IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v27y2016i4d10.1007_s11002-015-9379-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of category label specificity on consumer choice

Author

Listed:
  • Hee Jin Kim

    (Korea University)

  • Song Oh Yoon

    (Korea University)

Abstract

The current research demonstrates the category specificity effect, whereby an individual’s choice of options belonging to different categories depends on whether the options are categorized in a specific or abstract manner. In particular, when categories do not contain labels that specifically convey category knowledge, individuals tend to view the assortment as having more varied alternatives, leading to greater variety-seeking. Three laboratory studies employing the context of food menu selections were conducted to test our hypotheses. Study 1 and Study 2 reveal that, given the identical assortment of dishes, individuals are likely to order a greater variety of dishes when the menu contains no category labels or abstract category labels, as opposed to when it contains specific category labels. Furthermore, the use of abstract category labels increases the number of dishes individuals order. We further show that this category specificity effect on choice is mediated by the enhanced perception of variety offered in the menu. Study 3 demonstrates that the effect of category specificity is moderated by an individual’s familiarity with the food category.

Suggested Citation

  • Hee Jin Kim & Song Oh Yoon, 2016. "The effect of category label specificity on consumer choice," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 765-777, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:27:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11002-015-9379-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-015-9379-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-015-9379-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-015-9379-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diehl, Kristin & Kornish, Laura J & Lynch, John G, Jr, 2003. "Smart Agents: When Lower Search Costs for Quality Information Increase Price Sensitivity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(1), pages 56-71, June.
    2. Kahn, Barbara E & Isen, Alice M, 1993. "The Influence of Positive Affect on Variety Seeking among Safe, Enjoyable Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(2), pages 257-270, September.
    3. Ratner, Rebecca K & Kahn, Barbara E, 2002. "The Impact of Private versus Public Consumption on Variety-Seeking Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(2), pages 246-257, September.
    4. Johnson, Michael D, 1984. "Consumer Choice Strategies for Comparing Noncomparable Alternatives," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(3), pages 741-753, December.
    5. Ratneshwar, S & Pechmann, Cornelia & Shocker, Allan D, 1996. "Goal-Derived Categories and the Antecedents of Across-Category Consideration," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 23(3), pages 240-250, December.
    6. Joseph P. Redden, 2008. "Reducing Satiation: The Role of Categorization Level," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(5), pages 624-634, August.
    7. Cassie Mogilner & Tamar Rudnick & Sheena S. Iyengar, 2008. "The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers' Perceptions of Assortment Variety and Outcome Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(2), pages 202-215, June.
    8. Simonson, Itamar & Winer, Russell S, 1992. "The Influence of Purchase Quantity and Display Format on Consumer Preference for Variety," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(1), pages 133-138, June.
    9. Kahn, Barbara E & Wansink, Brian, 2004. "The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(4), pages 519-533, March.
    10. Sujan, Mita, 1985. "Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(1), pages 31-46, June.
    11. Bettman, James R & Luce, Mary Frances & Payne, John W, 1998. "Constructive Consumer Choice Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(3), pages 187-217, December.
    12. Cassie Mogilner & Tamar Rudnick & Sheena Iyengar, 2008. "The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers' Perceptions of Assortment Variety," Economics Working Papers 0070, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mejía, Victor D. & Aurier, Philippe & Huaman-Ramirez, Richard, 2021. "Disentangling the respective impacts of assortment size and alignability on perceived assortment variety," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Wang, Yan & Jiang, Jing & Yang, Ying, 2023. "Magic odd numbers: The effect of numerical parity on variety-seeking," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spassova, Gerri & Isen, Alice M., 2013. "Positive affect moderates the impact of assortment size on choice satisfaction," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(4), pages 397-408.
    2. Wang, Xia & Sun, Luping & Keh, Hean Tat, 2013. "Consumer responses to variety in product bundles: The moderating role of evaluation mode," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 335-342.
    3. Wu, Pei-Hsun & Kao, Danny Tengti, 2011. "Goal orientation and variety seeking behavior: The role of decision task," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 65-72, February.
    4. Gabriele Pizzi & Gian Luca Marzocchi, 2020. "Consumer-defined assortments: application of card-sorting to category management," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(1), pages 67-84, March.
    5. Ghiassaleh, Arezou & Kocher, Bruno & Czellar, Sandor, 2024. "The effects of benefit-based (vs. attribute-based) product categorizations on mental imagery and purchase behavior," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 239-255.
    6. Liane Nagengast & Christina Heidemann & Thomas Rudolph, 2013. "Der kombinierte Einsatz von Sortimentsreduktion und Regalkategorisierung zur Sortimentsoptimierung–," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(7), pages 666-687, December.
    7. Mohan, Geetha & Sivakumaran, Bharadhwaj & Sharma, Piyush, 2012. "Store environment's impact on variety seeking behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 419-428.
    8. Jordan Etkin & Cassie Mogilner, 2016. "Does Variety Among Activities Increase Happiness?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 210-229.
    9. Langner, Tobias & Krengel, Martin, 2013. "The mere categorization effect for complex products: The moderating role of expertise and affect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 924-932.
    10. Wen, Na & Lurie, Nicholas H., 2019. "More Than Aesthetic: Visual Boundaries and Perceived Variety," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 86-98.
    11. Ali Besharat & Gia Nardini & Rhiannon MacDonnell Mesler, 2024. "Bringing Ethical Consumption to the Forefront in Emerging Markets: The Role of Product Categorization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(4), pages 777-792, May.
    12. Pan Li & Alexander Tuzhilin, 2024. "When Variety Seeking Meets Unexpectedness: Incorporating Variety-Seeking Behaviors into Design of Unexpected Recommender Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1257-1273, September.
    13. Frank Goedertier & Kristof Geskens & Maggie Geuens & Bert Weijters, 2012. "Increasing choice satisfaction through goal-based labeling," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 119-136, March.
    14. Liu, Pengcheng & Xie, Qing & You, Yi & Dong, Qingqing, 2024. "A Study of Choice Overload Measurement in Food Consumption," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344272, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    15. Javornik, Ana & Marder, Ben & Pizzetti, Marta & Warlop, Luk, 2021. "Augmented self - The effects of virtual face augmentation on consumers' self-concept," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 170-187.
    16. Kahn, Barbara E., 2017. "Using Visual Design to Improve Customer Perceptions of Online Assortments," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 29-42.
    17. Liang Huang & Rafay A. Siddiqui & Anastasiya Pocheptsova Ghosh, 2024. "More of the same: Painful payment methods decrease variety seeking," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 533-545, December.
    18. Kim, Jungkeun, 2020. "Impact of the perceived threat of COVID-19 on variety-seeking," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 108-116.
    19. Piccoli, Gabriele & Lui, Tsz-Wai & Grün, Bettina, 2017. "The impact of IT-enabled customer service systems on service personalization, customer service perceptions, and hotel performance," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 349-362.
    20. Roose, Gudrun & Vermeir, Iris, 2023. "Putting spatial product presentation cues on the map: Review and research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:27:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11002-015-9379-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.