IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jgeosy/v25y2023i4d10.1007_s10109-023-00414-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Activity triangles: a new approach to measure activity spaces

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Sila-Nowicka

    (the University of Auckland
    University of Glasgow
    Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences)

  • A. Stewart Fotheringham

    (Arizona State University)

  • Urška Demšar

    (University of St Andrews)

Abstract

There is an on-going challenge to describe, analyse and visualise the actual and potential extent of human spatial behaviour. The concept of an activity space has been used to examine how people interact with their environment and how the actual or potential spatial extent of individual spatial behaviour can be defined. In this paper, we introduce a new method for measuring activity spaces. We first focus on the definitions and the applications of activity space measures, identifying their respective limitations. We then present our new method, which is based on the theoretical concept of significant locations, that is, places where people spent most of their time. We identify locations of significant places from GPS trajectories and define the activity space of an individual as a set of the first three significant places forming a so-called “activity triangle”. Our new method links the distances travelled for different activities to whether or not people group their activities, which is not possible using existing methods of measuring activity spaces. We test our method on data from a GPS-based travel survey across three towns is Scotland and look at the variations in size and shape of the designed activity triangle among people of different age and gender. We also compare our activity triangle with five other activity spaces and conclude by providing possible routes for improvement of activity space measures when using real human movement data (GPS data).

