IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v15y2024i1d10.1038_s41467-024-49157-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing costs and climate impacts of various electric vehicle charging systems across the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Noah Horesh

    (Colorado State University)

  • David A. Trinko

    (Colorado State University)

  • Jason C. Quinn

    (Colorado State University)

Abstract

The seamless adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) in the United States necessitates the development of extensive and effective charging infrastructure. Various charging systems have been proposed, including Direct Current Fast Charging, Battery Swapping, and Dynamic Wireless Power Transfer. While many studies have evaluated the charging costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of EVs, a comprehensive analysis comparing these systems and their implications across vehicle categories remains unexplored. This study compares the total cost of ownership (TCO) and GHG-intensity of EVs using these charging systems. Based on nationwide infrastructure deployment simulations, the change to TCO from adopting EVs varies by scenario, vehicle category, and location, with local fuel prices, electricity prices, and traffic volumes dramatically impacting results. Further, EV GHG-intensity depends on local electricity mixes and infrastructure utilizations. This research highlights the responsiveness of EV benefits resulting from technology advancements, deployment decisions, and policymaking.

Suggested Citation

  • Noah Horesh & David A. Trinko & Jason C. Quinn, 2024. "Comparing costs and climate impacts of various electric vehicle charging systems across the United States," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-49157-5
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49157-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-49157-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-49157-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Metais, M.O. & Jouini, O. & Perez, Y. & Berrada, J. & Suomalainen, E., 2022. "Too much or not enough? Planning electric vehicle charging infrastructure: A review of modeling options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Brennan Borlaug & Matteo Muratori & Madeline Gilleran & David Woody & William Muston & Thomas Canada & Andrew Ingram & Hal Gresham & Charlie McQueen, 2021. "Heavy-duty truck electrification and the impacts of depot charging on electricity distribution systems," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(6), pages 673-682, June.
    3. Kristen A. Severson & Peter M. Attia & Norman Jin & Nicholas Perkins & Benben Jiang & Zi Yang & Michael H. Chen & Muratahan Aykol & Patrick K. Herring & Dimitrios Fraggedakis & Martin Z. Bazant & Step, 2019. "Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(5), pages 383-391, May.
    4. Muratori, Matteo & Kontou, Eleftheria & Eichman, Joshua, 2019. "Electricity rates for electric vehicle direct current fast charging in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Lucas, Alexandre & Alexandra Silva, Carla & Costa Neto, Rui, 2012. "Life cycle analysis of energy supply infrastructure for conventional and electric vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 537-547.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lukas Lanz & Bessie Noll & Tobias S. Schmidt & Bjarne Steffen, 2022. "Comparing the levelized cost of electric vehicle charging options in Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Ruixue Liu & Guannan He & Xizhe Wang & Dharik Mallapragada & Hongbo Zhao & Yang Shao-Horn & Benben Jiang, 2024. "A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Jiang, Lidang & Hu, Changyan & Ji, Sibei & Zhao, Hang & Chen, Junxiong & He, Ge, 2025. "Generating comprehensive lithium battery charging data with generative AI," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
    4. Deng, Zhihua & Chan, Siew Hwa & Chen, Qihong & Liu, Hao & Zhang, Liyan & Zhou, Keliang & Tong, Sirui & Fu, Zhichao, 2023. "Efficient degradation prediction of PEMFCs using ELM-AE based on fuzzy extension broad learning system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    5. Wang, Fu-Kwun & Amogne, Zemenu Endalamaw & Chou, Jia-Hong & Tseng, Cheng, 2022. "Online remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries using bidirectional long short-term memory with attention mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    6. Ibraheem, Rasheed & Dechent, Philipp & dos Reis, Gonçalo, 2025. "Path signature-based life prognostics of Li-ion battery using pulse test data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 378(PA).
    7. Li, Guanzheng & Li, Bin & Li, Chao & Wang, Shuai, 2023. "State-of-health rapid estimation for lithium-ion battery based on an interpretable stacking ensemble model with short-term voltage profiles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    8. Das, Kaushik & Kumar, Roushan & Krishna, Anurup, 2024. "Analyzing electric vehicle battery health performance using supervised machine learning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    9. Li, Yi & Liu, Kailong & Foley, Aoife M. & Zülke, Alana & Berecibar, Maitane & Nanini-Maury, Elise & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Hoster, Harry E., 2019. "Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Gu, Xubo & Bai, Hanyu & Cui, Xiaofan & Zhu, Juner & Zhuang, Weichao & Li, Zhaojian & Hu, Xiaosong & Song, Ziyou, 2024. "Challenges and opportunities for second-life batteries: Key technologies and economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    11. Zhang, Jiusi & Jiang, Yuchen & Li, Xiang & Huo, Mingyi & Luo, Hao & Yin, Shen, 2022. "An adaptive remaining useful life prediction approach for single battery with unlabeled small sample data and parameter uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Wang, Yixiu & Zhu, Jiangong & Cao, Liang & Gopaluni, Bhushan & Cao, Yankai, 2023. "Long Short-Term Memory Network with Transfer Learning for Lithium-ion Battery Capacity Fade and Cycle Life Prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    13. Lefeng, Shi & Shengnan, Lv & Chunxiu, Liu & Yue, Zhou & Cipcigan, Liana & Acker, Thomas L., 2020. "A framework for electric vehicle power supply chain development," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. S, Vignesh & Che, Hang Seng & Selvaraj, Jeyraj & Tey, Kok Soon & Lee, Jia Woon & Shareef, Hussain & Errouissi, Rachid, 2024. "State of Health (SoH) estimation methods for second life lithium-ion battery—Review and challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    15. Zhao, Jingyuan & Wang, Zhenghong & Wu, Yuyan & Burke, Andrew F., 2025. "Predictive pretrained transformer (PPT) for real-time battery health diagnostics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PD).
    16. Jin, Haiyan & Ru, Rui & Cai, Lei & Meng, Jinhao & Wang, Bin & Peng, Jichang & Yang, Shengxiang, 2025. "A synthetic data generation method and evolutionary transformer model for degradation trajectory prediction in lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PD).
    17. Kalghatgi, Gautam, 2018. "Is it really the end of internal combustion engines and petroleum in transport?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 965-974.
    18. Wan, Sicheng & Yang, Haojing & Lin, Jinwen & Li, Junhui & Wang, Yibo & Chen, Xinman, 2024. "Improved whale optimization algorithm towards precise state-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries via optimizing LSTM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    19. Huang, Zhelin & Xu, Fan & Yang, Fangfang, 2023. "State of health prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on autoregression with exogenous variables model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    20. Penelope K. Jones & Ulrich Stimming & Alpha A. Lee, 2022. "Impedance-based forecasting of lithium-ion battery performance amid uneven usage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-49157-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.