IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v192y2024ics0301421524002301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The many faces of carbon tax regressivity—Why carbon taxes are not always regressive for the same reason

Author

Listed:
  • Linden, Jules
  • O’Donoghue, Cathal
  • Sologon, Denisa M.

Abstract

Carbon taxes can be regressive for multiple reasons. Differences in what households consume, the carbon-intensive of what they consume, the technology they use, and how much of their income they spend all contribute towards the regressivity of a carbon tax. This paper quantifies the relative importance of these factors for carbon tax regressivity in 6 EU countries. The comparison across countries highlights that differences in what households consume are important, but not always the most important factor in driving carbon tax regressivity. Differences in how much of their income households spend are always important and often the most important factor. Differences in the carbon intensity of consumption are more relevant in Eastern European countries and the importance of heating and transportation technology depends on the country. This paper concludes with implications for designing effective mitigation strategies and cross-country policy transfer, highlighting that the source of carbon tax regressivity and effective strategies differs across countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Linden, Jules & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Sologon, Denisa M., 2024. "The many faces of carbon tax regressivity—Why carbon taxes are not always regressive for the same reason," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:192:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524002301
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524002301
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:192:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524002301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.