IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ist/ibsimj/v0y2023i94p49-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study to Determine The Antecedents of The Prosocial Rule Breaking Behaviour: A Qualitative Practice for Hotel Businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Merve Gozde Durmaz

    (Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Ezine Vocational School, Canakkale, Turkiye)

  • Gulten Gumustekin

    (Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty Member of the Department of Business, Canakkale, Turkiye)

Abstract

Prosocial behaviours are considered as pro-social behaviours that contribute to social welfare, benevolent, and do not consider individual interests. Prosocial behaviours are basically shaped by the motive of providing benefit and helping the society. While the employees exhibiting these behaviours in the social sense engage in pro-social behaviours, the social and institutional benefitoriented mindset can sometimes result in behaviours that can bend the rules of the institutions. For this purpose, nine 4 and 5 star hotels operating in the city centre of Bursa were included in the study. Data were collected by conducting face-to-face interviews with 37 hotel employees with at least two years of experience working in different departments. The data obtained from the interviews were coded, categorized and interpreted using the MAXQDA qualitative data analysis program. According to the results of the qualitative analysis, it was determined that the hotel employees expressed the prosocial rule breaking behaviour intensively behaviour required by the industry, customer orientation, benefiting the business, etc.). However, the antecedents of the prosocial rule breaking behaviours of the employees were classified under 3 main themes as individual, organizational and environmental. According to the results of our study, it can be stated that there is no sense of personal interest behind the prosocial behaviour of hotel employees, and the basis of this behaviour is reinforced by customer-oriented and organizational-oriented benefits and/or benevolence feelings.

Suggested Citation

  • Merve Gozde Durmaz & Gulten Gumustekin, 2023. "A Study to Determine The Antecedents of The Prosocial Rule Breaking Behaviour: A Qualitative Practice for Hotel Businesses," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(94), pages 49-64, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ist:ibsimj:v:0:y:2023:i:94:p:49-64
    DOI: 10.26650/imj.2024.94.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/9DFC3D1196C64946A6BF3E7DCBE17692
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iupress.istanbul.edu.tr/tr/journal/imj/article/a-study-to-determine-the-antecedents-of-the-prosocial-rule-breaking-behaviour-a-qualitative-practice-for-hotel-businesses
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26650/imj.2024.94.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moran Bodankin & Aharon Tziner, 2009. "Constructive Deviance, Destructive Deviance and Personality: How do they interrelate?," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(26), pages 549-564, June.
    2. Fan Wang & Man Zhang & Anupam Kumar Das & Haolin Weng & Peilin Yang, 2020. "Aiming at the Organizational Sustainable Development: Employees’ Pro-Social Rule Breaking as Response to High Performance Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Lisbeth Mary John & Muhammad Shafi, 2020. "Impact of organizational structure and social support on pro-social rule breaking: A frontline perspective," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1781994-178, January.
    4. Casey J. Fleming, 2020. "Prosocial rule breaking at the street level: the roles of leaders, peers, and bureaucracy," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 1191-1216, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Jancsics & Salvador Espinosa & Jonathan Carlos, 2023. "Organizational noncompliance: an interdisciplinary review of social and organizational factors," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1273-1301, September.
    2. Filiz Tabak & Aharon Tziner & Or Shkoler & Edna Rabenu, 2021. "The Complexity of Heavy Work Investment (HWI): A Conceptual Integration and Review of Antecedents, Dimensions, and Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Aharon Tziner & Erich C. Fein, 2012. "Modeling employees' deviant behavior and employers' reactions: an interdisciplinary approach using principal-agent and prospect theories," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 1(4), pages 10-20.
    4. Aharon Tziner & Erich C. Fein & Cristinel Vasiliu, 2021. "Testing a Comprehensive Model of Organizational Justice Perceptions and Personal States with Personal and Organizational Outcomes," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Hyesong Ha & Hyunkang Hur, 2024. "Public Agents’ Empowerment and Rule-Breaking Behaviors: Evidence from Panel Analysis of U.S. Federal Agencies," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 407-431, March.
    6. Or Shkoler & Aharon Tziner & Cristinel Vasiliu & Claudiu-Nicolae Ghinea, 2021. "Are Positive and Negative Outcomes of Organizational Justice Conditioned by Leader–Member Exchange?," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(56), pages 240-240, February.
    7. Ivana Načinović Braje & Ana Aleksić & Sanda Rašić Jelavić, 2020. "Blame It on Individual or Organization Environment: What Predicts Workplace Deviance More?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, June.
    8. Francisco Rodríguez-Cifuentes & Adrián Segura-Camacho & Cristina García-Ael & Gabriela Topa, 2020. "The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital between Motivational Orientations and Their Organizational Consequences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Weißmüller, Kristina Sabrina & Zuber, Anna, 2022. "Understanding the Micro-Foundations of Administrative Corruption in the Public Sector: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review," OSF Preprints z9bcy, Center for Open Science.
    10. Edna Rabenu & Or Shkoler, 2022. "Heavy-Work Investment, Its Organizational Outcomes and Conditional Factors: A Contemporary Perspective over a Decade of Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Tekmen, Esra Erenler & Kaptangil, Kerem, 2022. "The Determinants of Constructive Deviant Behaviour of Frontline Tourism Employees: An Exploration with Perceived Supervisory Support and Intrinsic Motivation," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 10(1), pages 58-74.
    12. Naqib Ullah Khan & Peng Zhongyi & Wajid Alim & Heesup Han & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Examining the dynamics of pro-social rule-breaking among grassroots public servants," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Betzelt, Sigrid & Bode, Ingo, 2022. "Emotional regimes in the political economy of the "welfare service state": The case of continuing education and active inclusion in Germany," IPE Working Papers 178/2022, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Prosocial Behaviour; Rule Breaking; Prosocial Rule Breaking Behaviour. JEL Classification :D23 ; Y10 ; Y20 ; Y80;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y10 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Data: Tables and Charts - - - Data: Tables and Charts
    • Y20 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Introductions and Prefaces - - - Introductions and Prefaces
    • Y80 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines - - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ist:ibsimj:v:0:y:2023:i:94:p:49-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ertugrul YASAR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isisttr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.