IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v3y2014i2p92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Irony of Ethics: (De)Coding the Lived Experience of Women and Minority Faculty

Author

Listed:
  • L. Earle Reybold

Abstract

What does it mean to ‘be’ an ethical faculty member? A number of scholars point to legal and moral issues, aligning ethics with professional codes and regulated by institutional policy. From this perspective, being ethical is a matter of knowing and following the professional rules—the goal is to avoid certain actions. On the other hand, others question this objectivist approach and position faculty ethics as an experience, a fusion of personal and professional histories that include disciplinary training, socialization to the profession, and—especially—the specter of faculty rewards such as tenure and promotion. This article explores these competing perspectives in a qualitative meta-synthesis of data collected across studies of faculty identity, professional epistemology, and academic ethics. Analysis concentrates on 116 interviews with women and minority doctoral students and faculty members conducted between 1999 and 2012, a subset of more than 200 interviews I conducted during this timeframe. All interviews were initially coded using constant comparative analysis. For the meta-synthesis, I chose to apply an elaborative coding technique that juxtaposes data with the ethics literature related to chilly and alienating climates, cultural taxation, and the snare of faculty rewards in higher education. This (re)analysis allowed me engage in a formal dialogue between local theory and scholarship, resulting in six sub-themes- ‘real’izing, acting out/in, toiling, serving, aligning, and diverging. Findings and discussion concentrate on questioning the traditional definition of faculty ethics, linking experiences to existing scholarship, and supporting the method of metasynthesis across qualitative longitudinal inquiry.Â

Suggested Citation

  • L. Earle Reybold, 2014. "The Irony of Ethics: (De)Coding the Lived Experience of Women and Minority Faculty," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(2), pages 1-92, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/3761/2726
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/3761
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darnell Cole, 2007. "Do Interracial Interactions Matter? An Examination of Student-Faculty Contact and Intellectual Self-Concept," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(3), pages 249-281, May.
    2. John G. Bruhn & Gary Zajac & Ali A. Al-Kazemi & Loren D. Prescott, 2002. "Moral Positions and Academic Conduct," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(4), pages 461-493, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Fan & Xia, Zhichen, 2023. "Perceived discrimination and academic self-concept among left-behind children in China: The role of school belonging and classroom composition," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Gregory C. Wolniak & Marjolein Muskens, 2021. "Undermatching and Noncognitive Development during the First Year of College: A Longitudinal Study of College Students in the Netherlands," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 62(6), pages 855-884, September.
    3. Joanne Jones & Gary Spraakman & Cristóbal Sánchez-Rodríguez, 2014. "What’s in it for Me? An Examination of Accounting Students’ Likelihood to Report Faculty Misconduct," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(4), pages 645-667, September.
    4. Joanne Jones & Gary Spraakman, 2011. "A Case of Academic Misconduct: Does Self‐Interest Rule?," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Sirgy, M. Joseph & Johar, J.S., 2010. "Developing a measure to capture marketing faculty's perceptions of unethical behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 366-371, April.
    6. Young K. Kim & Linda J. Sax, 2018. "The Effect of Positive Faculty Support on Mathematical Self-Concept for Male and Female Students in STEM Majors," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(8), pages 1074-1104, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.