IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/emsd88/v12y2023i2p84-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the embodied and operating energy in agricultural greenhouses and in residential buildings

Author

Listed:
  • JOHN VOURDOUBAS

Abstract

The increase of the energy efficiency in buildings and greenhouses is important for reducing the use of fossil fuels and the emissions of greenhouse gases. Energy efficiency evaluation requires the consideration of both the embodied and the operational energy. Many estimations regarding the embodied and the operational energy in various types of buildings have been reported so far. However, studies regarding the embodied energy in agricultural greenhouses are rare while there are many estimations regarding their operational energy. The goal of our study is the comparison of the embodied and the operational energy in residential buildings and in agricultural greenhouses. The embodied and operational energies are compared in greenhouses as well as in low-energy and in conventional residential buildings. Our results indicate that the ratio of embodied energy to life-cycle energy in low-energy residential buildings and in nearly-zero energy buildings varies in the range at 36% to 83% that is significantly higher than the ratio in conventional residential buildings which is in the range of 6% to 20%. The ratio of embodied energy to life-cycle energy in agricultural greenhouses, at 0.86% - 70.41%, varies significantly depending on many parameters. The importance of carbon emissions related to embodied energy in low-energy buildings, in net-zero energy buildings and in agricultural greenhouses is highlighted. Our work could be useful to policy makers who are willing to accelerate the green transition to a low carbon economy in the coming decades.

Suggested Citation

  • John Vourdoubas, 2023. "Comparison of the embodied and operating energy in agricultural greenhouses and in residential buildings," Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(2), pages 84-95, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:emsd88:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:84-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/emsd/article/download/21159/16447
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/emsd/article/view/21159
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Misak Avetisyan & Thomas Hertel & Gregory Sampson, 2014. "Is Local Food More Environmentally Friendly? The GHG Emissions Impacts of Consuming Imported versus Domestically Produced Food," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 58(3), pages 415-462, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kym Anderson, 2021. "Food policy in a more volatile climate and trade environment," Departmental Working Papers 2021-25, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    2. Vita, Gibran & Lundström, Johan R. & Hertwich, Edgar G. & Quist, Jaco & Ivanova, Diana & Stadler, Konstantin & Wood, Richard, 2019. "The Environmental Impact of Green Consumption and Sufficiency Lifestyles Scenarios in Europe: Connecting Local Sustainability Visions to Global Consequences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Enthoven, Laura & Van den Broeck, Goedele, 2021. "Local food systems: Reviewing two decades of research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Azucena Gracia & Miguel I. Gómez, 2020. "Food Sustainability and Waste Reduction in Spain: Consumer Preferences for Local, Suboptimal, And/Or Unwashed Fresh Food Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Lenore Newman & Robert Newell & Colin Dring & Alesandros Glaros & Evan Fraser & Zsofia Mendly-Zambo & Arthur Gill Green & Krishna Bahadur KC, 2023. "Agriculture for the Anthropocene: novel applications of technology and the future of food," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(3), pages 613-627, June.
    6. Jose Nuno-Ledesma & Nelson B. Villoria, 2019. "Estimating International Trade Margins Shares by Mode of Transport for the GTAP Data Base," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 4(1), pages 28-49, June.
    7. Rotem Zelingher & Andrea Ghermandi & Enrica Cian & Malcolm Mistry & Iddo Kan, 2019. "Economic Impacts of Climate Change on Vegetative Agriculture Markets in Israel," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(2), pages 679-696, October.
    8. Castiglione, Concetta & Mazzocchi, Mario, 2019. "Ten years of five-a-day policy in the UK: Nutritional outcomes and environmental effects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 185-194.
    9. Kym Anderson, 2023. "Agriculture's globalization: Endowments, technologies, tastes and policies," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1314-1352, September.
    10. Ariane Voglhuber-Slavinsky & Hartmut Derler & Björn Moller & Ewa Dönitz & Enno Bahrs & Simon Berner, 2021. "Measures to Increase Local Food Supply in the Context of European Framework Scenarios for the Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Anderson, Kym, 2022. "Trade-related food policies in a more volatile climate and trade environment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Gary Goggins, 2018. "Developing a sustainable food strategy for large organizations: The importance of context in shaping procurement and consumption practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 838-848, November.
    13. Jana Schwarz & Monica Schuster & Bernd Annaert & Miet Maertens & Erik Mathijs, 2016. "Sustainability of Global and Local Food Value Chains: An Empirical Comparison of Peruvian and Belgian Asparagus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Tantiwatthanaphanich, Thanapan & Shao, Xuan & Huang, Liqiao & Yoshida, Yoshikuni & Long, Yin, 2022. "Evaluating carbon footprint embodied in Japanese food consumption based on global supply chain," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 56-65.
    15. Kym Anderson, 2022. "Agriculture in a more uncertain global trade environment," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(4), pages 563-579, July.
    16. Du, Kerui & Yu, Ying & Li, Jing, 2020. "Does international trade promote CO2 emission performance? An empirical analysis based on a partially linear functional-coefficient panel data model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Clare Gupta & Tamar Makov, 2017. "How global is my local milk? Evaluating the first-order inputs of “local” milk in Hawai‘i," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(3), pages 619-630, September.
    18. Xu Hartling, 2020. "The Contribution Of Farm Stand, Farmers Market, And Community Supported Agriculture To The Community And Environment," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 14(1), pages 316-328.
    19. Zwart, Tjitske Anna & Mathijs, Erik & Avermaete, Tessa, 2016. "Can Alternative Food Networks contribute to a transition towards sustainability in Flanders: Assessing the marketing functions of Voedselteams," Working Papers 245069, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:emsd88:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:84-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/emsd .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.