IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ist/iujspc/v0y2020i79p299-328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sendikaların Sosyal Medya Kullanımına İşçilerin Bakışı: Bursa ve Kırklareli Örneği

Author

Listed:
  • Hüseyin Sevgi

    (İktisat Fakültesi, Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri. İlişkileri Anabilim Dalı, Kırklareli, Türkiye., Kırklareli Üniversitesi, Kirklareli, Turkey)

  • Aysen Tokol

    (İktisat Fakültesi, Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri. İlişkileri Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye., Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa, Turkey)

Abstract

Bilgisayar ve internet teknolojilerinde hızla gerçekleşen dönüşüm gerek günlük yaşamı gerekse çalışma yaşamını derinden etkilemektedir. Taşınabilir akıllı cihazların yaygınlaşması ve kablosuz-mobil internet ağlarının genişlemesiyle birlikte, internete erişim daha önce hiç olmadığı kadar kolay ve hızlı gerçekleşmeye başlamıştır. Bu paralelde tüm demografik, siyasi ve sosyo-ekonomik farklılıklarından bağımsız olarak işçiler de hızla birer internet kullanıcısına dönüşmüştür. Web 2.0 ile birlikte bilgisayar ve internetteki iletişimin doğası farklılaşarak, çift yönlü etkileşimin önemli olduğu bir süreç ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu süreç, sosyal medya platformlarını popülerleştirmiş, internet kullanıcılarını daha önce hiç olmadığı kadar aktif bir duruma getirmiştir. Bireyler sosyal medya sayesinde doğrudan içerik üretebilme ve başka kişilerin ürettiği içeriklerle etkileşime girme şansı yakalamışlardır. Bu bağlamda, sendikaların internet ve sosyal medya teknolojilerine nasıl yaklaşacağı ve bu teknolojilerden nasıl etkileneceği tartışma konusu olmuştur. Bu çalışmada sendikalar ve sosyal medya arasındaki ilişki hem kavramsal olarak hem de güncel örneklerle incelenmiştir. Ayrıca Bursa ve Kırklareli’nde sendikalı işçilerle yapılan derinlemesine görüşmelerle sendikaların sosyal medya kullanımına dair işçilerin bakış açısı değerlendirilmiştir.

Suggested Citation

  • Hüseyin Sevgi & Aysen Tokol, 2020. "Sendikaların Sosyal Medya Kullanımına İşçilerin Bakışı: Bursa ve Kırklareli Örneği," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(79), pages 299-328, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ist:iujspc:v:0:y:2020:i:79:p:299-328
    DOI: 10.26650/jspc.2020.79.0099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/44B420C96029417E96EF1FB2732B7034
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iupress.istanbul.edu.tr/tr/journal/jspc/article/sendikalarin-sosyal-medya-kullanimina-iscilerin-bakisi-bursa-ve-kirklareli-ornegi
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26650/jspc.2020.79.0099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Panagiotis Panagiotopoulos & Julie Barnett, 2015. "Social Media in Union Communications: An International Study with UNI Global Union Affiliates," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 508-532, September.
    2. Antonio Nicita & Matteo Rizzolli, 2010. "The case for the virtual strike," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 9(1), pages 75-75, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Innocenti & Antonio Nicita, 2009. "Virtual vs. Standard Strike: An Experiment," Labsi Experimental Economics Laboratory University of Siena 026, University of Siena.
    2. Lijun Tang, 2022. "Defending workers' rights on social media: Chinese seafarers during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 110-125, March.
    3. Alex J. Wood, 2015. "Networks of injustice and worker mobilisation at Walmart," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 259-274, July.
    4. Vincent Pasquier & Thibault Daudigeos & Marcos Barros, 2020. "Towards a New Flashmob Unionism: The Case of the Fight for 15 Movement," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 336-363, June.
    5. Michael David Maffie, 2020. "The Role of Digital Communities in Organizing Gig Workers," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 123-149, January.
    6. Lorenzo Frangi & Tingting Zhang, 2022. "Global union federations on affiliates’ websites: Forces shaping unions’ global organisational identity," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 444-466, June.
    7. Nienhüser, Werner & Peetz, David & Murray, Georgina & Troup, Carolyn, 2022. "Social media, the internet and the crisis of unionism," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 262, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    8. Lorenzo Frangi & Tingting Zhang & Robert Hebdon, 2020. "Tweeting and Retweeting for Fight for $15: Unions as Dinosaur Opinion Leaders?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 301-335, June.
    9. Nana Wesley Hansen & Mark Friis Hau, 2024. "Between Settlement and Mobilization: Political Logics of Intra-Organizational Union Communication on Social Media," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(2), pages 299-317, April.
    10. Gregor Murray, 2017. "Union renewal: what can we learn from three decades of research?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(1), pages 9-29, February.
    11. Louise Thornthwaite & Nikola Balnave & Alison Barnes, 2018. "Unions and social media: Prospects for gender inclusion," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 401-417, July.
    12. Torsten Geelan & Andy Hodder, 2017. "Enhancing transnational labour solidarity: the unfulfilled promise of the Internet and social media," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 345-364, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ist:iujspc:v:0:y:2020:i:79:p:299-328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ertugrul YASAR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifisttr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.