IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A kapitalizmus változatai és az ipar 4.0 a visegrádi országokban
[Varieties of capitalism and industry 4.0 in the Visegrad countries]

Author

Listed:
  • Éltető, Andrea
  • Sass, Magdolna

Abstract

A visegrádi országok gazdaságfejlődési útjának elemzésében a külföldi közvetlentőke- befektetésektől való függést hangsúlyozzák a kapitalista modellek kutatói. Mára kérdésessé vált, hogy vajon fenntartható-e ez a modell. Az elmúlt évtizedben a térségben végbemenő politikai folyamatok is csökkenthetik a térség vonzerejét a külföldi befektetők szemében. A tőkeáramlások általános lassulása és visszaesése is gyengítheti ezen országok függőségét, de az ipar 4.0 elemei meg is erősíthetik azt. Ebben az összefüggésben - üzleti és akadémiai szakértőkkel készített interjúink alapján - az a kép rajzolódik ki, hogy az ipar 4.0 alkalmazása a duális vállalati fejlődést és a külföldi cégektől való függést erősíti. A visegrádiak külföldi tőke hajtotta növekedési modellje kialakítja a külföldi tőke vezérelte ipari átalakulást.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: E02, O25, O33.

Suggested Citation

  • Éltető, Andrea & Sass, Magdolna, 2021. "A kapitalizmus változatai és az ipar 4.0 a visegrádi országokban [Varieties of capitalism and industry 4.0 in the Visegrad countries]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 490-514.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1971
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2021.5.490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1971
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2021.5.490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. , & Stiebale, Joel & Woessner, Nicole, 2020. "Robots and the rise of European superstar firms," CEPR Discussion Papers 15080, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Reinhilde Veugelers, 2019. "Bridging the divide- new evidence about firms and digitalisation," Policy Contributions 33633, Bruegel.
    3. Georg Graetz & Guy Michaels, 2018. "Robots at Work," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 100(5), pages 753-768, December.
    4. Amable, Bruno, 2003. "The Diversity of Modern Capitalism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199261147.
    5. Miklós Szanyi, 2019. "The Balkan model and the balkanization of East Central Europe," IWE Working Papers 258, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    6. Ryszard Rapacki & Juliusz Gardawski & Adam Czerniak & Bozena Horbaczewska & Adam Karbowski & Piotr Maszczyk & Mariusz Prochniak, 2020. "Emerging Varieties of Post-Communist Capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe: Where Do We Stand?," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(4), pages 565-592, April.
    7. Alexandra Bykova & Richard Grieveson & Julia Grübler & Magdolna Sass & Tamás Szemlér, 2021. "Monthly Report No. 2/2021," wiiw Monthly Reports 2021-02, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    8. Takács, Olga & Losonci, Dávid & Demeter, Krisztina, 2019. "Az ipar 4.0 hatásainak nyomában - a magyarországi járműipar elemzése [After the effects of Industry 4.0: an analysis of the Hungarian vehicle industry]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 185-218.
    9. Zoltán Cséfalvay, 2020. "Robotization in Central and Eastern Europe: catching up or dependence?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(8), pages 1534-1553, August.
    10. Andrea Szalavetz, 2020. "Digital transformation – enabling factory economy actors’ entrepreneurial integration in global value chains?," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 771-792, July.
    11. Helmut K. Anheier & Béla Greskovits, 2015. "The Hollowing and Backsliding of Democracy in East Central Europe," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 6, pages 28-37, June.
    12. Bohle, Dorothee & Greskovits, Béla, 2007. "Capitalist diversity in Eastern Europe," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 8(2), pages 3-9.
    13. Naudé, Wim & Surdej, Aleksander & Cameron, Martin, 2019. "The Past and Future of Manufacturing in Central and Eastern Europe: Ready for Industry 4.0?," IZA Discussion Papers 12141, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Sallai, Dorottya & Schnyder, Gerhard, 2018. "The transformation of post-socialist capitalism – from developmental state to clan state?," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 18535, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    15. Keun Lee & Chan-Yuan Wong & Patarapong Intarakumnerd & Chaiyatorn Limapornvanich, 2020. "Is the Fourth Industrial Revolution a window of opportunity for upgrading or reinforcing the middle-income trap? Asian model of development in Southeast Asia," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 408-425, October.
    16. Koen De Backer & Timothy DeStefano & Carlo Menon & Jung Ran Suh, 2018. "Industrial robotics and the global organisation of production," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2018/03, OECD Publishing.
