Finite Alternating-Move Arbitration Schemes and the Equal Area Solution
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-005-4748-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Bloom, David E & Cavanagh, Christopher L, 1986.
"An Analysis of the Selection of Arbitrators,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(3), pages 408-422, June.
- David E. Bloom & Christopher L. Cavanagh, 1986. "An Analysis of the Selection of Arbitrators," NBER Working Papers 1938, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Nejat Anbarci, 1993. "Noncooperative Foundations of the Area Monotonic Solution," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(1), pages 245-258.
- Anbarci, Nejat & Bigelow, John P., 1994. "The area monotonic solution to the cooperative bargaining problem," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 133-142, October.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Fabio Galeotti & Maria Montero & Anders Poulsen, 2022.
"The Attraction and Compromise Effects in Bargaining: Experimental Evidence,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2987-3007, April.
- Fabio Galeotti & Maria Montero & Anders Poulsen, 2017. "The attraction and compromise effects in bargaining: Experimental evidence," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 17-04, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
- Fabio Galeotti & Maria Montero & Anders Poulsen, 2022. "The Attraction and Compromise Effects in Bargaining: Experimental Evidence," Post-Print hal-03514435, HAL.
- Fabio Galeotti & Maria Montero & Anders Poulsen, 2018. "The Attraction and Compromise Effects in Bargaining: Experimental Evidence," Post-Print halshs-01820223, HAL.
- Fabio Galeotti, 2017. "The Attraction and Compromise Effects in Bargaining: Experimental Evidence," Post-Print halshs-01657317, HAL.
- Fabio Galeotti & Maria Montero & Anders Poulsen, 2020. "The Attraction and Compromise Effects in Bargaining: Experimental Evidence," Working Papers halshs-02466032, HAL.
- Matías Núñez & M. Remzi Sanver, 2021.
"On the subgame perfect implementability of voting rules,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(2), pages 421-441, February.
- Matias Nunez & M. Remzi Sanver, 2020. "On the subgame perfect implementability of voting rules," Post-Print hal-03092402, HAL.
- Laslier, Jean-François & Núñez, Matías & Remzi Sanver, M., 2021.
"A solution to the two-person implementation problem,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
- Jean-François Laslier & Matias Nunez & M Remzi Sanver, 2020. "A solution to the two-person implementation problem," PSE Working Papers halshs-02173504, HAL.
- Jean-François Laslier & Matias Nunez & M. Remzi Sanver, 2021. "A solution to the two-person implementation problem," Post-Print hal-03498370, HAL.
- Jean-François Laslier & Matías Núñez & M. Remzi Sanver, 2021. "A solution to the two-person implementation problem," Post-Print halshs-03342559, HAL.
- Jean-François Laslier & Matías Núñez & M. Remzi Sanver, 2021. "A solution to the two-person implementation problem," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-03342559, HAL.
- Jean-François Laslier & Matias Nunez & M Remzi Sanver, 2020. "A solution to the two-person implementation problem," Working Papers halshs-02173504, HAL.
- Núñez, Matías & Laslier, Jean-François, 2015.
"Bargaining through Approval,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 63-73.
- Matias Nunez & Jean-Francois Laslier, 2014. "Bargaining through Approval," THEMA Working Papers 2014-06, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
- Matias Nunez & Jean-François Laslier, 2015. "Bargaining through Approval," Post-Print halshs-01310223, HAL.
- Matias Nunez & Jean-François Laslier, 2015. "Bargaining through Approval," PSE Working Papers halshs-01168675, HAL.
- Matias Nunez & Jean-François Laslier, 2015. "Bargaining through Approval," Working Papers halshs-01168675, HAL.
- Salvador Barberà & Danilo Coelho, 2024. "Mechanisms to Appoint Arbitrator Panels or Sets of Judges by Compromise Between Concerned Parties," Working Papers 1442, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Roberto Serrano, 2021.
"Sixty-seven years of the Nash program: time for retirement?,"
SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 12(1), pages 35-48, March.
- Roberto Serrano, 2020. "Sixty-Seven Years of the Nash Program: Time for Retirement?," Working Papers 2020-20, Brown University, Department of Economics.
- Zak, F., 2014. "Psychological Games in the Theory of Choice. II. Shame, Regret, Egoism and Altruism," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 12-40.
- Matias Nunez & M. Remzi Sanver, 2021. "On the subgame perfect implementability of voting rules," Post-Print hal-03341697, HAL.
- Damien Bol & Jean-François Laslier & Matías Núñez, 2022. "Two Person Bargaining Mechanisms: A Laboratory Experiment," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1145-1177, December.
- Salvador Barberà & Danilo Coelho, 2022.
"Compromising on compromise rules,"
RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(1), pages 95-112, March.
- Salvador Barberà & Danilo Coelho, 2021. "Compromising on Compromise Rules," Working Papers 1263, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Meir, Reshef & Kalai, Gil & Tennenholtz, Moshe, 2018. "Bidding games and efficient allocations," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 166-193.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Yakov Babichenko & Leonard J. Schulman, 2015. "Pareto Efficient Nash Implementation Via Approval Voting," Papers 1502.05238, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2017.
