IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v14y2024i5p654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Technology on the Motivation of English Language Learners in Online Settings

Author

Listed:
  • Naif Abdullah Alqurashi

Abstract

As online learning continues to gain prominence, understanding the factors influencing learner motivation in virtual environments becomes crucial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of technology and circumstantial factors on the motivation of English language learners engaged in online settings. Through an online questionnaire, data will be collected from approximately 20 participants at Taif University or via crowdsourcing platforms. The questionnaire employed a five-point Likert scale to assess learner motivation and gather ratings on ten factors- five technology-related (device age, speed, display, audio quality, mobility) and five circumstantial (device availability, proficiency, commuting feasibility, external responsibilities, interest in the field). Statistical analysis using Spearman's correlation was conducted to examine the relationships between these factors and motivation. The research revealed that device and internet speed stood out as the most crucial technological determinant of student motivation, with a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.63. The quality of audio during online lessons also emerged as significant, with a moderate positive correlation of 0.43 with motivation. Interestingly, device mobility did not exhibit a notable correlation with student motivation. Regarding circumstantial factors, students' general interest in pursuing the degree requiring online English learning was the most influential factor affecting motivation, with a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.53. Students' proficiency in using devices for online learning was another crucial factor, showing a moderate positive correlation of 0.4 with motivation. Unexpectedly, proximity to educational institutions did not correlate significantly with motivation for online learning. However, students with additional responsibilities tended to be more motivated, potentially due to the flexibility of online education.

Suggested Citation

  • Naif Abdullah Alqurashi, 2024. "The Impact of Technology on the Motivation of English Language Learners in Online Settings," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 14(5), pages 654-654, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/26259/16461
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/26259
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Di Xu & Shanna S. Jaggars, 2014. "Performance Gaps between Online and Face-to-Face Courses: Differences across Types of Students and Academic Subject Areas," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(5), pages 633-659, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jane Amunga, 2021. "Leveraging technology to enhance STEM Education Amidst the Covid-19 pandemic: An overview of pertinent concerns," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 18(1), pages 40-55, April.
    2. Peter Riley Bahr & Claire A. Boeck & Phyllis A. Cummins, 2022. "Is Age Just a Number? A Statewide Investigation of Community College Students’ Age, Classroom Context, and Course Outcomes in College Math and English," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 63(4), pages 631-671, June.
    3. Marigee Bacolod & Stephen Mehay & Elda Pema, 2018. "Who succeeds in distance learning? Evidence from quantile panel data estimation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(4), pages 1129-1145, April.
    4. Carolyn Chisadza & Matthew Clance & Thulani Mthembu & Nicky Nicholls & Eleni Yitbarek, 2021. "Online and face‐to‐face learning: Evidence from students’ performance during the Covid‐19 pandemic," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 33(S1), pages 114-125, April.
    5. Kameshwari Shankar & Punit Arora & Maria Christina Binz-Scharf, 2023. "Evidence on Online Higher Education: The Promise of COVID-19 Pandemic Data," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 48(2), pages 242-249, May.
    6. Maura A. E. Pilotti & Khadija El Alaoui & Hanadi M. Abdelsalam & Rahat Khan, 2023. "Sustainable Development in Action: A Retrospective Case Study on Students’ Learning Before, During, and After the Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Ahn, Kunwon & Lee, Jun Yeong & Winters, John V., 2020. "Employment Opportunities and High School Completion during the COVID-19 Recession," IZA Discussion Papers 13802, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Orlov, George & McKee, Douglas & Berry, James & Boyle, Austin & DiCiccio, Thomas & Ransom, Tyler & Rees-Jones, Alex & Stoye, Jörg, 2021. "Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: It is not who you teach, but how you teach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Dr. Oliver Magasu (PhD), 2021. "Learner Centred Education LCE amidst Corona Virus in Selected Secondary Schools in Zambia: Challenges, New Trends and Way Forward," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(09), pages 717-722, September.
    10. Raul G. Moldez & Dr. Qaisar Abbas & Humaira Dogar & Saima Nasreen & Sajid Hasan & Kashif Lodhi, 2023. "The Impact of Online Business Courses on Student Performance," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(3), pages 677-682.
    11. Hardt, David & Nagler, Markus & Rincke, Johannes, 2022. "Can peer mentoring improve online teaching effectiveness? An RCT during the COVID-19 pandemic," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Hardt, David & Nagler, Markus & Rincke, Johannes, 2023. "Tutoring in (online) higher education: Experimental evidence," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Cassandra M.D. Hart & Elizabeth Friedmann & Michael Hill, 2018. "Online Course-taking and Student Outcomes in California Community Colleges," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 13(1), pages 42-71, Winter.
    14. John M. Krieg & Steven E. Henson, 2016. "The Educational Impact of Online Learning: How Do University Students Perform in Subsequent Courses?," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 11(4), pages 426-448, Fall.
    15. Masato Ikeda & Shintaro Yamaguchi, 2021. "Online learning during school closure due to COVID-19," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 471-507, July.
    16. Rikito Hori & Makoto Fujii, 2021. "Impact of Using ICT for Learning Purposes on Self-Efficacy and Persistence: Evidence from Pisa 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, June.
    17. Sheryl Burgstahler, 2015. "Opening Doors or Slamming Them Shut? Online Learning Practices and Students with Disabilities," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(6), pages 69-79.
    18. Fengxia Zhu & Yueyun Zhang & Qi Li & Yuanyao Xu & Baozhong Liu, 2022. "Families, Schools, and the Longitudinal Changes in Psychological Distress among College Students during the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from a National Panel Survey in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Justin C. Ortagus, 2018. "National Evidence of the Impact of First-Year Online Enrollment on Postsecondary Students’ Long-Term Academic Outcomes," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(8), pages 1035-1058, December.
    20. Argenis P. Vergara-Torres & Verónica Ortiz-Rodríguez & Orlando Reyes-Hernández & Jeanette M. López-Walle & Raquel Morquecho-Sánchez & José Tristán, 2022. "Validation and Factorial Invariance of the Life Skills Ability Scale in Mexican Higher Education Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.