitute and the unattained alternative reduces the consumer’s desire for the unattained alternative more than focusing on similarities between them. Whether consumers were dieting, listening to songs, or consuming snacks in the lab, focusing on differences reduced their desire for the unattained alternative—and subsequent consumption of this item after consuming the substitute—more than focusing on similarities. This suggests that consumers can reduce overconsumption by focusing on how the substitutes they consume differ from the alternatives they wish to avoid.

Suggested Citation

  • Zachary G. Arens & Rebecca W. Hamilton, 2016. "Why Focusing on the Similarity of Substitutes Leaves a Lot to Be Desired," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(3), pages 448-459.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:43:y:2016:i:3:p:448-459.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucw034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph P. Redden, 2008. "Reducing Satiation: The Role of Categorization Level," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(5), pages 624-634, August.
    2. Johnson, Michael D, 1988. "Comparability and Hierarchical Processing in Multialternative Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(3), pages 303-314, December.
    3. Inman, J Jeffrey, 2001. "The Role of Sensory-Specific Satiety in Attribute-Level Variety Seeking," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 105-120, June.
    4. MacKenzie, Scott B, 1986. "The Role of Attention in Mediating the Effect of Advertising on Attribute Importance," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(2), pages 174-195, September.
    5. J. R. Hicks, 1963. "The Theory of Wages," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-00189-7, December.
    6. McAlister, Leigh & Pessemier, Edgar, 1982. "Variety Seeking Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Review," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(3), pages 311-322, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Uzma Khan & Alexander DePaoli, 2024. "Brand loyalty in the face of stockouts," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 44-74, January.
    2. Hana Trollman & Sandeep Jagtap & Frank Trollman, 2023. "Crowdsourcing food security: introducing food choice derivatives for sustainability," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(4), pages 953-965, August.
    3. Zachary G. Arens & Rebecca W. Hamilton, 2018. "The substitution strategy dilemma: substitute selection versus substitute effectiveness," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 130-146, January.
    4. Rebecca Hamilton & Debora Thompson & Sterling Bone & Lan Nguyen Chaplin & Vladas Griskevicius & Kelly Goldsmith & Ronald Hill & Deborah Roedder John & Chiraag Mittal & Thomas O’Guinn & Paul Piff & Car, 2019. "The effects of scarcity on consumer decision journeys," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 532-550, May.
    5. Hoang, Dong & Breugelmans, Els, 2023. "“Sorry, the product you ordered is out of stock”: Effects of substitution policy in online grocery retailing," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 26-45.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bee-Lia Chua & Shahrim Karim & Sanghyeop Lee & Heesup Han, 2020. "Customer Restaurant Choice: An Empirical Analysis of Restaurant Types and Eating-Out Occasions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Joo-Eon Jeon & Eun Mi Lee, 2020. "The Effect of Sensory Satiety on Perceived Benefits: The Case of Aesthetic Consumption in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Kwon, Ohjin & Singh, Tanya & Kim, SunAh, 2023. "The competing roles of variety seeking in new brand adoption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Spassova, Gerri & Isen, Alice M., 2013. "Positive affect moderates the impact of assortment size on choice satisfaction," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(4), pages 397-408.
    5. Desai, Kalpesh Kaushik & Trivedi, Minakshi, 2014. "Do consumer perceptions matter in measuring choice variety and variety seeking?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2786-2792.
    6. Wang, Xia & Sun, Luping & Keh, Hean Tat, 2013. "Consumer responses to variety in product bundles: The moderating role of evaluation mode," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 335-342.
    7. Jordan Etkin & Cassie Mogilner, 2016. "Does Variety Among Activities Increase Happiness?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 210-229.
    8. Cammy Crolic & Chris Janiszewski, 2016. "Hedonic Escalation: When Food Just Tastes Better and Better," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(3), pages 388-406.
    9. Irene Consiglio & Stijn M J van Osselaer & Darren W DahlEditor & Amna KirmaniEditor & L J ShrumAssociate Editor, 2019. "The Devil You Know: Self-Esteem and Switching Responses to Poor Service," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(3), pages 590-605.
    10. Irani-Kermani, Roozbeh & Jaenicke, Edward C., 2018. "Generalizing Variety Seeking Measurement from Brand Space to Product Attribute Space," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273818, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Wang, Yan & Jiang, Jing & Yang, Ying, 2023. "Magic odd numbers: The effect of numerical parity on variety-seeking," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    12. Antón, Carmen & Camarero, Carmen & Garrido, María-José, 2018. "A journey through the museum: Visit factors that prevent or further visitor satiation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 48-61.
    13. Murray, Scott D. & Jin, Hyun Seung & Martin, Brett A.S., 2022. "The role of shopping orientation in variety-seeking behaviour," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 188-197.
    14. Liberali, Guilherme & Gruca, Thomas S. & Nique, Walter M., 2011. "The effects of sensitization and habituation in durable goods markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 398-410, July.
    15. Martinovici, A., 2019. "Revealing attention - how eye movements predict brand choice and moment of choice," Other publications TiSEM 7dca38a5-9f78-4aee-bd81-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Benoît Lyrette & Paul-Martel Roy, 1992. "Le régime des décrets favorise-t-il la paix industrielle? L'expérience des activités manufacturières québécoises, 1980-1988," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 18(3), pages 261-274, September.
    17. Andreas Herrmann & Michael D. Johnson, 1999. "Die Kundenzufriedenheit als Bestimmungsfaktor der Kundenbindung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 579-598, June.
    18. Ryuzo Sato & Tamaki Morita, 2009. "Quantity Or Quality: The Impact Of Labour Saving Innovation On Us And Japanese Growth Rates, 1960–2004," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 60(4), pages 407-434, December.
    19. Francesca Bassi & Fulvia Pennoni & Luca Rossetto, 2020. "The Italian market of sparkling wines: Latent variable models for brand positioning, customer loyalty, and transitions across brands' preferences," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 542-567, October.
    20. Jaehwan Kim & Greg M. Allenby & Peter E. Rossi, 2002. "Modeling Consumer Demand for Variety," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 229-250, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:43:y:2016:i:3:p:448-459.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.