IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ipn/esecon/vxy2015i42p33-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inversión extranjera directa y empleo en el Estado de México: ¿Qué distribución sectorial?

Author

Listed:
  • Cesaire, Chiatchoua

    (Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Chimalhuacán)

  • Santabárbara-Sabino, Alejandro Mario

    (Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Chimalhuacán)

Abstract

El objetivo de este trabajo es mostrar la importancia de la IED en la distribución del empleo dentro de los sectores económicos del Estado de México. Los datos son recolectados del Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI) muestran que la evolución de la IED ha sido inestable, mientras que la PEA ha crecido de manera constante entre los años 2000 hasta 2014. Por otro lado, el sector industrial ha recibido más IED que cualquier otro a lo largo de los años 1999 hasta 2012, con una participación del 70.8%, seguido por el sector servicios con 29% y finalmente el sector agropecuario con 0.2%. Con respeto a la PEA, el sector servicios cumula una participación de 67.2%, luego el sector industrial con el 27.3% y el sector primario con 5.5%. Al final, los resultados de la elasticidad IED-empleo muestran que existe una relación entre ambas variables, pero muy débil./ The aim of this paper is to show the importance of FDI in the distribution of employment in the economic sectors of the State of Mexico. The data, collected from the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) showed that the evolution of FDI has been unstable, while the PEA has grown steadily from 2000 to 2014. On the other hand, the industrial sector has received more FDI than any otherover the years 1999-2012, with a share of 70.8%, followed by the services sector with 29% and finally the agricultural sector 0.2%. According to the PEA, the services sector has a share of 67.2%, following by the industrial sector with 27.3% and the primary sector5.5%. In the end, the results of FDI-employment elasticity showed that there is a relationship between the two variables, but not the expected.

Suggested Citation

  • Cesaire, Chiatchoua & Santabárbara-Sabino, Alejandro Mario, 2015. "Inversión extranjera directa y empleo en el Estado de México: ¿Qué distribución sectorial?," eseconomía, Escuela Superior de Economía, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, vol. 0(42), pages 33-50, primer se.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipn:esecon:v:x:y:2015:i:42:p:33-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://yuss.me/revistas/ese/ese2015v10n42a02p033_050.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Waldkirch, 2010. "The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment in Mexico since NAFTA," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 710-745, May.
    2. Nunnenkamp, Peter & Bremont, José Eduardo Alatorre, 2007. "FDI in Mexico: An empirical assessment of employment effects," Kiel Working Papers 1328, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Mr. Ramana Ramaswamy & Mr. Bob Rowthorn, 1997. "Deindustrialization: Causes and Implications," IMF Working Papers 1997/042, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rene Cabral & Andre Varella Mollick & Joao Ricardo Faria, 2010. "Capital and Labour Mobility and their Impacts on Mexico's Regional Labour Markets," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(9), pages 1523-1542.
    2. Mohammad Zulfan Tadjoeddin & Ilmiawan Auwalin & Anis Chowdhury, 2016. "Revitalizing Indonesia’s manufacturing: the productivity conundrum," Departmental Working Papers 2016-20, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    3. Téllez-León, Isela E. & Venegas-Martínez, Francisco, 2018. "Impacto de la inversión extranjera directa en el PIB mexicano por país de origen y entidad federativa de destino," Panorama Económico, Escuela Superior de Economía, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, vol. 13(26), pages 47-79, Primer se.
    4. Jose Romero, 2012. "Inversión extranjera directa y crecimiento económico en México: 1940-2010," Serie documentos de trabajo del Centro de Estudios Económicos 2012-12, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos.
    5. Jochen Hartwig, 2008. "Has Health Capital Formation Cured 'Baumol's Disease'? - Panel Granger Causality Evidence for OECD Countries," KOF Working papers 08-206, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    6. Maurice J. G. Bun & Abderrahman El Makhloufi, 2007. "Dynamic Externalities, Local Industrial Structure and Economic Development: Panel Data Evidence for Morocco," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 823-837.
    7. Blum, Bernardo S., 2008. "Trade, technology, and the rise of the service sector: The effects on US wage inequality," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 441-458, March.
    8. Emre Gökçeli & Jan Fidrmuc & Sugata Ghosh, 2022. "Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth and Domestic Investment: Evidence from OECD Countries," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 190-216.
    9. Vu, Khuong & Haraguchi, Nobuya & Amann, Juergen, 2021. "Deindustrialization in developed countries amid accelerated globalization: Patterns, influencers, and policy insights," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 454-469.
    10. Sami Ben Mim & Abir Hedi & Mohamed Sami Ben Ali, 2022. "Industrialization, FDI and absorptive capacities: evidence from African Countries," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 1739-1766, August.
    11. Daniel Ştefan Armeanu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2017. "Empirical Study towards the Drivers of Sustainable Economic Growth in EU-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Youngho Kang & Byung-Yeon Kim, 2018. "Immigration and economic growth: do origin and destination matter?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(46), pages 4968-4984, October.
    13. Alcaraz, Carlo & Villalvazo, Sergio, 2017. "The effect of natural gas shortages on the Mexican economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-153.
    14. Khalil, Umair, 2017. "Do more guns lead to more crime? Understanding the role of illegal firearms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 342-361.
    15. Thorsten Lehnert, 2019. "Asset pricing implications of good governance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Cho, Seo-young & Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, 2010. "Compliance for big brothers: An empirical analysis on the impact of the anti-trafficking protocol," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 118, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    17. Katsushi S. Imai & Raghav Gaiha & Ganesh Thapa & Samuel Kobina Annim, 2013. "Financial Crisis In Asia: Its Genesis, Severity And Impact On Poverty And Hunger," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(8), pages 1105-1116, November.
    18. Marco Botta & Luca Colombo, 2016. "Macroeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Capital Structure Decisions," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza def038, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    19. International Monetary Fund, 2016. "Republic of Poland: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2016/211, International Monetary Fund.
    20. Arturas Juodis, 2013. "Cointegration Testing in Panel VAR Models Under Partial Identification and Spatial Dependence," UvA-Econometrics Working Papers 13-08, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Dept. of Econometrics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    IED; PEA; sectores económicos; Estado de México; elasticidad/ FDI; PEA; economic sectors; State of Mexico; elasticity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipn:esecon:v:x:y:2015:i:42:p:33-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Juan Marroquín-Arreola (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eeipnmx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.