IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/jrojbe/v7y2022ispecialp100-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is The Financial Performance Affected By Board Characteristics During Covid-19? Evidence From The Energy Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Pompei Mititean

    (Accounting Doctoral School, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the impact of board’s characteristics on the financial performance of firms operating in the energy industry, during a certain and uncertain time. For this purpose, we chose four board’s characteristics: duality of the CEO, size of the board, the board meetings and board’s independence, which represent our independent variables. For measuring financial performance, we chose the Return of Assets (ROA) and Return of Equity (ROE) ratios. The data used was collected from Refinitiv Eikon database and includes a sample of 359 companies, for the period 2018-2021. The SPSS statistical program was used to run the regression model on the selected sample. This study provides mixed results on the impact on board’s characteristics on the financial performance of companies operating in the energy industry. During certain time, CEO duality and board’s meetings are negatively correlated with ROE, but positively correlated with ROA. The size and board’s independence negatively affect the financial performance of companies for both ROA and ROE before and during COVID-19. This article contributes to previous studies conducted on the link between corporate governance and firm financial performance, showing mixed results. The results obtained may help management companies to carry out their corporate governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Pompei Mititean, 2022. "Is The Financial Performance Affected By Board Characteristics During Covid-19? Evidence From The Energy Industry," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 7(special), pages 100-110, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:7:y:2022:i:special:p:100-110
    DOI: http://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ojbe.steconomiceuoradea.ro/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/OJBE-7special-100-110.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2005. "Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem in dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(1), pages 39-54, January.
    2. Chung‐Hua Shen & Hsiang‐Lin Chih, 2007. "Earnings Management and Corporate Governance in Asia's Emerging Markets," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 999-1021, September.
    3. Detthamrong, Umawadee & Chancharat, Nongnit & Vithessonthi, Chaiporn, 2017. "Corporate governance, capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Thailand," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 689-709.
    4. Kojima Koji & Bishnu Kumar Adhikary & Le Tram, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Comparative Analysis between Listed Family and Non-Family Firms in Japan," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Jacqueline Christensen & Pamela Kent & Jenny Stewart, 2010. "Corporate Governance and Company Performance in Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(4), pages 372-386, December.
    6. Yuan George Shan, 2019. "Managerial ownership, board independence and firm performance," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(2), pages 203-220, July.
    7. Anjala Kalsie & Shikha Mittal Shrivastav, 2016. "Analysis of Board Size and Firm Performance: Evidence from NSE Companies Using Panel Data Approach," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 9(2), pages 148-172, December.
    8. Duru, Augustine & Iyengar, Raghavan J. & Zampelli, Ernest M., 2016. "The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4269-4277.
    9. Uribe-Bohorquez, María-Victoria & Martínez-Ferrero, Jennifer & García-Sánchez, Isabel-María, 2018. "Board independence and firm performance: The moderating effect of institutional context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 28-43.
    10. Tang, Jianyun, 2017. "CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating roles of other executives and blockholding outside directors," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 362-372.
    11. Aswini Kumar Mishra & Shikhar Jain & R. L. Manogna, 2021. "Does corporate governance characteristics influence firm performance in India? Empirical evidence using dynamic panel data analysis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 71-82, March.
    12. Taher Hamza & Nada Mselmi, 2017. "Corporate Governance and Equity Prices: The Effect of Board of Directors and Audit Committee Independence," Post-Print hal-03528491, HAL.
    13. Paniagua, Jordi & Rivelles, Rafael & Sapena, Juan, 2018. "Corporate governance and financial performance: The role of ownership and board structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 229-234.
    14. Bhagat, Sanjai & Bolton, Brian, 2008. "Corporate governance and firm performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 257-273, June.
    15. Najib H.S. Farhan & Faozi A. Almaqtari & Mosab I. Tabash & Eissa A. Al-Homaidi, 2022. "The impact of corporate governance on financial performance of Indian hotels: cluster analysis," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 24-58.
    16. Taher Hamza & Nada Mselmi, 2017. "Corporate Governance and Equity Prices: The Effect of Board of Directors and Audit Committee Independence," Post-Print hal-03380724, HAL.
