IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2407.00813.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Liquidity Jump, Liquidity Diffusion, and Portfolio of Assets with Extreme Liquidity

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Deng
  • Zhong-guo Zhou

Abstract

We model a portfolio of crypto assets that does not respond well to multivariate autoregressive models because of discontinuity in conditional covariance matrix and posterior covariance matrix caused by extreme liquidity. We adjust asset-level return and volatility with liquidity to reduce such discontinuity, and restore the effectiveness of a set of liquidity-adjusted VECM-DCC/ADCC-BL models at extreme liquidity. We establish two distinctive yet complementary portfolio liquidity measures: portfolio liquidity jump that quantifies the effect of liquidity adjustment in forecasting the conditional covariance matrix, and portfolio liquidity diffusion that quantifies the effect of liquidity adjustment in estimating the posterior covariance matrix.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Deng & Zhong-guo Zhou, 2024. "Liquidity Jump, Liquidity Diffusion, and Portfolio of Assets with Extreme Liquidity," Papers 2407.00813, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2407.00813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.00813
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jui-Cheng Hung & Jung-Bin Su & Matthew C. Chang & Yi-Hsien Wang, 2020. "The impact of liquidity on portfolio value-at-risk forecasts," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 242-259, January.
    2. Robert F. Engle & Kevin Sheppard, 2001. "Theoretical and Empirical properties of Dynamic Conditional Correlation Multivariate GARCH," NBER Working Papers 8554, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Weiß, Gregor N.F. & Supper, Hendrik, 2013. "Forecasting liquidity-adjusted intraday Value-at-Risk with vine copulas," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3334-3350.
    4. Engle, Robert & Granger, Clive, 2015. "Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 39(3), pages 106-135.
    5. Vathana Ly Vath & Mohamed Mnif & Huyên Pham, 2007. "A model of optimal portfolio selection under liquidity risk and price impact," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 51-90, January.
    6. Ling, Shiqing & McAleer, Michael, 2003. "Asymptotic Theory For A Vector Arma-Garch Model," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 280-310, April.
    7. Michael W. Brandt & Amit Goyal & Pedro Santa-Clara & Jonathan R. Stroud, 2005. "A Simulation Approach to Dynamic Portfolio Choice with an Application to Learning About Return Predictability," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 831-873.
    8. Al Janabi, Mazin A.M. & Arreola Hernandez, Jose & Berger, Theo & Nguyen, Duc Khuong, 2017. "Multivariate dependence and portfolio optimization algorithms under illiquid market scenarios," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1121-1131.
    9. Kolm, Petter N. & Tütüncü, Reha & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2014. "60 Years of portfolio optimization: Practical challenges and current trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 356-371.
    10. Lorenzo Cappiello & Robert F. Engle & Kevin Sheppard, 2006. "Asymmetric Dynamics in the Correlations of Global Equity and Bond Returns," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 537-572.
    11. Nicolae Gârleanu & Lasse Heje Pedersen, 2013. "Dynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(6), pages 2309-2340, December.
    12. Fei Cong & Cornelis W. Oosterlee, 2017. "Accurate and Robust Numerical Methods for the Dynamic Portfolio Management Problem," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 49(3), pages 433-458, March.
    13. Umut Çetin & L. C. G. Rogers, 2007. "Modeling Liquidity Effects In Discrete Time," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 15-29, January.
    14. Rongju Zhang & Nicolas Langren'e & Yu Tian & Zili Zhu & Fima Klebaner & Kais Hamza, 2016. "Dynamic portfolio optimization with liquidity cost and market impact: a simulation-and-regression approach," Papers 1610.07694, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2019.
    15. Eduardo Bered Fernandes Vieira & Tiago Pascoal Filomena, 2020. "Liquidity Constraints for Portfolio Selection Based on Financial Volume," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 56(4), pages 1055-1077, December.
    16. Rongju Zhang & Nicolas Langrené & Yu Tian & Zili Zhu & Fima Klebaner & Kais Hamza, 2019. "Dynamic portfolio optimization with liquidity cost and market impact: a simulation-and-regression approach," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 519-532, March.
    17. Phillips, Peter C B & Ouliaris, S, 1990. "Asymptotic Properties of Residual Based Tests for Cointegration," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 165-193, January.
