IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v65y2013i7d10.1007_bf03372888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Der kombinierte Einsatz von Sortimentsreduktion und Regalkategorisierung zur Sortimentsoptimierung–

Author

Listed:
  • Liane Nagengast

    (Universität St.Gallen)

  • Christina Heidemann

    (Universität St.Gallen)

  • Thomas Rudolph

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Konsumenten verlangen nach einem effizienten Einkaufsprozess und wollen schnell und unkompliziert zu ihrem Wunschprodukt gelangen. Handel und Hersteller können dabei durch übersichtliche Sortimente Unterstützung leisten. Die Übersichtlichkeit umfasst zwei Aspekte: (1) die tatsächliche Größe und (2) die Präsentation des Sortiments. Der vorliegende Artikel untersucht die Auswirkungen des kombinierten Einsatzes von Sortimentsreduktion und visueller Gliederung des Regals (Regalkategorisierung) auf das Kaufverhalten am Point of Sale. Die Ergebnisse im realen Marktumfeld zeigen, dass sowohl eine Sortimentsreduktion als auch eine Regalkategorisierung Konsumenten den Auswahlprozess erleichtern. Während die Suchzeit signifikant sinkt, bleibt die Kaufabschlussrate konstant. Zudem bewirken beide Instrumente Effizienzverbesserungen auf Handelsseite durch eine Beschleunigung der in-store Prozesse.