    17. Seoki Lee & Michael C. Dalbor, 2013. "Short-Term Debt and Firm Performance in the US Restaurant Industry: The Moderating Role of Economic Conditions," Tourism Economics, , vol. 19(3), pages 565-581, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pompei Mititean, 2022. "The Impact Of Corporate Governance Characteristics On Companies’ Financial Performance: Evidence From Romania," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 67(233), pages 113-134, April – J.
    2. Chiu-Hui Wu, 2021. "On the Moderating Effects of Country Governance on the Relationships between Corporate Governance and Firm Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Shamsul Nahar Abdullah & Azbariyah Aziz & Aizulfithri Azani, 2022. "The Effect of Board Independence, Gender Diversity and Board Size on Firm Performance in Malaysia," Journal of Social Economics Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 9(4), pages 179-192.
    4. Mukesh Nepal & Rajat Deb, 2022. "Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Indian Textiles Sector Panorama," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 47(1), pages 74-96, February.
    5. Akbar, Muhammad & Hussain, Shahzad & Ahmad, Tanveer & Hassan, Shoib, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Pakistan: Dynamic Panel Estimation," CAFE Working Papers 6, Centre for Accountancy, Finance and Economics (CAFE), Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University.
    6. Marwan Mansour & Hamzeh Al Amosh & Ahmad Yuosef Alodat & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Mohammed W. A. Saleh, 2022. "The Relationship between Corporate Governance Quality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Capital Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Mosab I. Tabash & Adel Ahmed & Linda Nalini Daniel & Yasmeen Elsantil, 2023. "Impact of Board Ownership Structure on Firm Value and Excessive Cash Holdings: Evidence from Pakistan," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 27(3), pages 109-134, September.
    8. Wang PeiZhi & Muhammad Ramzan, 2020. "Do corporate governance structure and capital structure matter for the performance of the firms? An empirical testing with the contemplation of outliers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Anup Banerjee & Mattias Nordqvist & Karin Hellerstedt, 2020. "The role of the board chair—A literature review and suggestions for future research," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 372-405, November.
    10. Nebyu Adamu Abebe & Navkiranjit Kaur Dhaliwal, 2024. "An empirical investigation of corporate governance attributes and firm performance: evidence from the ethiopian insurance industry," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(10), pages 1-25, October.
    11. Tatiana Dănescu & Ioan-Ovidiu Spătăcean & Maria-Alexandra Popa & Carmen-Gabriela Sîrbu, 2021. "The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanism over Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    12. Riaqa Mubeen & Dongping Han & Jaffar Abbas & Iftikhar Hussain, 2020. "The Effects of Market Competition, Capital Structure, and CEO Duality on Firm Performance: A Mediation Analysis by Incorporating the GMM Model Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Ben Slimane, Faten & Padilla Angulo, Laura, 2019. "Strategic change and corporate governance: Evidence from the stock exchange industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 206-218.
    14. Martha Coleman & Mengyun Wu & Mark Baidoo, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Working Capital Policy: An Unobserved Influence," Emerging Economy Studies, International Management Institute, vol. 6(1), pages 106-122, May.
    15. Omar Farooque & Wonlop Buachoom & Nam Hoang, 2019. "Interactive effects of executive compensation, firm performance and corporate governance: Evidence from an Asian market," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1111-1164, December.
    16. Tutun Mukherjee & Som Sankar Sen, 2022. "Impact of CEO attributes on corporate reputation, financial performance, and corporate sustainable growth: evidence from India," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-50, December.
    17. Aswini Kumar Mishra & Shikhar Jain & R. L. Manogna, 2021. "Does corporate governance characteristics influence firm performance in India? Empirical evidence using dynamic panel data analysis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 71-82, March.
    18. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, June.
    19. Helmi A. Boshnak, 2024. "Ownership concentration, managerial ownership, and firm performance in Saudi listed firms," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 462-475, September.
    20. Muhammad Azeem Naz & Rizwan Ali & Ramiz Ur Rehman & Collins G. Ntim, 2022. "Corporate governance, working capital management, and firm performance: Some new insights from agency theory," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1448-1461, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    board characteristics; corporate governance; COVID-19; energy industry; financial performance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:7:y:2022:i:special:p:100-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomina SAVEANU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.