IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijrema/v30y2013i4p335-342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer responses to variety in product bundles: The moderating role of evaluation mode

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Xia
  • Sun, Luping
  • Keh, Hean Tat

Abstract

This article examines the moderating effect of evaluation mode on consumer responses to variety in product bundles. Study 1 finds that consumer preference for the variety bundle (relative to the non-variety bundle) is higher in the joint evaluation mode than in the separate evaluation mode. Study 2 provides evidence that the increased preference for the variety bundle in joint evaluation is driven by the activation of concerns about satiation. Specifically, we find that both the quantity of items in and the category of the non-variety bundle influence consumer concern for satiation and the evaluation of the variety bundle. Study 3 further examines the proposed mechanism by manipulating the information associated with repetition and finds that associating repetition with loyalty (vs. satiation) eliminates the moderating effect of evaluation mode on the preference for variety. We discuss the findings and their implications for marketers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Xia & Sun, Luping & Keh, Hean Tat, 2013. "Consumer responses to variety in product bundles: The moderating role of evaluation mode," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 335-342.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:30:y:2013:i:4:p:335-342
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.03.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811613000517
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.03.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:3:p:230-238 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jeff Galak & Joseph P. Redden & Justin Kruger, 2009. "Variety Amnesia: Recalling Past Variety Can Accelerate Recovery from Satiation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(4), pages 575-584, December.
    3. Kahn, Barbara E & Isen, Alice M, 1993. "The Influence of Positive Affect on Variety Seeking among Safe, Enjoyable Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(2), pages 257-270, September.
    4. Ratner, Rebecca K & Kahn, Barbara E, 2002. "The Impact of Private versus Public Consumption on Variety-Seeking Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(2), pages 246-257, September.
    5. Cassie Mogilner & Tamar Rudnick & Sheena S. Iyengar, 2008. "The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers' Perceptions of Assortment Variety and Outcome Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(2), pages 202-215, June.
    6. Hsee, Christopher K., 1996. "The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 247-257, September.
    7. Daniel Kahneman & Richard H. Thaler, 2006. "Anomalies: Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(1), pages 221-234, Winter.
    8. Inman, J Jeffrey, 2001. "The Role of Sensory-Specific Satiety in Attribute-Level Variety Seeking," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 105-120, June.
    9. Kahn, Barbara E & Wansink, Brian, 2004. "The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(4), pages 519-533, March.
    10. McAlister, Leigh, 1982. "A Dynamic Attribute Satiation Model of Variety-Seeking Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 141-150, September.
    11. McAlister, Leigh & Pessemier, Edgar, 1982. "Variety Seeking Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Review," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(3), pages 311-322, December.
    12. Cassie Mogilner & Tamar Rudnick & Sheena Iyengar, 2008. "The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers' Perceptions of Assortment Variety," Economics Working Papers 0070, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science.
    13. Ratner, Rebecca K & Kahn, Barbara E & Kahneman, Daniel, 1999. "Choosing Less-Preferred Experiences for the Sake of Variety," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhenhua Gao & Luyao Zhao & Hongjun Wang, 2022. "Supply Chain Coordination of Product and Service Bundling Based on Network Externalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Reeti Agarwal, 2018. "Indian Customers’ Attitude Towards Bundling: A Basis for Classification and Targeting," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(2), pages 510-531, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spassova, Gerri & Isen, Alice M., 2013. "Positive affect moderates the impact of assortment size on choice satisfaction," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(4), pages 397-408.
    2. Jordan Etkin & Cassie Mogilner, 2016. "Does Variety Among Activities Increase Happiness?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 210-229.
    3. Wu, Pei-Hsun & Kao, Danny Tengti, 2011. "Goal orientation and variety seeking behavior: The role of decision task," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 65-72, February.
    4. Pan Li & Alexander Tuzhilin, 2024. "When Variety Seeking Meets Unexpectedness: Incorporating Variety-Seeking Behaviors into Design of Unexpected Recommender Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1257-1273, September.
    5. Mohan, Geetha & Sivakumaran, Bharadhwaj & Sharma, Piyush, 2012. "Store environment's impact on variety seeking behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 419-428.
    6. Hee Jin Kim & Song Oh Yoon, 2016. "The effect of category label specificity on consumer choice," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 765-777, December.
    7. Desai, Kalpesh Kaushik & Trivedi, Minakshi, 2014. "Do consumer perceptions matter in measuring choice variety and variety seeking?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2786-2792.
    8. Martenson, Rita, 2018. "Curiosity motivated vacation destination choice in a reward and variety-seeking perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 70-78.
    9. Antón, Carmen & Camarero, Carmen & Garrido, María-José, 2018. "A journey through the museum: Visit factors that prevent or further visitor satiation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 48-61.
    10. Murray, Scott D. & Jin, Hyun Seung & Martin, Brett A.S., 2022. "The role of shopping orientation in variety-seeking behaviour," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 188-197.
    11. Javornik, Ana & Marder, Ben & Pizzetti, Marta & Warlop, Luk, 2021. "Augmented self - The effects of virtual face augmentation on consumers' self-concept," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 170-187.
    12. Kahn, Barbara E., 2017. "Using Visual Design to Improve Customer Perceptions of Online Assortments," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 29-42.
    13. Liang Huang & Rafay A. Siddiqui & Anastasiya Pocheptsova Ghosh, 2024. "More of the same: Painful payment methods decrease variety seeking," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 533-545, December.
    14. Kim, Jungkeun, 2020. "Impact of the perceived threat of COVID-19 on variety-seeking," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 108-116.
    15. Yan, Huan & Chang, En-Chung & Chou, Ting-Jui & Tang, Xiaofei, 2015. "The over-categorization effect: How the number of categorizations influences shoppers' perceptions of variety and satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 631-638.
    16. Chang, Chingching, 2011. "The Effect of the Number of Product Subcategories on Perceived Variety and Shopping Experience in an Online Store," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 159-168.
    17. Mantrala, Murali K. & Levy, Michael & Kahn, Barbara E. & Fox, Edward J. & Gaidarev, Peter & Dankworth, Bill & Shah, Denish, 2009. "Why is Assortment Planning so Difficult for Retailers? A Framework and Research Agenda," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 71-83.
    18. repec:cup:judgdm:v:12:y:2017:i:1:p:42-59 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Helena Szrek, 2017. "How the number of options and perceived variety influence choice satisfaction: An experiment with prescription drug plans," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 12(1), pages 42-59, January.
    20. Ali Besharat & Gia Nardini & Rhiannon MacDonnell Mesler, 2024. "Bringing Ethical Consumption to the Forefront in Emerging Markets: The Role of Product Categorization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(4), pages 777-792, May.
    21. Gabriele Pizzi & Gian Luca Marzocchi, 2020. "Consumer-defined assortments: application of card-sorting to category management," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(1), pages 67-84, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:30:y:2013:i:4:p:335-342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-research-in-marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.