Suggested Citation

  • Liane Nagengast & Christina Heidemann & Thomas Rudolph, 2013. "Der kombinierte Einsatz von Sortimentsreduktion und Regalkategorisierung zur Sortimentsoptimierung–," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(7), pages 666-687, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:65:y:2013:i:7:d:10.1007_bf03372888
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03372888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03372888
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03372888?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shugan, Steven M, 1980. "The Cost of Thinking," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(2), pages 99-111, Se.
    2. Cassie Mogilner & Tamar Rudnick & Sheena S. Iyengar, 2008. "The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers' Perceptions of Assortment Variety and Outcome Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(2), pages 202-215, June.
    3. Boyd, D. Eric & Bahn, Kenneth D., 2009. "When Do Large Product Assortments Benefit Consumers? An Information-Processing Perspective," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 288-297.
    4. Mantrala, Murali K. & Levy, Michael & Kahn, Barbara E. & Fox, Edward J. & Gaidarev, Peter & Dankworth, Bill & Shah, Denish, 2009. "Why is Assortment Planning so Difficult for Retailers? A Framework and Research Agenda," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 71-83.
    5. William J. Baumol & Edward A. Ide, 1956. "Variety in Retailing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 93-101, October.
    6. Garrett van Ryzin & Siddharth Mahajan, 1999. "On the Relationship Between Inventory Costs and Variety Benefits in Retail Assortments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(11), pages 1496-1509, November.
    7. John T. Gourville & Dilip Soman, 2005. "Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 382-395, July.
    8. Sloot, Laurens M. & Verhoef, Peter C., 2008. "The Impact of Brand Delisting on Store Switching and Brand Switching Intentions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 281-296.
    9. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Tybout, Alice M, 1989. "Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(1), pages 39-54, June.
    10. Diehl, Kristin & Kornish, Laura J & Lynch, John G, Jr, 2003. "Smart Agents: When Lower Search Costs for Quality Information Increase Price Sensitivity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(1), pages 56-71, June.
    11. Kahn, Barbara E & Wansink, Brian, 2004. "The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(4), pages 519-533, March.
    12. Chakravarti, Amitav & Janiszewski, Chris, 2003. "The Influence of Macro-level Motives on Consideration Set Composition in Novel Purchase Situations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 244-258, September.
    13. Martin Natter & Thomas Reutterer & Andreas Mild & Alfred Taudes, 2007. "—An Assortmentwide Decision-Support System for Dynamic Pricing and Promotion Planning in DIY Retailing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 576-583, 07-08.
    14. Sharad Borle & Peter Boatwright & Joseph B. Kadane & Joseph C. Nunes & Shmueli Galit, 2005. "The Effect of Product Assortment Changes on Customer Retention," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 616-622, July.
    15. Holbrook, Morris B & Moore, William L, 1981. "Feature Interactions in Consumer Judgments of Verbal versus Pictorial Presentations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 8(1), pages 103-113, June.
    16. Cassie Mogilner & Tamar Rudnick & Sheena Iyengar, 2008. "The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers' Perceptions of Assortment Variety," Economics Working Papers 0070, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan, Huan & Chang, En-Chung & Chou, Ting-Jui & Tang, Xiaofei, 2015. "The over-categorization effect: How the number of categorizations influences shoppers' perceptions of variety and satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 631-638.
    2. Lee, Ha Kyung & Choo, Ho Jung, 2019. "Birds of a feather flocked together look abundant: The visual gestalt effect of an assortment presentation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 170-182.
    3. Spassova, Gerri & Isen, Alice M., 2013. "Positive affect moderates the impact of assortment size on choice satisfaction," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(4), pages 397-408.
    4. Pizzi, Gabriele & Scarpi, Daniele, 2016. "The effect of shelf layout on satisfaction and perceived assortment size: An empirical assessment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 67-77.
    5. Diehl, Kristin & van Herpen, Erica & Lamberton, Cait, 2015. "Organizing Products with Complements versus Substitutes: Effects on Store Preferences as a Function of Effort and Assortment Perceptions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 1-18.
    6. Hense, Jonas & Hübner, Alexander, 2022. "Assortment optimization in omni-channel retailing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 124-140.
    7. Claire Heeryung Kim & Joonkyung Kim, 2021. "The Role of Cause Involvement and Assortment Size on Decision Difficulty via Communal Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Hee Jin Kim & Song Oh Yoon, 2016. "The effect of category label specificity on consumer choice," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 765-777, December.
    9. Beneke, Justin & Cumming, Alice & Jolly, Lindsey, 2013. "The effect of item reduction on assortment satisfaction—A consideration of the category of red wine in a controlled retail setting," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 282-291.
    10. Gabriele Pizzi & Gian Luca Marzocchi, 2020. "Consumer-defined assortments: application of card-sorting to category management," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(1), pages 67-84, March.
    11. Chang, Chingching, 2011. "The Effect of the Number of Product Subcategories on Perceived Variety and Shopping Experience in an Online Store," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 159-168.
    12. Frank Goedertier & Kristof Geskens & Maggie Geuens & Bert Weijters, 2012. "Increasing choice satisfaction through goal-based labeling," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 119-136, March.
    13. Barbara Kahn & Alexander Chernev & Ulf Böckenholt & Kate Bundorf & Michaela Draganska & Ryan Hamilton & Robert Meyer & Klaus Wertenbroch, 2014. "Consumer and managerial goals in assortment choice and design," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 293-303, September.
    14. Sethuraman, Raj & Gázquez-Abad, Juan Carlos & Martínez-López, Francisco J., 2022. "The effect of retail assortment size on perceptions, choice, and sales: Review and research directions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 24-45.
    15. Kahn, Barbara E., 2017. "Using Visual Design to Improve Customer Perceptions of Online Assortments," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 29-42.
    16. Miller, Christopher M. & Smith, Stephen A. & McIntyre, Shelby H. & Achabal, Dale D., 2010. "Optimizing and Evaluating Retail Assortments for Infrequently Purchased Products," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 159-171.
    17. Mejía, Victor D. & Aurier, Philippe & Huaman-Ramirez, Richard, 2021. "Disentangling the respective impacts of assortment size and alignability on perceived assortment variety," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    18. Bauer, Johannes C. & Kotouc, Alexander J. & Rudolph, Thomas, 2012. "What constitutes a “good assortment†? A scale for measuring consumers' perceptions of an assortment offered in a grocery category," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 11-26.
    19. Jonah Berger & Michaela Draganska & Itamar Simonson, 2007. "The Influence of Product Variety on Brand Perception and Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 460-472, 07-08.
    20. Qin, Dan, 2024. "A simple model of two-stage choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    M31;

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:65:y:2013:i:7:d:10.1007_bf03372888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.