- Mustafa Oguz Afacan & Nejat Anbarci & Ozgur Kıbrıs, 2022. "Arbiter Assignment," Department of Economics Working Papers 2022_02, Durham University, Department of Economics.
- Nejat Anbarci & Ching-jen Sun, 2011. "Distributive justice and the Nash bargaining solution," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 37(3), pages 453-470, September.
- Bogomolnaia, Anna & Holzman, Ron & Moulin, Hervé, 2023. "On guarantees, vetoes and random dictators," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(1), January.
- Anna bogomolnaia Ron Holzman Herve Moulin, 2021. "Wost Case in Voting and Bargaining," Papers 2104.02316, arXiv.org.
- Anna Bogomolnaia & Ron Holzman & Hervé Moulin, 2021.
"Worst Case in Voting and Bargaining,"
Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers)
halshs-03196999, HAL.
- Anna Bogomolnaia & Ron Holzman & Hervé Moulin, 2021. "Worst Case in Voting and Bargaining," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 21012, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
- Anna Bogomolnaia & Ron Holzman & Hervé Moulin, 2021. "Worst Case in Voting and Bargaining," Post-Print halshs-03196999, HAL.
- Nejat Anbarci, 1998. "Simple Characterizations of the Nash and Kalai/smorodinsky Solutions," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 255-261, December.
- Salvador Barberà & Danilo Coelho, 2022.
"Compromising on compromise rules,"
RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(1), pages 95-112, March.
- Salvador Barberà & Danilo Coelho, 2021. "Compromising on Compromise Rules," Working Papers 1263, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Younghwan In, 2008. "On the relevance of alternatives in bargaining: generalized average pay-off solutions," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 37(2), pages 251-264, June.
- John Conley & Simon Wilkie, 2012. "The ordinal egalitarian bargaining solution for finite choice sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(1), pages 23-42, January.
- Anbarci, Nejat & Boyd III, John H., 2011.
"Nash demand game and the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 14-22, January.
- Anbarci, Nejat & Boyd III, John H., 2008. "Nash demand game and the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution," Working Papers eco_2008_11, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
- William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.
- Rachmilevitch, Shiran, "undated". "Gradual Negotiations and Proportional Solutions," Working Papers WP2011/8, University of Haifa, Department of Economics.
- Benson Bruce L., 2000.
"Jurisdictional Choice in International Trade: Implications for Lex Cybernatoria,"
Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 3-32, March.
- Benson Bruce L., 2000. "Jurisdictional Choice in International Trade: Implications for Lex Cybernatoria," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-32, March.
- Thomas Mayer, 2012. "Ziliak and McCloskey's Criticisms of Significance Tests: An Assessment," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 9(3), pages 256-297, September.
- Julian Donaubauer & Eric Neumayer & Peter Nunnenkamp, 2018.
"Winning or losing in investor‐to‐state dispute resolution: The role of arbitrator bias and experience,"
Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 892-916, September.
- Donaubauer, Julian & Neumayer, Eric & Nunnenkamp, Peter, 2017. "Winning or losing in investor-to-state dispute resolution: The role of arbitrator bias and experience," Kiel Working Papers 2074, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
- Donaubauer, Julian & Neumayer, Eric & Nunnenkamp, Peter, 2018. "Winning or losing in investor-to-state dispute resolution: the role of arbitrator bias and experience," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87256, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Kapeller, Jakob & Steinerberger, Stefan, 2017.
"Stability, fairness and random walks in the bargaining problem,"
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 488(C), pages 60-71.
- Jakob Kapeller & Stefan Steinerberger, 2017. "Stability, Fairness and Random Walks in the Bargaining Problem," Economics working papers 2017-16, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
- Jakob Kapeller & Stefan Steinerberger, 2017. "Stability, Fairness and Random Walks in the Bargaining Problem," ICAE Working Papers 67, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
- Jaume García Segarra & Miguel Ginés Vilar, 2011. "Weighted Proportional Losses Solution," ThE Papers 10/21, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
- Ismail Saglam, 2013.
"Endogenously proportional bargaining solutions,"
Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(2), pages 1521-1534.
- Ismail Saglam, 2012. "Endogenously Proportional Bargaining Solutions," Koç University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum Working Papers 1232, Koc University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum.
- Saglam, Ismail, 2012. "Endogenously Proportional Bargaining Solutions," MPRA Paper 42386, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Claudio Detotto & Riccardo Marselli & Bryan C. McCannon & Marco Vannini, 2024.
"Experts and arbitration outcomes: Insights from public procurement contract disputes,"
Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(4), pages 922-943, November.
- M. Vannini & B. Mccannon & R. Marselli & C. Detotto, 2022. "Experts and Arbitration Outcomes: Insights from Public Procurement Contract Disputes," Working Paper CRENoS 202204, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
More about this item
Keywords
The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS); the Alternate Strike (AS) scheme; the Voting by Alternating Offers and Vetoes (VAOV) scheme; the Enhancing Past Concessions scheme; the Honoring Past Concessions scheme; the Equal Area solution;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:61:y:2006:i:1:p:21-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.