IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/eajour/y2013i4p77-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is There Brand Segmentation?

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Kostadinova

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Segmentation has been a central concept in marketing theory and practice for decades. Since F.B. Evans` controversial article "Psychological and objective factors in the prediction of brand choice: Ford versus Chevrolet" (1959) several studies have been conducted in attempt to capture meaningful relationships between brand choice and psychographic, demographic and behavioral variables. The idea that different brands appeal to different profiles of customers is intuitively adopted by practitioners and academics as conventional marketing emphasizes the importance of segmentation, brand differentiation and positioning to marketing success. But does brand preference really discriminates between customers? The purpose of this paper is to present the results of an empirical study of the Bulgarian market for 1) four categories of fast moving consumer goods and 2) three categories of durable products. The main objective of the study is to examine the existence of brand level segmentation of the customers of competing brands

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Kostadinova, 2013. "Is There Brand Segmentation?," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 4, pages 77-85, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2013:i:4:p:77-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unwe.bg/uploads/Alternatives/a09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sha Yang & Gerg M. Allenby & Geraldine Fennel, 2002. "Modeling Variation in Brand Preference: The Roles of Objective Environment and Motivating Conditions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 14-31, May.
    2. Franklin B. Evans, 1968. "Ford Versus Chevrolet: Park Forest Revisited," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41, pages 445-445.
    3. Franklin B. Evans, 1959. "Psychological and Objective Factors in The Prediction of Brand Choice Ford Versus Chevrolet," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32, pages 340-340.
    4. Geraldine Fennell & Greg Allenby & Sha Yang & Yancy Edwards, 2003. "The Effectiveness of Demographic and Psychographic Variables for Explaining Brand and Product Category Use," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 223-244, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junghyun Park & Minki Kim & Pradeep K Chintagunta, 2022. "Mapping Consumers’ Context-Dependent Consumption Preferences: A Multidimensional Unfolding Approach [An Empirical Comparison of Logit Choice Models with Discrete versus Continuous Representations o," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(2), pages 202-228.
    2. Friederike Paetz, 2016. "Persönlichkeitsmerkmale als Segmentierungsvariablen: Eine empirische Studie [Personality traits for market segmentation: An empirical study]," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 279-306, August.
    3. Balabanis, George & Stathopoulou, Anastasia, 2021. "The price of social status desire and public self-consciousness in luxury consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 463-475.
    4. Friederike Paetz & Winfried J. Steiner, 2017. "The benefits of incorporating utility dependencies in finite mixture probit models," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(3), pages 793-819, July.
    5. Cooper, Bethany & Crase, Lin, 2006. "Equity and Efficiency Tradeoffs in Water: Prospects for Choice Modelling," 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia 174097, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Simonson, Itamar, 2007. "Will I Like A "Medium" Pillow? Another Look At Constructed And Inherent Preferences," Research Papers 1977r1, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    7. Wesley R. Hartmann & Daniel Klapper, 2018. "Super Bowl Ads," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 78-96, January.
    8. Olivier Toubia & Duncan I. Simester & John R. Hauser & Ely Dahan, 2003. "Fast Polyhedral Adaptive Conjoint Estimation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 273-303.
    9. Dirk Temme & Marcel Paulssen & Till Dannewald, 2007. "Integrating latent variables in discrete choice models – How higher-order values and attitudes determine consumer choice," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2007-065, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    10. Nobuhiko Terui & Shohei Hasegawa & Greg M. Allenby, 2015. "A Threshold Model for Discontinuous Preference Change and Satiation," TMARG Discussion Papers 122, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    11. Guofang Huang & Ahmed Khwaja & K. Sudhir, 2012. "Short Run Needs and Long Term Goals: A Dynamic Model of Thirst Management," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1856, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    12. Allenby, Greg M., 2017. "Structural forecasts for marketing data," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 433-441.
    13. Guofang Huang & Ahmed Khwaja & K. Sudhir, 2015. "Short-Run Needs and Long-Term Goals: A Dynamic Model of Thirst Management," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 702-721, September.
    14. Nanarpuzha, Rajesh, 2013. "Modeling Situational Factors in Variety Seeking Behaviour: An Extension of the Lightning Bolt Model," IIMA Working Papers WP2013-12-04, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    15. Hu, Wuyang, 2007. "A Choice Model with Systematic Structures in Decision Weights," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(3), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Peter E. Rossi & Greg M. Allenby, 2003. "Bayesian Statistics and Marketing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 304-328, July.
    17. Karsten Hansen & Vishal Singh, 2009. "Market Structure Across Retail Formats," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 656-673, 07-08.
    18. Rhodes, Charles, 2010. "Demographic Variability In U.S. Consumer Responsiveness To Carbonated Soft-Drink Marketing Practices," 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 116419, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Schweidel, David A. & Fader, Peter S., 2009. "Dynamic changepoints revisited: An evolving process model of new product sales," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 119-124.
    20. Yuanyuan Zhou & Qian Li & Shiyang Gong & Daniel P. Hampson & Zhicen Liu, 2023. "Looking back is better than looking forward: visualization, temporal frames, and new product evaluation in China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 829-856, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    segmentation; brand preference; demographics; psychographics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M3 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2013:i:4:p:77-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.