    17. André O Laplume & Bent Petersen & Joshua M Pearce, 2016. "Global value chains from a 3D printing perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 47(5), pages 595-609, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Madari, Zoltán & Hartvig, Áron Dénes & Pap, Áron & Wimmer, Ágnes & Oroszné Csesznák, Anita, 2023. "A digitalizáció hatása a vállalati hozzáadott értékre Magyarországon [The effect of digitalization on corporate added value in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 672-689.
    2. Szunomár, Ágnes & Lima da Frota Araujo, Carlos Raul, 2022. "Kelet-Közép-Európa a digitális selyemúton? Lehetséges politikai gazdaságtani magyarázatok [Central and Eastern Europe on the Digital Silk Road? Possible political economic explanations]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 367-388.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Castellani & Fabio Lamperti & Katiuscia Lavoratori, 2022. "Measuring adoption of industry 4.0 technologies via international trade data: insights from European countries," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(1), pages 51-93, March.
    2. Guendalina Anzolin, 2021. "Automation and its Employment Effects: A Literature Review of Automotive and Garment Sectors," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2021-16, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    5. Dachs, Bernhard & Kinkel, Steffen & Jäger, Angela, 2019. "Bringing it all back home? Backshoring of manufacturing activities and the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1-1.
    6. Timothy DESTEFANO & HANEDA Sho & KWON Hyeog Ug, 2019. "Determinants of Structural Adjustment and Employment Use in Japan: Firm Characteristics, Offshoring and Industrial Robotics," Discussion papers 19067, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    7. Klump, Rainer & Jurkat, Anne & Schneider, Florian, 2021. "Tracking the rise of robots: A survey of the IFR database and its applications," MPRA Paper 107909, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Fan, Haichao & Hu, Yichuan & Tang, Lixin, 2021. "Labor costs and the adoption of robots in China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 608-631.
    9. Antón, José-Ignacio & Fernández-Macías, Enrique & Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf, 2020. "Does Robotization Affect Job Quality? Evidence from European Regional Labour Markets," IZA Discussion Papers 13975, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Davide Dottori, 2021. "Robots and employment: evidence from Italy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(2), pages 739-795, July.
    11. Andrés César & Guillermo Falcone & Pablo Garriga, 2022. "Robots, Exports and Top Income Inequality: Evidence for the U.S," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0307, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    12. Daria A. Starovatova, 2023. "The relationship between robots and labour productivity: Does business scale matter?," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 81-103, April.
    13. Engelbert Stockhammer & Cédric Durand & Ludwig List, 2016. "European growth models and working class restructuring: An International post-Keynesian Political Economy perspective," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(9), pages 1804-1828, September.
    14. Toon Van Overbeke, 2023. "Conflict or cooperation? Exploring the relationship between cooperative institutions and robotisation," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 550-573, September.
    15. Karbowski, Adam, 2019. "Knowledge subsystem," EconStor Preprints 201653, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    16. Haapanala, Henri & Marx, Ive & Parolin, Zachary, 2022. "Robots and Unions: The Moderating Effect of Organised Labour on Technological Unemployment," IZA Discussion Papers 15080, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea & Scicchitano, Sergio & Traverso, Silvio & Tundis, Enrico, 2021. "Stop worrying and love the robot: An activity-based approach to assess the impact of robotization on employment dynamics," GLO Discussion Paper Series 802, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    18. Próchniak Mariusz, 2018. "The Analysis of Institutional Environment in the Area of Product Market Competition in the New EU Member States: What Do the Data Say About the Models of Capitalism Emerging in the CEE Countries?," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 54(4), pages 304-327, December.
    19. Mariusz Prochniak & Magdalena Suska, 2021. "Diversity of Capitalism in Central-Eastern and Western European Countries: Robustness of Results Based on Different Coefficients of Similarity," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 584-595.
    20. Szunomár, Ágnes & Lima da Frota Araujo, Carlos Raul, 2022. "Kelet-Közép-Európa a digitális selyemúton? Lehetséges politikai gazdaságtani magyarázatok [Central and Eastern Europe on the Digital Silk Road? Possible political economic explanations]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 367-388.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E02 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Institutions and the Macroeconomy
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.