IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iza/izawol/journly2016n285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public or private job placement services—Are private ones more effective?

Author

Listed:
  • Gesine Stephan

    (IAB, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), and IZA,Germany)

Abstract

Expenditures on job placement and related services make up a substantial share of many countries’ GDP. Contracting out to private providers is often proposed as a more efficient alternative to the state provision of placement services. However, the responsible state agency has to design and monitor sufficiently complete contracts to ensure that the private contractors deliver the desired quality of services. None of the recent empirical evidence indicates that contracting out is necessarily more effective or more efficient than public employment services.

Suggested Citation

  • Gesine Stephan, 2016. "Public or private job placement services—Are private ones more effective?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 285-285, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:iza:izawol:journl:y:2016:n:285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wol.iza.org/articles/public-or-private-job-placement-services-are-private-ones-more-effective-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://wol.iza.org/articles/public-or-private-job-placement-services-are-private-ones-more-effective
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blank, Rebecca M, 2000. "When Can Public Policy Makers Rely on Private Markets? The Effective Provision of Social Services," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 110(462), pages 34-49, March.
    2. Bennmarker, Helge & Grönqvist, Erik & Öckert, Björn, 2013. "Effects of contracting out employment services: Evidence from a randomized experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 68-84.
    3. Luc Behaghel & Bruno Cr?pon & Marc Gurgand, 2014. "Private and Public Provision of Counseling to Job Seekers: Evidence from a Large Controlled Experiment," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 6(4), pages 142-174, October.
    4. Koning, Pierre & van de Meerendonk, Arthur, 2014. "The impact of scoring weights on price and quality outcomes: An application to the procurement of Welfare-to-Work contracts," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Rehwald, Kai & Rosholm, Michael & Svarer, Michael, 2015. "Are Public or Private Providers of Employment Services More Effective? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 9365, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Bart Cockx & Stijn Baert, 2015. "Contracting Out Mandatory Counselling and Training for Long-Term Unemployed. Private For-Profit or Non-Profit, or Keep it Public?," CESifo Working Paper Series 5587, CESifo.
    7. Laun, Lisa & Thoursie, Peter Skogman, 2014. "Does privatisation of vocational rehabilitation improve labour market opportunities? Evidence from a field experiment in Sweden," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 59-72.
    8. Gerhard Krug & Gesine Stephan, 2016. "Private and Public Placement Services for Hard-to-Place Unemployed," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 69(2), pages 471-500, March.
    9. Homrighausen, Pia, 2014. "Differential pricing and private provider performance," IAB-Discussion Paper 201425, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    10. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01067926 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Bernhard, Sarah & Wolff, Joachim, 2008. "Contracting out placement services in Germany : is assignment to private providers effective for needy job-seekers?," IAB-Discussion Paper 200805, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Briscese, Guglielmo & Leibbrandt, Andreas, 2022. "Designing the market for job vacancies: A trust experiment with employment centers staff," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Martins, Pedro S., 2021. "Which Occupations Do Jobseekers and Firms Look For? Evidence from Three Public Employment Services," GLO Discussion Paper Series 971, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    3. Ayaita, Adam & Grund, Christian & Pütz, Lisa, 2021. "Job Placement via Private vs. Public Employment Agencies: Investigating Selection Effects and Job Match Quality in Germany," IZA Discussion Papers 14024, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Adam Ayaita & Christian Grund & Lisa Pütz, 2022. "Job Placement via Private vs. Public Employment Agencies: Investigating Selection Effects and Job Match Quality in Germany," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 137-162, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danula K. Gamage & Pedro S. Martins, 2018. "Evaluating Public-Private Partnerships in Employment Services: The Case of the UK Work Programme," Working Papers 87, Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research.
    2. Rehwald, Kai & Rosholm, Michael & Svarer, Michael, 2015. "Are Public or Private Providers of Employment Services More Effective? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 9365, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Tomasz Gajderowicz & Maciej Jakubowski, 2019. "What works for disadvantaged unemployed: Private or public ALMP services? Evidence from (unplanned) RCT in Poland," Working Papers 2019-04, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    4. Fredrik Andersson & Henrik Jordahl & Jens Josephson, 2019. "Outsourcing Public Services: Contractibility, Cost, and Quality," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 65(4), pages 349-372.
    5. Lalive, Rafael & Cottier, Lionel & Flueckiger, Yves & Kempeneers, Pierre, 2018. "Does Job Search Assistance Really Raise Employment?," CEPR Discussion Papers 13133, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Bart Cockx & Stijn Baert, 2015. "Contracting Out Mandatory Counselling and Training for Long-Term Unemployed. Private For-Profit or Non-Profit, or Keep it Public?," CESifo Working Paper Series 5587, CESifo.
    7. Adam Ayaita & Christian Grund & Lisa Pütz, 2022. "Job Placement via Private vs. Public Employment Agencies: Investigating Selection Effects and Job Match Quality in Germany," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 137-162, June.
    8. Rehwald, Kai & Rosholm, Michael & Svarer, Michael, 2017. "Do public or private providers of employment services matter for employment? Evidence from a randomized experiment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 169-187.
    9. Tomasz Gajderowicz & Maciej Jakubowski, 2019. "What Works for Disadvantaged Unemployed: Private or Public ALMP Services? Evidence from Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 332-346.
    10. Briscese, Guglielmo & Leibbrandt, Andreas, 2022. "Designing the market for job vacancies: A trust experiment with employment centers staff," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    11. Knutsson, Daniel & Tyrefors, Björn, 2020. "The Quality and Efficiency Between Public and Private Firms: Evidence from Ambulance Services," Working Paper Series 1365, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 01 Jul 2021.
    12. Adam Ayaita & Christian Grund & Lisa Pütz, 2021. "Job Placement via Private vs. Public Employment Agencies: Investigating Selection Effects and Job Match Quality in Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1121, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    13. Michèle Belot & Philipp Kircher & Paul Muller, 2019. "Providing Advice to Jobseekers at Low Cost: An Experimental Study on Online Advice," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(4), pages 1411-1447.
    14. Krister Sund, 2015. "Did the Introduction of Private Contractors Improve Turnover to Employment in the Swedish Labor Market?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 389-408, December.
    15. Pierre Koning & C.J. Heinrich, 2009. "Cream-skimming, parking and other intended and unintended effects of performance-based contracting in social welfare services," CPB Discussion Paper 134, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    16. Gerdes, Christer, 2015. "Does Performance Information Affect Job Seekers in Selecting Private Providers in Voucher-Based ALMP Programs?," IZA Discussion Papers 8992, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Krug, Gerhard & Stephan, Gesine, 2013. "Is the Contracting-Out of Intensive Placement Services More Effective than Provision by the PES? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 7403, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Lionel Cottier & Yves Flückiger & Pierre Kempeneers & Rafael Lalive, 2024. "Employment Effects of Job Search Assistance for the Long-Term Unemployed," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 114, pages 577-581, May.
    19. Michael Weber, 2016. "The short-run and long-run effects of decentralizing public employment services," ifo Working Paper Series 209, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    20. Mergele, Lukas & Weber, Michael, 2020. "Public employment services under decentralization: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    unemployment; employment services; privatization; contracting out;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L33 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprise and Nonprofit Institutions; Privatization; Contracting Out
    • J68 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Public Policy
    • J65 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Unemployment Insurance; Severance Pay; Plant Closings
    • H44 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets
    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izawol:journl:y:2016:n:285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.