IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v45y1997i5p751-757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Heuristic for Estimating Nadir Criterion Values in Multiple Objective Linear Programming

Author

Listed:
  • Pekka Korhonen

    (Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki, Finland)

  • Seppo Salo

    (Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki, Finland)

  • Ralph E. Steuer

    (University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia)

Abstract

In this paper we further investigate the problem of finding nadir criterion values (minimum criterion values over the nondominated set) in multiple objective linear programming. Although easy to obtain, the minimum values present in a payoff table are unreliable and should only be used with caution, especially in problems that have more than a small number of extreme points. To obtain better estimates of the nadir criterion values without adding great complexity to the task, we present an approach based upon the use of reference directions. At each iteration of this approach, a reference direction is chosen that maximally minimizes the objective under consideration. We proceed with reference directions that accomplish this until the objective under consideration reaches a local minimum over the nondominated set. Then a cutting plane is inserted into the problem and another direction, if one can be found, that maximally minimizes the objective under consideration is employed. Although the method is heuristic, computational experience shows that much better estimates of the nadir criterion values can be obtained than from payoff tables.

Suggested Citation

  • Pekka Korhonen & Seppo Salo & Ralph E. Steuer, 1997. "A Heuristic for Estimating Nadir Criterion Values in Multiple Objective Linear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 751-757, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:45:y:1997:i:5:p:751-757
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.45.5.751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.45.5.751
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.45.5.751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Murat Köksalan & Banu Lokman, 2009. "Approximating the nondominated frontiers of multi‐objective combinatorial optimization problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 191-198, March.
    2. Steuer, Ralph E. & Piercy, Craig A., 2005. "A regression study of the number of efficient extreme points in multiple objective linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 484-496, April.
    3. Serpil Sayin, 2000. "Optimizing Over the Efficient Set Using a Top-Down Search of Faces," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 65-72, February.
    4. Shukla, Pradyumn Kumar & Deb, Kalyanmoy, 2007. "On finding multiple Pareto-optimal solutions using classical and evolutionary generating methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1630-1652, September.
    5. Ehrgott, Matthias & Tenfelde-Podehl, Dagmar, 2003. "Computation of ideal and Nadir values and implications for their use in MCDM methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 119-139, November.
    6. A.P. Wierzbicki, 1998. "Reference Point Methods in Vector Optimization and Decision Support," Working Papers ir98017, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    7. Luque, M. & Marcenaro-Gutiérrez, O.D. & López-Agudo, L.A., 2015. "On the potential balance among compulsory education outcomes through econometric and multiobjective programming analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 527-540.
    8. Jeffrey Schavland & Yupo Chan & Richard A. Raines, 2009. "Information security: Designing a stochastic‐network for throughput and reliability," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(7), pages 625-641, October.
    9. Özgür Özpeynirci, 2017. "On nadir points of multiobjective integer programming problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 699-712, November.
    10. Sun, Minghe, 2005. "Some issues in measuring and reporting solution quality of interactive multiple objective programming procedures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 468-483, April.
    11. Jian Hu & Sanjay Mehrotra, 2012. "Robust and Stochastically Weighted Multiobjective Optimization Models and Reformulations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 936-953, August.
    12. Murat Köksalan & Banu Lokman, 2015. "Finding nadir points in multi-objective integer programs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 55-77, May.
    13. Metev, Boyan & Gueorguieva, Dessislava, 2000. "A simple method for obtaining weakly efficient points in multiobjective linear fractional programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 386-390, October.
    14. Ricardo Landa & Giomara Lárraga & Gregorio Toscano, 2019. "Use of a goal-constraint-based approach for finding the region of interest in multi-objective problems," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 107-139, February.
    15. Kaliszewski, Ignacy, 2003. "Dynamic parametric bounds on efficient outcomes in interactive multiple criteria decision making problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 94-107, May.
    16. Granat, Janusz & Guerriero, Francesca, 2003. "The interactive analysis of the multicriteria shortest path problem by the reference point method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 103-118, November.
    17. Alves, Maria João & Costa, João Paulo, 2009. "An exact method for computing the nadir values in multiple objective linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 637-646, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:45:y:1997:i:5:p:751-757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.