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Sila-Nowicka & A. Stewart Fotheringham & Urška Demšar, 2023. "Activity triangles: a new approach to measure activity spaces," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 489-517, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:25:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10109-023-00414-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10109-023-00414-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10109-023-00414-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10109-023-00414-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zachary Patterson & Steven Farber, 2015. "Potential Path Areas and Activity Spaces in Application: A Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 679-700, November.
    2. Siiri Silm & Rein Ahas, 2014. "Ethnic Differences in Activity Spaces: A Study of Out-of-Home Nonemployment Activities with Mobile Phone Data," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(3), pages 542-559, May.
    3. Luca Pappalardo & Filippo Simini & Salvatore Rinzivillo & Dino Pedreschi & Fosca Giannotti & Albert-László Barabási, 2015. "Returners and explorers dichotomy in human mobility," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, November.
    4. Shen, Yue & Chai, Yanwei & Kwan, Mei-Po, 2015. "Space–time fixity and flexibility of daily activities and the built environment: A case study of different types of communities in Beijing suburbs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 90-99.
    5. Luis Miranda-Moreno & Naveen Eluru & Martin Lee-Gosselin & Tyler Kreider, 2012. "Impact of ICT access on personal activity space and greenhouse gas production: evidence from Quebec City, Canada," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 895-918, September.
    6. Yu Liu & Xi Liu & Song Gao & Li Gong & Chaogui Kang & Ye Zhi & Guanghua Chi & Li Shi, 2015. "Social Sensing: A New Approach to Understanding Our Socioeconomic Environments," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 105(3), pages 512-530, May.
    7. Jue Wang & Mei-Po Kwan & Yanwei Chai, 2018. "An Innovative Context-Based Crystal-Growth Activity Space Method for Environmental Exposure Assessment: A Study Using GIS and GPS Trajectory Data Collected in Chicago," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, April.
    8. David Wong & Shih-Lung Shaw, 2011. "Measuring segregation: an activity space approach," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 127-145, June.
    9. Qiujun Wei & Jiangfeng She & Shuhua Zhang & Jinsong Ma, 2018. "Using Individual GPS Trajectories to Explore Foodscape Exposure: A Case Study in Beijing Metropolitan Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Peter Stopher & Camden FitzGerald & Min Xu, 2007. "Assessing the accuracy of the Sydney Household Travel Survey with GPS," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 723-741, November.
    11. Neutens, Tijs & Delafontaine, Matthias & Scott, Darren M. & De Maeyer, Philippe, 2012. "An analysis of day-to-day variations in individual space–time accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 81-91.
    12. Benjamin Motte-Baumvol & Olivier Bonin & Leslie Belton-Chevallier, 2017. "Who escort children: mum or dad? Exploring gender differences in escorting mobility among parisian dual-earner couples," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 139-157, January.
    13. Antonio Páez & Ruben Gertes Mercado & Steven Farber & Catherine Morency & Matthew Roorda, 2010. "Relative Accessibility Deprivation Indicators for Urban Settings: Definitions and Application to Food Deserts in Montreal," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(7), pages 1415-1438, June.
    14. Malia Jones & Anne Pebley, 2014. "Redefining Neighborhoods Using Common Destinations: Social Characteristics of Activity Spaces and Home Census Tracts Compared," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(3), pages 727-752, June.
    15. Lin Li & Lei Yang & Haihong Zhu & Rongrong Dai, 2015. "Explorative Analysis of Wuhan Intra-Urban Human Mobility Using Social Media Check-In Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Kamyar Hasanzadeh & Tiina Laatikainen & Marketta Kyttä, 2018. "A place-based model of local activity spaces: individual place exposure and characteristics," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 227-252, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abbasi, Sorath & Ko, Joonho & Min, Jaehong, 2021. "Measuring destination-based segregation through mobility patterns: Application of transport card data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Olle Järv & Kerli Müürisepp & Rein Ahas & Ben Derudder & Frank Witlox, 2015. "Ethnic differences in activity spaces as a characteristic of segregation: A study based on mobile phone usage in Tallinn, Estonia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(14), pages 2680-2698, November.
    3. Li, Ran & Tong, Daoqin, 2017. "Incorporating activity space and trip chaining into facility siting for accessibility maximization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-14.
    4. Li, Ran & Tong, Daoqin, 2016. "Constructing human activity spaces: A new approach incorporating complex urban activity-travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 23-35.
    5. Zhang, Yanji & Wang, Jiejing & Kan, Changcheng, 2022. "Temporal variation in activity-space-based segregation: A case study of Beijing using location-based service data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Lina Hedman & Kati Kadarik & Roger Andersson & John Östh, 2021. "Daily Mobility Patterns: Reducing or Reproducing Inequalities and Segregation?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 208-221.
    7. Wang, Yafei & Chen, Bi Yu & Yuan, Hui & Wang, Donggen & Lam, William H.K. & Li, Qingquan, 2018. "Measuring temporal variation of location-based accessibility using space-time utility perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 13-24.
    8. Tao, Sui & He, Sylvia Y. & Kwan, Mei-Po & Luo, Shuli, 2020. "Does low income translate into lower mobility? An investigation of activity space in Hong Kong between 2002 and 2011," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Yiming Tan & Mei-Po Kwan & Zifeng Chen, 2020. "Examining Ethnic Exposure through the Perspective of the Neighborhood Effect Averaging Problem: A Case Study of Xining, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Tana & Mei-Po Kwan & Yanwei Chai, 2016. "Urban form, car ownership and activity space in inner suburbs: A comparison between Beijing (China) and Chicago (United States)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(9), pages 1784-1802, July.
    11. Duan, Zhengyu & Zhao, Haoran & Li, Zhenming, 2023. "Non-linear effects of built environment and socio-demographics on activity space," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    12. Lo, A. W.-T. & Houston, D., 2018. "How do compact, accessible, and walkable communities promote gender equality in spatial behavior?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 42-54.
    13. Toger, Marina & Türk, Umut & Östh, John & Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter, 2023. "Inequality in leisure mobility: An analysis of activity space segregation spectra in the Stockholm conurbation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    14. Fei Li & Donggen Wang, 2017. "Measuring urban segregation based on individuals’ daily activity patterns: A multidimensional approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(2), pages 467-486, February.
    15. Kamyar Hasanzadeh & Tiina Laatikainen & Marketta Kyttä, 2018. "A place-based model of local activity spaces: individual place exposure and characteristics," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 227-252, July.
    16. Matthew Hall & John Iceland & Youngmin Yi, 2019. "Racial Separation at Home and Work: Segregation in Residential and Workplace Settings," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(5), pages 671-694, October.
    17. Neutens, Tijs, 2015. "Accessibility, equity and health care: review and research directions for transport geographers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 14-27.
    18. Mofeng Yang & Yixuan Pan & Aref Darzi & Sepehr Ghader & Chenfeng Xiong & Lei Zhang, 2022. "A data-driven travel mode share estimation framework based on mobile device location data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1339-1383, October.
    19. Olle Järv & Anu Masso & Siiri Silm & Rein Ahas, 2021. "The Link Between Ethnic Segregation and Socio‐Economic Status: An Activity Space Approach," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(3), pages 319-335, July.
    20. Liu, Kai & Murayama, Yuji & Ichinose, Toshiaki, 2021. "A multi-view of the daily urban rhythms of human mobility in the Tokyo metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:25:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10109-023-00414-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.