IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v27y2016i4d10.1007_s11002-015-9375-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response style corrected market segmentation for ordinal data

Author

Listed:
  • Bettina Grün

    (Johannes Kepler University Linz)

  • Sara Dolnicar

    (University of Queensland, St Lucia)

Abstract

Survey data collected for market segmentation studies is typically ordinal in nature. As such, it is susceptible to response styles. Ignoring response styles can lead to market segments which do not differ in beliefs, but merely in how segment members use survey answer options and which possibly occur in addition to the belief segments. We propose a finite mixture model which simultaneously segments and corrects for response styles, permits heterogeneity in both beliefs and response styles, accommodates a range of different response styles, does not impose a certain relationship between the response style and belief segments, and is suitable for ordinal data. The performance of the model is tested using both artificial and empirical survey data.

Suggested Citation

  • Bettina Grün & Sara Dolnicar, 2016. "Response style corrected market segmentation for ordinal data," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 729-741, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:27:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11002-015-9375-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-015-9375-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-015-9375-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-015-9375-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Wedel, 2002. "Concomitant variables in finite mixture models," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 56(3), pages 362-375, August.
    2. Timothy Johnson, 2003. "On the use of heterogeneous thresholds ordinal regression models to account for individual differences in response style," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 563-583, December.
    3. Christian Hennig & Tim F. Liao, 2013. "How to find an appropriate clustering for mixed-type variables with application to socio-economic stratification," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(3), pages 309-369, May.
    4. Rossi P. E & Gilula Z. & Allenby G. M, 2001. "Overcoming Scale Usage Heterogeneity: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 20-31, March.
    5. Fraley C. & Raftery A.E., 2002. "Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 611-631, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raoofpanah, Iman & Zamudio, César & Groening, Christopher, 2023. "Review reader segmentation based on the heterogeneous impacts of review and reviewer attributes on review helpfulness: A study involving ZIP code data," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salvatore Ingrassia & Antonio Punzo & Giorgio Vittadini & Simona Minotti, 2015. "Erratum to: The Generalized Linear Mixed Cluster-Weighted Model," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 32(2), pages 327-355, July.
    2. Lynd Bacon & Peter Lenk, 2012. "Augmenting discrete-choice data to identify common preference scales for inter-subject analyses," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 453-474, December.
    3. Anne Thissen-Roe & David Thissen, 2013. "A Two-Decision Model for Responses to Likert-Type Items," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 38(5), pages 522-547, October.
    4. Nino Hardt & Alex Varbanov & Greg M. Allenby, 2016. "Monetizing Ratings Data for Product Research," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 713-726, September.
    5. Salvatore Ingrassia & Antonio Punzo & Giorgio Vittadini & Simona Minotti, 2015. "The Generalized Linear Mixed Cluster-Weighted Model," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 32(1), pages 85-113, April.
    6. Kim, Jung Seek & Ratchford, Brian T., 2013. "A Bayesian multivariate probit for ordinal data with semiparametric random-effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 192-208.
    7. de Jong, M.G., 2006. "Response bias in international marketing research," Other publications TiSEM 5d4031be-97b5-4db3-962b-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Utkarsh J. Dang & Antonio Punzo & Paul D. McNicholas & Salvatore Ingrassia & Ryan P. Browne, 2017. "Multivariate Response and Parsimony for Gaussian Cluster-Weighted Models," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 34(1), pages 4-34, April.
    9. Abby Flynt & Nema Dean, 2016. "A Survey of Popular R Packages for Cluster Analysis," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(2), pages 205-225, April.
    10. Roberto Colombi & Sabrina Giordano & Gerhard Tutz, 2021. "A Rating Scale Mixture Model to Account for the Tendency to Middle and Extreme Categories," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(6), pages 682-716, December.
    11. Dirk Lubbe & Christof Schuster, 2020. "A Scaled Threshold Model for Measuring Extreme Response Style," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(1), pages 86-107, February.
    12. Maria Iannario, 2015. "Detecting latent components in ordinal data with overdispersion by means of a mixture distribution," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 977-987, May.
    13. William H. Greene & Mark N. Harris & Rachel J. Knott & Nigel Rice, 2021. "Specification and testing of hierarchical ordered response models with anchoring vignettes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(1), pages 31-64, January.
    14. Pourahmadi, Mohsen & Daniels, Michael J. & Park, Trevor, 2007. "Simultaneous modelling of the Cholesky decomposition of several covariance matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 568-587, March.
    15. Stefano Tonellato & Andrea Pastore, 2013. "On the comparison of model-based clustering solutions," Working Papers 2013:05, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    16. Elvira Pelle & Roberta Pappadà, 2021. "A clustering procedure for mixed-type data to explore ego network typologies: an application to elderly people living alone in Italy," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(5), pages 1507-1533, December.
    17. Scrucca, Luca, 2011. "Model-based SIR for dimension reduction," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 3010-3026, November.
    18. Nalan Basturk & Richard Paap & Dick van Dijk, 2008. "Structural Differences in Economic Growth," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-085/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Wang, Luming & Finn, Adam, 2014. "A psychometric theory that measures up to marketing reality: An adapted Many Faceted IRT model," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 93-102.
    20. Sha Yang & Yi Zhao & Ravi Dhar, 2010. "Modeling the Underreporting Bias in Panel Survey Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 525-539, 05-06.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:27:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11002-015-9375-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.