    18. Mazin Al Janabi, 2013. "Optimal and coherent economic-capital structures: evidence from long and short-sales trading positions under illiquid market perspectives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 205(1), pages 109-139, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi Deng & Zhong-guo Zhou, 2023. "Liquidity Premium, Liquidity-Adjusted Return and Volatility, and Extreme Liquidity," Papers 2306.15807, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    2. Rongju Zhang & Nicolas Langrené & Yu Tian & Zili Zhu & Fima Klebaner & Kais Hamza, 2019. "Skewed target range strategy for multiperiod portfolio optimization using a two-stage least squares Monte Carlo method," Post-Print hal-02909342, HAL.
    3. Caporin, Massimiliano & McAleer, Michael, 2014. "Robust ranking of multivariate GARCH models by problem dimension," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 172-185.
    4. Rongju Zhang & Nicolas Langren'e & Yu Tian & Zili Zhu & Fima Klebaner & Kais Hamza, 2018. "Local Control Regression: Improving the Least Squares Monte Carlo Method for Portfolio Optimization," Papers 1803.11467, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.
    5. Massimiliano Caporin & Michael McAleer, 2010. "Ranking Multivariate GARCH Models by Problem Dimension," CARF F-Series CARF-F-219, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    6. Dahiru A. Balaa & Taro Takimotob, 2017. "Stock markets volatility spillovers during financial crises: A DCC-MGARCH with skewed-t density approach," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 17(1), pages 25-48, March.
    7. Adekunle, Salami Saheed & Masih, Mansur, 2017. "Assessing the viability of Sukuk for portfolio diversification using MS-DCC-GARCH," MPRA Paper 79443, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Annastiina Silvennoinen & Timo Ter�svirta, 2015. "Modeling Conditional Correlations of Asset Returns: A Smooth Transition Approach," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1-2), pages 174-197, February.
    9. Pejman Peykani & Mojtaba Nouri & Mir Saman Pishvaee & Camelia Oprean-Stan & Emran Mohammadi, 2023. "Credibilistic Multi-Period Mean-Entropy Rolling Portfolio Optimization Problem Based on Multi-Stage Scenario Tree," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Massimiliano Caporin & Michael McAleer, 2009. "Do We Really Need Both BEKK and DCC? A Tale of Two Covariance Models," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-638, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    11. Ghaemi Asl, Mahdi & Rashidi, Muhammad Mahdi & Tavakkoli, Hamid Raza & Rezgui, Hichem, 2024. "Does Islamic investing modify portfolio performance? Time-varying optimization strategies for conventional and Shariah energy-ESG-utilities portfolio," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 37-57.
    12. Massimiliano Caporin & Michael McAleer, 2012. "Do We Really Need Both Bekk And Dcc? A Tale Of Two Multivariate Garch Models," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 736-751, September.
    13. Massimiliano Caporin & Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti & Giulio Palomba, 2020. "Analytical Gradients of Dynamic Conditional Correlation Models," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Pinar Evrim-Mandaci & Hakan Kahyaoglu & Efe Caglar Cagli, 2011. "Stock and bond market interactions with two regime shifts: evidence from Turkey," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(18), pages 1355-1368.
    15. Saif Siddiqui & Preeti Roy, 2019. "Predicting Volatility and Dynamic Relation Between Stock Market, Exchange Rate and Select Commodities," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(6), pages 1597-1611.
    16. Sugra Humbatova & Afag Huseyn & Natig Gadim-Oglu Hajiyev, 2023. "Impact of Oil Factor on Investment: The Case of Azerbaijan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(2), pages 129-148, March.
    17. Theodosios Perifanis & Athanasios Dagoumas, 2018. "Price and Volatility Spillovers Between the US Crude Oil and Natural Gas Wholesale Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Mollah, Sabur & Zafirov, Goran & Quoreshi, AMM Shahiduzzaman, 2014. "Financial Market Contagion during the Global Financial Crisis," Working Papers 2014/05, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics.
    19. Colacito, Riccardo & Engle, Robert F. & Ghysels, Eric, 2011. "A component model for dynamic correlations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 45-59, September.
    20. Caporin, M. & McAleer, M.J., 2011. "Ranking Multivariate GARCH Models by Problem Dimension: An Empirical Evaluation," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2011-18, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2407.00813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.