IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgt/youmng/v14y2019i2p95-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IFRS 9: Initiator of Changes in Management Accounting Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Mojca Gornjak

    (International School for Social and Business Studies, Slovenia)

Abstract

From 1st of January 2018 all financial and non-financial organizations (except insurance companies), which have financial instruments, such as cash, receivables, debt or equity securities, in the statements of financial positions, had to replace the accounting under IAS 39 with IFRS 9. The replacement changes and has an impact on accounting processes, accounting routines, accounting policies, decision-making, and financial statements. The impact is also on shareholder value. In research on the case study of the Pension Company in Slovenia, we anticipate the changes because of the replacement. The purpose of the article is to present the changes in processes, decision-making, and accounting. Our contribution is to the growing literature on accounting, particularly on the replacement of IAS 39 with IFRS 9 and management accounting. It is important to understand the changes that the replacement brings to the corporate governance of the organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mojca Gornjak, 2019. "IFRS 9: Initiator of Changes in Management Accounting Processes," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 14(2), pages 95-116.
    • Handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:95-116
    DOI: 10.26493/1854-4231.14.95-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hippocampus.si/ISSN/1854-4231/14.95-116.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26493/1854-4231.14.95-116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariannunziata Liguori & Ileana Steccolini, 2012. "Accounting change: explaining the outcomes, interpreting the process," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 27-70, January.
    2. Juhani Vaivio, 2008. "Qualitative management accounting research: rationale, pitfalls and potential," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(1), pages 64-86, March.
    3. Michael Page, 2014. "Business models as a basis for regulation of financial reporting," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(3), pages 683-695, August.
    4. Solomons, David, 1991. "Accounting and social change: A neutralist view," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 287-295.
    5. Onali, Enrico & Ginesti, Gianluca & Ballestra, Luca Vincenzo, 2017. "Investor reaction to IFRS for financial instruments in Europe: The role of firm-specific factors," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 72-77.
    6. George J. Benston & Michael Bromwich & Alfred Wagenhofer, 2006. "Principles‐ versus rules‐based accounting standards: the FASB's standard setting strategy," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 42(2), pages 165-188, June.
    7. Noor Hashim & Weijia Li & John O’Hanlon, 2016. "Expected-loss-based Accounting for Impairment of Financial Instruments: The FASB and IASB Proposals 2009–2016," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 229-267, May.
    8. Ahrens, Thomas & Chapman, Christopher S., 2006. "Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 819-841, November.
    9. Huian Maria Carmen, 2012. "Accounting for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities According to IFRS 9," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 59(1), pages 27-47, July.
    10. Laura Girella & Roberto Tizzano & Elisa Rita Ferrari, 2019. "Concepts travelling across disciplinary fields: the case of the business model," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 373-402, June.
    11. John Burns, 2014. "Qualitative management accounting research inQRAM: some reflections," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 71-81, April.
    12. Benjamin H Cohen & Gerald A. Edwards, Jr., 2017. "The new era of expected credit loss provisioning," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, March.
    13. Mojca Gornjak, 2017. "Comparison of IAS 39 and IFRS 9: The Analysis of Replacement," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 6(1), pages 115-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robalo, Rui, 2014. "Explanations for the gap between management accounting rules and routines: An institutional approach," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 88-97.
    2. Ildiko Orban & Oday Tamimi, 2020. "Accounting Model for Impairment under IFRS 9 and its Impact on Loss Allowance," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1259-1277.
    3. Cooper, Maggie & Nguyen, Quyen T.K., 2019. "Understanding the interaction of motivation and opportunity for tax planning inside US multinationals: A qualitative study," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1-1.
    4. Karen Benson & Peter M Clarkson & Tom Smith & Irene Tutticci, 2015. "A review of accounting research in the Asia Pacific region," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(1), pages 36-88, February.
    5. Goretzki, Lukas & Reuter, Marek & Sandberg, Joanna & Thulin, Gabriella, 2022. "Making sense of employee satisfaction measurement – A technological frames of reference perspective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    6. Teittinen, Henri & Pellinen, Jukka & Järvenpää, Marko, 2013. "ERP in action — Challenges and benefits for management control in SME context," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 278-296.
    7. Parker, Lee D., 2012. "Qualitative management accounting research: Assessing deliverables and relevance," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 54-70.
    8. Puhakka, Hannu, 2017. "The role of accounting in making sense of post-acquisition integration," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 12-22.
    9. Bo Karlsson & Anders Hersinger & Monika Kurkkio, 2019. "Hybrid accountants in the age of the business partner: exploring institutional drivers in a mining company," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 185-211, July.
    10. Mojca Gornjak, 2017. "Comparison of IAS 39 and IFRS 9: The Analysis of Replacement," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 6(1), pages 115-130.
    11. Palermo, Tommaso, 2018. "Accounts of the future: a multiple-case study of scenarios in planning and management control processes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86648, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Lauri Lepistö, 2014. "Taking information technology seriously: on the legitimating discourses of enterprise resource planning system adoption," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 25(3), pages 193-219, December.
    13. Fasshauer, Ingrid, 2012. "Les interactions entre contrôle et stratégie : redéfinition du rôle des cadres intermédiaires et du levier interactif de contrôle," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/11150 edited by Berland, Nicolas.
    14. Marton, Jan & Runesson, Emmeli, 2017. "The predictive ability of loan loss provisions in banks – Effects of accounting standards, enforcement and incentives," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 162-180.
    15. Chua, Wai Fong & Mahama, Habib, 2012. "On theory as a ‘deliverable’ and its relevance in ‘policy’ arenas," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 78-82.
    16. Becker, Sebastian D. & Jagalla, Tobias & Skærbæk, Peter, 2014. "The translation of accrual accounting and budgeting and the reconfiguration of public sector accountants’ identities," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 324-338.
    17. Blackburn, Nivea & Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse & Hooper, Val, 2014. "A dialogical framing of AIS–SEA design," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 83-101.
    18. M. Naresh Kumar & V. Sree Hari Rao, 2015. "A New Methodology for Estimating Internal Credit Risk and Bankruptcy Prediction under Basel II Regime," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 46(1), pages 83-102, June.
    19. Vijaya Murthy & Jim Rooney, 2018. "The Role of Management Accounting in Ancient India: Evidence from the Arthasastra," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 323-341, October.
    20. Mia Kaspersen & Thomas Riise Johansen, 2016. "Changing Social and Environmental Reporting Systems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 731-749, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:95-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkupsi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.