IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v12y2022i3p263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancement of Supply Chain Management through Educating Key Processes with the Hub and Spoke Model Based on Multi-Adaptive Spider Monkey Optimization Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Shashidharan. M
  • Yogesh Mahajan
  • Shameem Anwar

Abstract

Supply chain performance improvement has become a critical issue for gaining a competitive edge for companies. Over the last decade of the evolution of supply chain management (SCM), a steady stream of research and articles dealing with the theory and practice of SCM have been published, but the topic of performance measurement has not received adequate consideration. However, many critical drawbacks prevent the existing performance measurement systems from making a significant contribution to the development and improvement of SCM and thus, several researches is still needed in this area. So, we present a unique multi-adaptive spider monkey optimization algorithm (MASMOA) to enhance the ability of hub and spoke model to educate the key process throughout the SCM. Initially, for the pre-processing step, we use a normalizing technique to remove unwanted noises from the raw dataset, and then we use principal component analysis (PCA) to extract the unwanted features from the pre-processed data. The information was then encrypted and fed into the hub-and-spoke model for data protection purpose. The proposed method is then used to optimize the hub and spoke model's transport process over hubs. The optimized data is then decoded using a decryption technique to transform the encrypted information into actual format. The Rivest–Shamir–Adleman (RSA) algorithm was used for the encryption and decryption operations. Finally, performance measures such as encryption and decryption execution time, security rate, and scalability level are compared to comparable techniques. Using the MATLAB environment, the results are shown.

Suggested Citation

  • Shashidharan. M & Yogesh Mahajan & Shameem Anwar, 2022. "Enhancement of Supply Chain Management through Educating Key Processes with the Hub and Spoke Model Based on Multi-Adaptive Spider Monkey Optimization Algorithm," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(3), pages 263-263, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/21808/13509
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/21808
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mansour Rahimi & Ardavan Asef-Vaziri & Robert Harrison, 2008. "An Inland Port Location-Allocation Model for a Regional Intermodal Goods Movement System," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(4), pages 362-379, December.
    2. Si Chen & Xingchen Liu & Jiaqi Yan & Guangwei Hu & Yani Shi, 2021. "Processes, benefits, and challenges for adoption of blockchain technologies in food supply chains: a thematic analysis," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 909-935, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Zhen & Woo, Su-Han & Lai, Po-Lin & Chen, Xiaoyi, 2022. "The economic impact of inland ports on regional development: Evidence from the Yangtze River region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 80-91.
    2. de Almeida Rodrigues, Thiago & Maria de Miranda Mota, Caroline & Manuele dos Santos, Inez, 2021. "Determining dry port criteria that support decision making," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Yiran Sun & Yuqian Wang & Jingci Xie, 2022. "The co-evolution of seaports and dry ports in Shandong province in China under the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    5. Teye, Collins & Bell, Michael G.H. & Bliemer, Michiel C.J., 2017. "Entropy maximising facility location model for port city intermodal terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-16.
    6. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2020. "Dry Port Terminal Location Selection by Applying the Hybrid Grey MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Gu, Yimiao, 2016. "A market-oriented approach for intermodal network optimisation meeting cost, time and environmental requirements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 266-274.
    8. Henttu, Ville & Hilmola, Olli-Pekka, 2011. "Financial and environmental impacts of hypothetical Finnish dry port structure," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 35-41.
    9. Ghane-Ezabadi, Mohammad & Vergara, Hector A., 2016. "Decomposition approach for integrated intermodal logistics network design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 53-69.
    10. Daniela Ambrosino & Anna Sciomachen, 2021. "Impact of Externalities on the Design and Management of Multimodal Logistic Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Chen, Kang & Xu, Shihe & Haralambides, Hercules, 2020. "Determining hub port locations and feeder network designs: The case of China-West Africa trade," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 9-22.
    12. Adolf K. Y. Ng & Tianni Wang & Zaili Yang & Kevin X. Li & Changmin Jiang, 2018. "How is Business Adapting to Climate Change Impacts Appropriately? Insight from the Commercial Port Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1029-1047, July.
    13. Wiegmans, Bart & Witte, Patrick & Spit, Tejo, 2015. "Characteristics of European inland ports: A statistical analysis of inland waterway port development in Dutch municipalities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 566-577.
    14. Furkan Oztanriseven & Heather Nachtmann, 2020. "Modeling dynamic behavior of navigable inland waterways," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(2), pages 173-195, June.
    15. Egor PLOTNIKOV & Aleksandr RAKHMANGULOV, 2021. "Modeling China'S Dry Port Cooperation In Supply Chains," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 16(3), pages 89-103, September.
    16. Behzad Behdani & Bart Wiegmans & Violeta Roso & Hercules Haralambides, 2020. "Port-hinterland transport and logistics: emerging trends and frontier research," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Qiu, Xuan & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2019. "Quantity discount pricing for rail transport in a dry port system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 563-580.
    18. Chakat Chueadee & Preecha Kriengkorakot & Nuchsara Kriengkorakot, 2022. "MDEALNS for Solving the Tapioca Starch Logistics Network Problem for the Land Port of Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Park, Hyejune & Lim, Rachel Esther, 2023. "Fashion and the metaverse: Clarifying the domain and establishing a research agenda," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Bask, Anu & Roso, Violeta & Andersson, Dan & Hämäläinen, Erkki, 2014. "Development of seaport–dry port dyads: two cases from Northern Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 85-95.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.