IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v103y2016i1p35-47..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonparametric Bayes inference on conditional independence

Author

Listed:
  • Tsuyoshi Kunihama
  • David B. Dunson

Abstract

In many application areas, a primary focus is on assessing evidence in the data refuting the assumption of independence of $Y$ and $X$ conditionally on $Z$, with $Y$ response variables, $X$ predictors of interest, and $Z$ covariates. Ideally, one would have methods available that avoid parametric assumptions, allow $Y, X, Z$ to be random variables on arbitrary spaces with arbitrary dimension, and accommodate rapid consideration of different candidate predictors. As a formal decision-theoretic approach has clear disadvantages in this context, we instead rely on an encompassing nonparametric Bayes model for the joint distribution of $Y$, $X$ and $Z$, with conditional mutual information used as a summary of the strength of conditional dependence. We construct a functional of the encompassing model and empirical measure for estimation of conditional mutual information. The implementation relies on a single Markov chain Monte Carlo run under the encompassing model, with conditional mutual information for candidate models calculated as a byproduct. We provide an asymptotic theory supporting the approach, and apply the method to variable selection. The methods are illustrated through simulations and criminology applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsuyoshi Kunihama & David B. Dunson, 2016. "Nonparametric Bayes inference on conditional independence," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(1), pages 35-47.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:103:y:2016:i:1:p:35-47.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asv060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Su, Liangjun & White, Halbert, 2008. "A Nonparametric Hellinger Metric Test For Conditional Independence," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 829-864, August.
    2. Brian J. Reich & Eric Kalendra & Curtis B. Storlie & Howard D. Bondell & Montserrat Fuentes, 2012. "Variable selection for high dimensional Bayesian density estimation: application to human exposure simulation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(1), pages 47-66, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryo Kato & Takahiro Hoshino, 2018. "Semiparametric Bayes Instrumental Variable Estimation with Many Weak Instruments," Discussion Paper Series DP2018-14, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    2. Tsuyoshi Kunihama & Zehang Richard Li & Samuel J. Clark & Tyler H. McCormick, 2018. "Bayesian factor models for probabilistic cause of death assessment with verbal autopsies," Discussion Paper Series 177, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised Mar 2018.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taoufik Bouezmarni & Mohamed Doukali & Abderrahim Taamouti, 2024. "Testing Granger non-causality in expectiles," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 30-51, January.
    2. Hoderlein, Stefan & Su, Liangjun & White, Halbert & Yang, Thomas Tao, 2016. "Testing for monotonicity in unobservables under unconfoundedness," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 183-202.
    3. Sungwon Lee & Joon H. Ro, 2020. "Nonparametric Tests for Conditional Quantile Independence with Duration Outcomes," Working Papers 2013, Nam Duck-Woo Economic Research Institute, Sogang University (Former Research Institute for Market Economy).
    4. Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2012. "From the “European Paradox” to a European Drama in citation impact," UC3M Working papers. Economics we1211, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    5. Bertrand Candelon & Sessi Tokpavi, 2016. "A Nonparametric Test for Granger Causality in Distribution With Application to Financial Contagion," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 240-253, April.
    6. Gaurab Aryal & Isabelle Perrigne & Quang Vuong, 2011. "Identification of Insurance Models with Multidimensional Screening," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2011-538, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    7. Fan, Jianqing & Feng, Yang & Xia, Lucy, 2020. "A projection-based conditional dependence measure with applications to high-dimensional undirected graphical models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 119-139.
    8. Dong, Hao & Taylor, Luke, 2022. "Nonparametric Significance Testing In Measurement Error Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(3), pages 454-496, June.
    9. Huang, Meng & Sun, Yixiao & White, Halbert, 2016. "A Flexible Nonparametric Test For Conditional Independence," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(6), pages 1434-1482, December.
    10. Li, Haiqi & Zhong, Wanling & Park, Sung Y., 2016. "Generalized cross-spectral test for nonlinear Granger causality with applications to money–output and price–volume relations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 661-671.
    11. Su, Liangjun & White, Halbert, 2014. "Testing conditional independence via empirical likelihood," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 27-44.
    12. Bianchi, Pascal & Elgui, Kevin & Portier, François, 2023. "Conditional independence testing via weighted partial copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    13. Semei Coronado & Rebeca Jim'enez-Rodr'iguez & Omar Rojas, 2015. "An empirical analysis of the relationships between crude oil, gold and stock markets," Papers 1510.07599, arXiv.org, revised May 2016.
    14. Cheng, Yu-Hsiang & Huang, Tzee-Ming, 2012. "A conditional independence test for dependent data based on maximal conditional correlation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 210-226.
    15. Bertrand Candelon & Sessi Tokpavi, 2016. "A Nonparametric Test for Granger Causality in Distribution With Application to Financial Contagion," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 240-253, April.
    16. Sokbae Lee & Yoon-Jae Whang, 2009. "Nonparametric Tests of Conditional Treatment Effects," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1740, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    17. Xiaojun Song & Haoyu Wei, 2021. "Nonparametric Tests of Conditional Independence for Time Series," Papers 2110.04847, arXiv.org.
    18. Xu, Kai & Cheng, Qing, 2024. "Test of conditional independence in factor models via Hilbert–Schmidt independence criterion," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Polanco-Martínez, J.M. & Fernández-Macho, J. & Neumann, M.B. & Faria, S.H., 2018. "A pre-crisis vs. crisis analysis of peripheral EU stock markets by means of wavelet transform and a nonlinear causality test," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 1211-1227.
    20. Taoufik Bouezmarni & Jeroen V.K. Rombouts & Abderrahim Taamouti, 2011. "Nonparametric Copula-Based Test for Conditional Independence with Applications to Granger Causality," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 275-287, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:103:y:2016:i:1:p:35-47.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.