IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v49y2017i3d10.1007_s10614-016-9569-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accurate and Robust Numerical Methods for the Dynamic Portfolio Management Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Fei Cong

    (Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, TU Delft)

  • Cornelis W. Oosterlee

    (Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, TU Delft
    CWI-Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica)

Abstract

This paper enhances a well-known dynamic portfolio management algorithm, the BGSS algorithm, proposed by Brandt et al. (Review of Financial Studies, 18(3):831–873, 2005). We equip this algorithm with the components from a recently developed method, the Stochastic Grid Bundling Method (SGBM), for calculating conditional expectations. When solving the first-order conditions for a portfolio optimum, we implement a Taylor series expansion based on a nonlinear decomposition to approximate the utility functions. In the numerical tests, we show that our algorithm is accurate and robust in approximating the optimal investment strategies, which are generated by a new benchmark approach based on the COS method (Fang and Oosterlee, in SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing, 31(2):826–848, 2008).

Suggested Citation

  • Fei Cong & Cornelis W. Oosterlee, 2017. "Accurate and Robust Numerical Methods for the Dynamic Portfolio Management Problem," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 49(3), pages 433-458, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:49:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10614-016-9569-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-016-9569-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-016-9569-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-016-9569-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael W. Brandt & Amit Goyal & Pedro Santa-Clara & Jonathan R. Stroud, 2005. "A Simulation Approach to Dynamic Portfolio Choice with an Application to Learning About Return Predictability," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 831-873.
    2. Eric Jondeau & Michael Rockinger, 2006. "Optimal Portfolio Allocation under Higher Moments," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 12(1), pages 29-55, January.
    3. Cong, F. & Oosterlee, C.W., 2016. "Multi-period mean–variance portfolio optimization based on Monte-Carlo simulation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 23-38.
    4. Lorenzo Garlappi & Georgios Skoulakis, 2009. "Numerical Solutions to Dynamic Portfolio Problems: The Case for Value Function Iteration using Taylor Approximation," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 33(2), pages 193-207, March.
    5. Cochrane, John H, 1989. "The Sensitivity of Tests of the Intertemporal Allocation of Consumption to Near-Rational Alternatives," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(3), pages 319-337, June.
    6. Richard Bellman, 1957. "On a Dynamic Programming Approach to the Caterer Problem--I," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 270-278, April.
    7. Paul A. Samuelson, 2011. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection by Dynamic Stochastic Programming," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & Edward O Thorp & William T Ziemba (ed.), THE KELLY CAPITAL GROWTH INVESTMENT CRITERION THEORY and PRACTICE, chapter 31, pages 465-472, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Jain, Shashi & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2015. "The Stochastic Grid Bundling Method: Efficient pricing of Bermudan options and their Greeks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 412-431.
    9. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    10. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    11. Jules H. van Binsbergen & Michael W. Brandt, 2007. "Optimal Asset Allocation in Asset Liability Management," NBER Working Papers 12970, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Fang, Fang & Oosterlee, Kees, 2008. "A Novel Pricing Method For European Options Based On Fourier-Cosine Series Expansions," MPRA Paper 9319, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Fang, Fang & Oosterlee, Kees, 2008. "Pricing Early-Exercise and Discrete Barrier Options by Fourier-Cosine Series Expansions," MPRA Paper 9248, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Jules Binsbergen & Michael Brandt, 2007. "Solving dynamic portfolio choice problems by recursing on optimized portfolio weights or on the value function?," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 355-367, May.
    15. Marjon Ruijter & Kees Oosterlee, 2012. "Two-dimensional Fourier cosine series expansion method for pricing financial options," CPB Discussion Paper 225, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    16. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    17. Nicholas Barberis, 2000. "Investing for the Long Run when Returns Are Predictable," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(1), pages 225-264, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Yichen & Escobar-Anel, Marcos, 2022. "Polynomial affine approach to HARA utility maximization with applications to OrnsteinUhlenbeck 4/2 models," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 418(C).
    2. Yichen Zhu & Marcos Escobar-Anel & Matt Davison, 2023. "A Polynomial-Affine Approximation for Dynamic Portfolio Choice," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(3), pages 1177-1213, October.
