IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2013i1p618-630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Governance Committees In European Union Emerging Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela Dumitrascu

    (Accounting Department, Faculty of Accounting and Management Informatic System, Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Andra Gajevszky

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the support committees of European Union emerging economies. The importance of good corporate governance is vital for an organization, especially in the emerging markets, fact that leads to a several perceived improvements of the entity, while being more trustable, open and transparent in relationship with all its stakeholders. In our demarche we started by choosing the emerging economies from European Union, which lead us to a sample consisting of the companies listed on Bucharest Stock Exchange, Sofia Stock Exchange, Warsaw Stock Exchange, Prague Stock Exchange, Budapest Stock Exchange, without taking into consideration a specific tier. In order to have a heterogeneous sample, we did eliminate the financial institutions from our research. This study is developed at European Union level and takes into consideration the following indices: BET(r) BUCHAREST EXCHANGE TRADING (Romania), SOFIX (Bulgaria), WIG 20 (Poland), PX (Czech Republic), BUX The Share Index of the Budapest Stock Exchange Co. Ltd. (Hungary). The data are extracted from the Annual Reports, Corporate Governance Codes, Comply or Explain Statement or the websites of the listed companies, from period 2007 - 2011. We choose this period, because we wanted to see the evolution of the corporate governance committees' implementation from the period when the last countries from our sample joined the European Union since nowadays. Our conclusion is that we can not discuss about good corporate governance practices. Even so, we can observe from our investigation that the trend in this regard is encouraging. Like future research, we thought at developing our study by comparing the emerging economies from European Union with those outside this area. It is an interesting field of investigation, as every country has different regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela Dumitrascu & Andra Gajevszky, 2013. "Corporate Governance Committees In European Union Emerging Economies," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 618-630, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:618-630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2013/n1/066.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sir Adrian Cadbury, 2000. "The Corporate Governance Agenda," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 7-15, January.
    2. Niels Hermes & Theo J.B.M. Postma & Orestis Zivkov, 2006. "Corporate governance codes in the European Union: Are they driven by external or domestic forces?," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 2(4), pages 280-301, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naz Sayari & Bill Marcum, 2018. "Do US Corporate Governance Standards Effectively Discourage Risk in the Emerging Markets?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(2), pages 167-185, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Kyere & Marcel Ausloos, 2021. "Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1871-1885, April.
    2. Al-Najjar, Basil & Salama, Aly, 2022. "Mind the gap: Are female directors and executives more sensitive to the environment in high-tech us firms?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Ian Jones & Michael Pollitt, 2004. "Understanding How Issues in Corporate Governance Develop: Cadbury Report to Higgs Review," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 162-171, April.
    4. Ian W. Jones & Michael G. Pollitt, 2002. "Who Influences Debates in Business Ethics? An Investigation into the Development of Corporate Governance in the UK since 1990," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Ian W. Jones & Michael G. Pollitt (ed.), Understanding How Issues in Business Ethics Develop, chapter 2, pages 14-68, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Dr. Abdullah Ahmed Aldaas & Dr. Suleiman Jamal Mohammad & Dr. Mohammad Yousef Abuhashesh, 2019. "Successful Implementation of Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Banks," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 8(4), pages 692-710, October.
    6. Cate Watson & Gary Husband & Aileen Ireland, 2021. "Opening the ‘black box’: what does observational research reveal about processes and practices of governing?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 189-221, March.
    7. Nguyen, Thi Tuyet Mai, 2017. "An examination of independent directors in Vietnam," OSF Preprints ay6dv, Center for Open Science.
    8. Dumitrascu Luminita Mihaela, 2012. "The Sound Of Corporate Governance," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 921-924, July.
    9. Chahine, Salim & Filatotchev, Igor, 2011. "The effects of corporate governance and audit and non-audit fees on IPO Value," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 155-172.
    10. Huseynov, Fariz & Klamm, Bonnie K., 2012. "Tax avoidance, tax management and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 804-827.
    11. Dima Jamali & Asem M. Safieddine & Myriam Rabbath, 2008. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 443-459, September.
    12. Gole Pedja Ašanin, 2024. "Dimensions of Corporate Governance in Public Relations Literature: A Systematic Review," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 70(2), pages 63-73.
    13. Cate Watson & Aileen Ireland, 2021. "Boards in action: processes and practices of ‘strategising’ in the Boardroom," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 933-966, September.
    14. Gangi, Francesco & Meles, Antonio & Monferrà, Stefano & Mustilli, Mario, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility help the survivorship of SMEs and large firms?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    15. Yu-Hui Wang, 2020. "Does Board Gender Diversity Bring Better Financial and Governance Performances? An Empirical Investigation of Cases in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-10, April.
    16. Afshin Najafgholi Doust & Asgar Pakmaram, 2015. "Investigating Effect of Governmental Ownership on the Investment Decisions of Managers," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 5(3), pages 14-32, July.
    17. Mireille Chidiac El Hajj, 2018. "A closer look at the corporate governance in Lebanon: A call for a bottom-up reform," Post-Print hal-04085842, HAL.
    18. Kumanomido, Hiroshi & Takayasu, Yutaro, 2024. "Elite Persistence in Family: The Role of Adoption in Prewar Japan," OSF Preprints rmdyp, Center for Open Science.
    19. Muzhar Javed & Muhammad Waheed Akhtar & Mudassir Husnain & Rabnawaz Lodhi & Sonia Emaan, 2020. "A stakeholder‐centric paradigm bids well for the “business case” ‐ An investigation through moderated‐mediation model," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2563-2577, November.
    20. Areneke, Geofry & Kimani, Danson, 2019. "Value relevance of multinational directorship and cross-listing on MNEs national governance disclosure practices in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Nigeria," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 285-306.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate governance; committees; emerging economies; transparency;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:618-630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Catalin ZMOLE to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.