IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v22y2022i3d10.1007_s11115-021-00538-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Telework in a Federal Agency at the Operational Phase

Author

Listed:
  • Richard W. Monroe

    (North Carolina A&T State University)

  • James C. Haug

    (Longwood University)

Abstract

Telework as an optional work arrangement has gained significant popularity over the last few decades in organizations of all kinds. Private businesses and public agencies have found telework to be valuable for increasing work capacity while many employees regard telework as an attractive benefit when it is available. Telework provides greater schedule flexibility for employees, an alternative that maintains productivity during weather emergencies, and provides the opportunity for better work-life balance for employees. This paper describes an assessment of attitudes about telework in a federal agency. The impact of telework on agency mission and employee attitudes about related aspects of telework are assessed. The assessment is conducted through an online questionnaire administered to the entire workforce at one specific federal agency location. Issues addressed include teleworker accountability, teamwork, independent work and telework as an employee benefit. Overall, the results indicate mainly positive attitudes about telework, the agency mission and the work environment throughout the agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard W. Monroe & James C. Haug, 2022. "Assessment of Telework in a Federal Agency at the Operational Phase," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 725-742, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:22:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11115-021-00538-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-021-00538-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11115-021-00538-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11115-021-00538-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    2. Nabila Jawadi & Mohamed Daassi & Marc Favier & Michel Kalika, 2013. "Relationship building in virtual teams: A leadership behavioral complexity perspective," Post-Print hal-03523628, HAL.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12838 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Alladi Venkatesh & Nicholas P. Vitalari, 1992. "An Emerging Distributed Work Arrangement: An Investigation of Computer-Based Supplemental Work at Home," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(12), pages 1687-1706, December.
    5. James Gerard Caillier, 2016. "Do Teleworkers Possess Higher Levels of Public Service Motivation?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 461-476, December.
    6. M. Favier & Mohamed Daassi & N. Jawadi, 2013. "Relationship building in virtual teams: A leadership behavioral complexity perspective," Post-Print halshs-01066691, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Suresh & Kavya Gopakumar, 2021. "Multi-grade fuzzy assessment framework for software professionals in work-from-home mode during and post-COVID-19 era," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Jihad FRAIJ & Nemer ABURUMMAN, 2021. "How Does Telework Act As A Solution To The Public Sector In The Time Of Pandemic?," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 13-24, June.
    3. Maciej Bukowski & Grzegorz Koloch & Piotr Lewandowski & Anna Baranowska & Iga Magda & Arkadiusz Szydlowski & Jacek Bielinski & Magdalena Bober & Malgorzata Sarzalska & Julian Zawistowski, 2008. "Employment in Poland 2007. Security on a Flexible Labour Market," Books and Reports published by IBS, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych, number zwp2007 edited by Maciej Bukowski, january.
    4. Song Gu & Lan Xue, 2022. "Relationships among Sports Group Cohesion, Psychological Collectivism, Mental Toughness and Athlete Engagement in Chinese Team Sports Athletes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-14, April.
    5. France Belanger & Rosann Webb Collins & Paul H. Cheney, 2001. "Technology Requirements and Work Group Communication for Telecommuters," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 155-176, June.
    6. Michael Beckmann & Thomas Cornelissen, 2014. "Self-Managed Working Time and Employee Effort: Microeconometric Evidence," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 636, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    7. Sumita Raghuram & Philipp Tuertscher & Raghu Garud, 2010. "Research Note ---Mapping the Field of Virtual Work: A Cocitation Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 983-999, December.
    8. Rüttgers, Christian & Hochgürtel, Katharina, 2017. "New Work(ing Time): Was bedeutet die Digitalisierung der Arbeit für das Personalmanagement? Eine empirische Analyse der Einstellungen von Beschäftigten," ipo Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ipo Institut für Personal- & Organisationsforschung, volume 1, number 1 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, IPO Institut für Personal- & Organisationsforschung, March.
    9. Bayarma Alexander & Martin Dijst & Dick Ettema, 2010. "Working from 9 to 6? An analysis of in-home and out-of-home working schedules," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 505-523, May.
    10. Kelly Y. Senter & Austin McClelland, Sr., 2015. "Top Ten Workplace Skills for Future Organizations," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 6(2), pages 20-32, August.
    11. Susan A. Brown, 2008. "Household technology adoption, use, and impacts: Past, present, and future," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 397-402, September.
    12. Thomas A. O’Neill & Samantha E. Hancock & Katarina Zivkov & Nicole L. Larson & Stephanie J. Law, 2016. "Team Decision Making in Virtual and Face-to-Face Environments," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 995-1020, September.
    13. Se-Joon Hong & Kar Yan Tam, 2006. "Understanding the Adoption of Multipurpose Information Appliances: The Case of Mobile Data Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 162-179, June.
    14. Filomena Almeida & Helena Rodrigues & Patrícia Freitas, 2024. "“No Need to Dress to Impress” Evidence on Teleworking during and after the Pandemic: A Systematic Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-34, April.
    15. Nancy B. Kurland & Terri D. Egan, 1999. "Telecommuting: Justice and Control in the Virtual Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 500-513, August.
    16. Brewer, Ann M., 1998. "Work design, flexible work arrangements and travel behaviour: policy implications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 93-101, April.
    17. Albert Kampermann & Raymond Opdenakker & Beatrice Van der Heijden & Joost Bücker, 2021. "Intercultural Competencies for Fostering Technology-Mediated Collaboration in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:22:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11115-021-00538-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.