    3. Yichen Zhu & Marcos Escobar-Anel, 2021. "A Neural Network Monte Carlo Approximation for Expected Utility Theory," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Rongju Zhang & Nicolas Langren'e & Yu Tian & Zili Zhu & Fima Klebaner & Kais Hamza, 2018. "Local Control Regression: Improving the Least Squares Monte Carlo Method for Portfolio Optimization," Papers 1803.11467, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.
    5. Fahrenwaldt, Matthias A. & Sun, Chaofan, 2020. "Expected utility approximation and portfolio optimisation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 301-314.
    6. Qi Deng & Zhong-guo Zhou, 2024. "Liquidity Jump, Liquidity Diffusion, and Portfolio of Assets with Extreme Liquidity," Papers 2407.00813, arXiv.org.
    7. Matt Davison & Marcos Escobar-Anel & Yichen Zhu, 2024. "Optimal Market Completion through Financial Derivatives with Applications to Volatility Risk," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Rongju Zhang & Nicolas Langrené & Yu Tian & Zili Zhu & Fima Klebaner & Kais Hamza, 2019. "Skewed target range strategy for multiperiod portfolio optimization using a two-stage least squares Monte Carlo method," Post-Print hal-02909342, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rongju Zhang & Nicolas Langren'e & Yu Tian & Zili Zhu & Fima Klebaner & Kais Hamza, 2016. "Dynamic portfolio optimization with liquidity cost and market impact: a simulation-and-regression approach," Papers 1610.07694, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2019.
    2. Yichen Zhu & Marcos Escobar-Anel & Matt Davison, 2023. "A Polynomial-Affine Approximation for Dynamic Portfolio Choice," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(3), pages 1177-1213, October.
    3. Zhu, Yichen & Escobar-Anel, Marcos, 2022. "Polynomial affine approach to HARA utility maximization with applications to OrnsteinUhlenbeck 4/2 models," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 418(C).
    4. Legendre, François & Togola, Djibril, 2016. "Explicit solutions to dynamic portfolio choice problems: A continuous-time detour," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 627-641.
    5. Mark Broadie & Weiwei Shen, 2017. "Numerical solutions to dynamic portfolio problems with upper bounds," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 215-227, April.
    6. Rongju Zhang & Nicolas Langren'e & Yu Tian & Zili Zhu & Fima Klebaner & Kais Hamza, 2018. "Local Control Regression: Improving the Least Squares Monte Carlo Method for Portfolio Optimization," Papers 1803.11467, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.
    7. Simon Lysbjerg Hansen, 2005. "A Malliavin-based Monte-Carlo Approach for Numerical Solution of Stochastic Control Problems: Experiences from Merton's Problem," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 391, Society for Computational Economics.
    8. Michael W. Brandt & Amit Goyal & Pedro Santa-Clara & Jonathan R. Stroud, 2005. "A Simulation Approach to Dynamic Portfolio Choice with an Application to Learning About Return Predictability," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 831-873.
    9. Mehlkopf, R.J., 2011. "Risk sharing with the unborn," Other publications TiSEM fe8a8df6-455f-4624-af10-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Yichen Zhu & Marcos Escobar-Anel, 2021. "A Neural Network Monte Carlo Approximation for Expected Utility Theory," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Mark Broadie & Weiwei Shen, 2016. "High-Dimensional Portfolio Optimization With Transaction Costs," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(04), pages 1-49, June.
    12. Jules H. van Binsbergen & Michael W. Brandt, 2007. "Optimal Asset Allocation in Asset Liability Management," NBER Working Papers 12970, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Rongju Zhang & Nicolas Langrené & Yu Tian & Zili Zhu & Fima Klebaner & Kais Hamza, 2019. "Skewed target range strategy for multiperiod portfolio optimization using a two-stage least squares Monte Carlo method," Post-Print hal-02909342, HAL.
    14. Ferstl, Robert & Weissensteiner, Alex, 2011. "Asset-liability management under time-varying investment opportunities," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 182-192, January.
    15. Penaranda, Francisco, 2007. "Portfolio choice beyond the traditional approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24481, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Massimo Guidolin & Giovanna Nicodano, 2010. "Ex Post Portfolio Performance with Predictable Skewness and Kurtosis," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 191, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    17. Jimmy E. Hilliard & Jitka Hilliard, 2018. "Rebalancing versus buy and hold: theory, simulation and empirical analysis," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 1-32, January.
    18. John Y. Campbell & Luis M. Viceira, 2005. "The Term Structure of the Risk–Return Trade-Off," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(1), pages 34-44, January.
    19. Zhang, Yugui & Zhu, Jie & Zhu, Xiaoneng, 2020. "Investing for the long run when expected equity premium is nonnegative," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Björn Bick & Holger Kraft & Claus Munk, 2013. "Solving Constrained Consumption-Investment Problems by Simulation of Artificial Market Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 485-503, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:49:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10614-016-9569-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.