IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onb/oenbfs/y2021i42b2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supplement to “OeNB climate risk stress test – modeling a carbon price shock for the Austrian banking sector”

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This supplement contains the formal write-up of the sectoral carbon price model as described in detail, albeit in natural language in section 3.1 of the paper “OeNB climate risk stress test – modeling a carbon price shock for the Austrian banking sector” in the OeNB’s Financial Stability Report 42. The sectoral carbon price model is implemented as a multiregional input-output analysis for 21 NACE sectors in the 27 countries of the European Union. We start with a short introduction to input-analysis and carbon prices, section 2 is then structured along the five calculation steps of our input-output model: 1) carbon price shocks, 2) price model with incomplete cost pass-through, 3) final demand model, 4) quantity model and 5) second-round effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Csilla Königswieser & Benjamin Neudorfer & Martin Schneider, 2021. "Supplement to “OeNB climate risk stress test – modeling a carbon price shock for the Austrian banking sector”," Financial Stability Report, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 42.
    • Handle: RePEc:onb:oenbfs:y:2021:i:42:b:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:e3202259-f45e-4b25-9add-a01ff8f7c24e/Supplement_OeNB_climate_risk_stress_test.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernando MARTINS & Daniel A. DIAS & J.M.C. SANTOS SILVA & Carlos ROBALO MARQUES, 2010. "Why are some prices stickier than others? Firm-data evidence on price adjustment lags," EcoMod2010 259600114, EcoMod.
    2. Martin Guth & Christian Lipp & Claus Puhr & Martin Schneider, 2020. "Modeling the COVID-19 effects on the Austrian economy and banking system," Financial Stability Report, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 40, pages 63-86.
    3. Markus Leibrecht & Martin Schneider, 2006. "AQM-06: The Macro economic Model of the OeNB," Working Papers 132, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).
    4. repec:onb:oenbwp:y::i:132:b:1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Corbett Grainger & Charles Kolstad, 2010. "Who Pays a Price on Carbon?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 46(3), pages 359-376, July.
    6. Nicolas Gonne, 2016. "Assessing the Impact of Carbon Taxation on sectoral Competitiveness: the Case of Belgium," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 27-40.
    7. Kevin Perese, 2010. "Input-Output Model Analysis: Pricing Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Working Paper 2010-04," Working Papers 21538, Congressional Budget Office.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghosh, Saibal, 2023. "Does climate legislation matter for bank lending? Evidence from MENA countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Guth & Jannika Hesse & Csilla Königswieser & Gerald Krenn & Christian Lipp & Benjamin Neudorfer & Martin Schneider & Philipp Weiss, 2021. "OeNB climate risk stress test – modeling a carbon price shock for the Austrian banking sector," Financial Stability Report, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 42, pages 27-45.
    2. Brown, Marilyn A. & Li, Yufei & Soni, Anmol, 2020. "Are all jobs created equal? Regional employment impacts of a U.S. carbon tax," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    3. Macdonald, Kevin & Patrinos, Harry Anthony, 2021. "Education Quality, Green Technology, and the Economic Impact of Carbon Pricing," GLO Discussion Paper Series 955, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    4. Katri Kosonen, 2012. "Regressivity of environmental taxation: myth or reality?," Taxation Papers 32, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    5. Stephie Fried & Kevin Novan & William B. Peterman, 2021. "Recycling Carbon Tax Revenue to Maximize Welfare," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2021-023, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    6. Haan, Peter & Simmler, Martin, 2018. "Wind electricity subsidies — A windfall for landowners? Evidence from a feed-in tariff in Germany," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 16-32.
    7. Luong, Phat V. & Xu, Xiaowei, 2020. "Pass-through of commodity price shocks in distribution channels with risk-averse agents," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    8. Julie Anne Cronin & Don Fullerton & Steven Sexton, 2019. "Vertical and Horizontal Redistributions from a Carbon Tax and Rebate," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(S1), pages 169-208.
    9. Tran, Trang, 2015. "The Distributional and Welfare Effects of the Australian Emissions Trading Scheme," Conference papers 332652, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Peter Grösche & Carsten Schröder, 2014. "On the redistributive effects of Germany’s feed-in tariff," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1339-1383, June.
    11. Corbett Grainger & Thanicha Ruangmas, 2018. "Who Wins from Emissions Trading? Evidence from California," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(3), pages 703-727, November.
    12. Nils Ohlendorf & Michael Jakob & Jan Christoph Minx & Carsten Schröder & Jan Christoph Steckel, 2021. "Distributional Impacts of Carbon Pricing: A Meta-Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(1), pages 1-42, January.
    13. Arik Levinson, 2019. "Energy Efficiency Standards Are More Regressive Than Energy Taxes: Theory and Evidence," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(S1), pages 7-36.
    14. Frache, Serafin & Lluberas, Rodrigo & Turen, Javier, 2024. "Belief-dependent pricing decisions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    15. Frederick Ploeg, 2021. "Carbon pricing under uncertainty," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 28(5), pages 1122-1142, October.
    16. Roberton C. Williams III, 2016. "Environmental Taxation," NBER Working Papers 22303, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Carl Romanos & Suzi Kerr & Campbell Will, 2014. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions in New Zealand: A Preliminary Consumption-Based Analysis," Working Papers 14_05, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    18. Sharat Ganapati & Joseph S. Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2016. "The Incidence of Carbon Taxes in U.S. Manufacturing: Lessons from Energy Cost Pass-through," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2038R3, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Mar 2018.
    19. Grainger, Corbett & Schreiber, Andrew & Zhang, Fan, 2019. "Distributional impacts of energy-heat cross-subsidization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 65-81.
    20. Ditya Agung Nurdianto, 2016. "Economic Impacts of a Carbon Tax in an Integrated ASEAN," EEPSEA Special and Technical Paper tp201604t5, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Apr 2016.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onb:oenbfs:y:2021:i:42:b:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefan W. Schmitz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oenbbat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.